After massacring Japanese using nukes, this is what many american are proud to become of this days

How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides

In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.

What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

War is hell. Innocent people die in wars all the time. The only to way ensure that innocent lives are not lost in war is to not be involved one.
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides

In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.

What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.

It's called collateral damage, in every war that has ever happened it has taken place. It's part of war
 
Let giants sleep.

"I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve."
-- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto

220px-Admiral_Isoroku_Yamamoto.jpg

Isoroku Yamamoto Quotes at BrainyQuote.com





-----------------------------------------------
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides

In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.

What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

War is hell. Innocent people die in wars all the time. The only to way ensure that innocent lives are not lost in war is to not be involved one.

Then you support the terrorist, for many terrorist they believe that they are currently at war with those they attacked.
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides

In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.

What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

War is hell. Innocent people die in wars all the time. The only to way ensure that innocent lives are not lost in war is to not be involved one.

Then you support the terrorist, for many terrorist they believe that they are currently at war with those they attacked.

You're sort of missing the fact Japan attacked us first, don't you think civilians died at Pearl Harbor?
 
How many American and Japanese lives would have been lost with a full-scale invasion of Honshu?

Presently, America has no better allies in the Far East than Japan.

That is exactly how terrorist think where they believe killing innocent peoples are ok.

There is no justification to kill innocent peoples or even harm them.

It was WWII, Japan attacked us, if we had invaded mainland Japan the casualties would have been much much higher, on both sides

In war or not, there is no justification to kill innocent peoples, only terrorist kill them.

What Japanese did to pearl harbour is correct because it is a military base while what american did is very wrong because Hiroshima and Anagasaki is civilians cities.

It's called collateral damage, in every war that has ever happened it has taken place. It's part of war[/QUOTE

The civilians died in pearl harbour are unintentional, the point is Japan is attacking a military base, there are civilians died there or not is their own fault for being there during the attack. But in Horishima and Nagasaki are civilians cities and not military base so of course those who will died when those 2 cities got attacked will be civilians. It is like that colletoral damage stuff you mentioned for pearl harbour and not for Horishima and Nagasaki.

As for what happen in Nanking, know that Chinese are not american while Chinese never ask american to nuke and rape Japanese, also not many Japanese this days who become as wannabe Chinese so you miss the point of this topic.

It seems you care so much about what Japanese think about american, are you a weeb too? If not then you probably support weebs or maybe another american who can't live without Japanese.
 

Forum List

Back
Top