Communism

Only maximum 1.5 million communism in Sweden. Many medium Svenssons(Swedes) and Christians + racism and nazism and gay smaller arts in Sweden or racism are biggest of this third ?? Communism is boring I know and blacks are hated by Nazis. Nothing fights happens when I am musician and racist.

One gang in my house will fight when he know I'm Nazi but that will never happens.

Accept Sweden now and third biggest arts.

Christians are best of biggest arts in Sweden.

USA, Great Britain, Denmark Norway and Canada is better Swede and Finns.


Um.......huh?

 
Communism, as diluted as the meaning has become, has good aspects to it.
elimination of money. Face it, money runs our lives.
no products of pleasure. As inconvenient as that sounds, I think it would eliminate ALOT of problems a society of our advancement have manufactured. Such as laziness.


BTW people Stalin, NK and Cuba are/were NOT communist. There hasn't been a communist group since the American Indians. I guess there might be some in the jungle or something lol.
Please refrain from typical ignorance when discussing this subject :)

while the utopian idea of communism might be appealing, it isn't realistic. no one willingly gives up either money or power so the idea that the state would simply fall away is a fallacy as we saw in the USSR.
 
Only maximum 1.5 million communism in Sweden. Many medium Svenssons(Swedes) and Christians + racism and nazism and gay smaller arts in Sweden or racism are biggest of this third ?? Communism is boring I know and blacks are hated by Nazis. Nothing fights happens when I am musician and racist.

One gang in my house will fight when he know I'm Nazi but that will never happens.

Accept Sweden now and third biggest arts.

Christians are best of biggest arts in Sweden.

USA, Great Britain, Denmark Norway and Canada is better Swede and Finns.


Um.......huh?


Be nice, unk. English is obviously not his first language.
 
Communism, as diluted as the meaning has become, has good aspects to it.
elimination of money. Face it, money runs our lives.
no products of pleasure. As inconvenient as that sounds, I think it would eliminate ALOT of problems a society of our advancement have manufactured. Such as laziness.


BTW people Stalin, NK and Cuba are/were NOT communist. There hasn't been a communist group since the American Indians. I guess there might be some in the jungle or something lol.
Please refrain from typical ignorance when discussing this subject :)

while the utopian idea of communism might be appealing, it isn't realistic. no one willingly gives up either money or power so the idea that the state would simply fall away is a fallacy as we saw in the USSR.
I wont necessarily disagree with that. However, socialism will fail. Even Marx knew that. But yes, in our history, they were all dictators. Corruption was rampant.
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist

true.

because a true communist state in an industrial society is pretty much an impossibility.
what do you mean by industrial state?

fair question. native americans were able to share the way they did because they were small societies. small groups of people who were able to pool resources and share risks.

our industrial societies are massive. there aren't the same societal controls on behavior which would require that everyone pitch in and be equals.

but truth, even indigenous people, which lived as close to communism as we've seen, had a tribal government and leadership to which the community deferred
 
Only maximum 1.5 million communism in Sweden. Many medium Svenssons(Swedes) and Christians + racism and nazism and gay smaller arts in Sweden or racism are biggest of this third ?? Communism is boring I know and blacks are hated by Nazis. Nothing fights happens when I am musician and racist.

One gang in my house will fight when he know I'm Nazi but that will never happens.

Accept Sweden now and third biggest arts.

Christians are best of biggest arts in Sweden.

USA, Great Britain, Denmark Norway and Canada is better Swede and Finns.


Um.......huh?


Be nice, unk. English is obviously not his first language.



I'm wondering if he is of this planet.
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist


Your paltry pursuit of pedantry is pretentious and pathetic, pal.
That isnt pedantry at all. Socialism and communism are two sides of different coins.
Are you going to explain why communists would go to war?

The same reason Socialism always fails and Communism will never really ('really,' happy now?) happen.
 
Communism, as diluted as the meaning has become, has good aspects to it.
elimination of money. Face it, money runs our lives.
no products of pleasure. As inconvenient as that sounds, I think it would eliminate ALOT of problems a society of our advancement have manufactured. Such as laziness.


BTW people Stalin, NK and Cuba are/were NOT communist. There hasn't been a communist group since the American Indians. I guess there might be some in the jungle or something lol.
Please refrain from typical ignorance when discussing this subject :)

while the utopian idea of communism might be appealing, it isn't realistic. no one willingly gives up either money or power so the idea that the state would simply fall away is a fallacy as we saw in the USSR.
I wont necessarily disagree with that. However, socialism will fail. Even Marx knew that. But yes, in our history, they were all dictators. Corruption was rampant.

i think we need to separate the governmental system from the economic system when looking at the issue of dictatorial governments. the truth is that pure capitalism is abusive because of the oppression of the working classes as we saw in Dickensian England and in this country at the start of the industrial revolution.

but realistically, a system that is purely either socialist or capitalist is doomed to failure. the perfect system, IMO is one that mixes capitalism and socialism and prohibits the wealthiest from abusing the citizens and yet incentivizes achievement while also doing what great societies do... which is take care of the weakest, poorest, sickest and youngest among us.
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist

true.

because a true communist state in an industrial society is pretty much an impossibility.
what do you mean by industrial state?

fair question. native americans were able to share the way they did because they were small societies. small groups of people who were able to pool resources and share risks.

our industrial societies are massive. there aren't the same societal controls on behavior which would require that everyone pitch in and be equals.

but truth, even indigenous people, which lived as close to communism as we've seen, had a tribal government and leadership to which the community deferred
Yes!
However, one of the basic principles of communism is to delete wasteful production. Our industry would shrink massively.
That's a very good point about population. In fact, it is an argument I use lol
Large scale communism wouldnt work, probably. HOWEVER, would any "full scale" economic theory work?
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist


Your paltry pursuit of pedantry is pretentious and pathetic, pal.
That isnt [sic] pedantry at all. ....


Of course it is. That is the motivation behind your harping on this endlessly over several threads.
So I guess it is pedantry to establish the differences between cars and trucks?
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist

true.

because a true communist state in an industrial society is pretty much an impossibility.
what do you mean by industrial state?

fair question. native americans were able to share the way they did because they were small societies. small groups of people who were able to pool resources and share risks.

our industrial societies are massive. there aren't the same societal controls on behavior which would require that everyone pitch in and be equals.

but truth, even indigenous people, which lived as close to communism as we've seen, had a tribal government and leadership to which the community deferred
Yes!
However, one of the basic principles of communism is to delete wasteful production. Our industry would shrink massively.
That's a very good point about population. In fact, it is an argument I use lol
Large scale communism wouldnt work, probably. HOWEVER, would any "full scale" economic theory work?

probably not.... which is why I think the combination of capitalism and socialism, fine-tuned to serve our modern world, are probably the best way to manage a country....and seems to be successful elsewhere.
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist


Your paltry pursuit of pedantry is pretentious and pathetic, pal.
That isnt pedantry at all. Socialism and communism are two sides of different coins.
Are you going to explain why communists would go to war?

The same reason Socialism always fails and Communism will never really ('really,' happy now?) happen.
So you cant explain why communists would go to war? Because, technically, in order for them to be communists, the hard road through socialism would have already been complete.
 
Russia is better outside communism.
Russia has never been communist


Your paltry pursuit of pedantry is pretentious and pathetic, pal.
That isnt [sic] pedantry at all. ....


Of course it is. That is the motivation behind your harping on this endlessly over several threads.
So I guess it is pedantry to establish the differences between cars and trucks?



It's dangerous to love yourself so much without wearing a condom.
 
Russia has never been communist

true.

because a true communist state in an industrial society is pretty much an impossibility.
what do you mean by industrial state?

fair question. native americans were able to share the way they did because they were small societies. small groups of people who were able to pool resources and share risks.

our industrial societies are massive. there aren't the same societal controls on behavior which would require that everyone pitch in and be equals.

but truth, even indigenous people, which lived as close to communism as we've seen, had a tribal government and leadership to which the community deferred
Yes!
However, one of the basic principles of communism is to delete wasteful production. Our industry would shrink massively.
That's a very good point about population. In fact, it is an argument I use lol
Large scale communism wouldnt work, probably. HOWEVER, would any "full scale" economic theory work?

probably not.... which is why I think the combination of capitalism and socialism, fine-tuned to serve our modern world, are probably the best way to manage a country....and seems to be successful elsewhere.
I agree. Full fledged capitalism is how we got too big to fail lol.
 
Russia has never been communist


Your paltry pursuit of pedantry is pretentious and pathetic, pal.
That isnt [sic] pedantry at all. ....


Of course it is. That is the motivation behind your harping on this endlessly over several threads.
So I guess it is pedantry to establish the differences between cars and trucks?



It's dangerous to love yourself so much without wearing a condom.
I find it weird that a philosopher has no respect for meanings of words. To think its "pedantic" to establish differences is ignorance through and through.
 

Forum List

Back
Top