CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Ambivalent1

Gold Member
Dec 8, 2018
3,716
372
150
West
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and
axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)
 
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)





Luck has nothing to do with it. People are tired of their biased "reporting".
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)





Luck has nothing to do with it. People are tired of their biased "reporting".

Take it up with the writer.
 
They don't care. It is all about the Leftist Agenda and message. Their ownership doesn't need the money. Just like, NBC, and MSNBC. Comcast doesn't need them to be profitable. Comcast, and CEO (Democrat financier) Brian Roberts just hosted a Joe Biden fund raiser.
 
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)
This fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy.

Television ratings have become meaningless and irrelevant in the age of streaming, the internet, and smartphones – no longer an indication of how popular a program or network may or may not be.

People get their news from CNN.com and watch CNN on its mobile app – cable news is old technology; except for Fox fossils, few sit at home watching news on TV anymore.
 
Have they considered evolving to actual news channel yet?

Nah, Clown News Network as usual. Anti-American opinion pieces in America and they wonder why it doesn't sell.
 
You have to be a real mushroom head to still be watching CNN.
What kind of robot can sit there and literally listen to Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! - 24 hours a day.
It is all they do now.
 
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)
This fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy.

Television ratings have become meaningless and irrelevant in the age of streaming, the internet, and smartphones – no longer an indication of how popular a program or network may or may not be.

People get their news from CNN.com and watch CNN on its mobile app – cable news is old technology; except for Fox fossils, few sit at home watching news on TV anymore.

The only failure here is your knee jerk need to defend everything and denigrate any truth that you don't approve of.
 
"
If it weren’t for bad luck, CNN would have no luck at all -- especially when it comes to ratings during the network’s vitally important primetime schedule.

In May, the channel lost 16 percent of its weekday evening audience from the previous month, falling to just 761,000 viewers and winding up dead last among such cable networks as liberal rival MSNBC and the dominant Fox News Channel."

snip....

"
The embattled CNN, which always lands in far-last place and axed more than 100 jobs already this year, had about as bad of a ratings month as is possible in May.

Its primetime hours were only able to average a measly 761,000 viewers, while the fake news outlet’s total day viewers dove nine percent (compared to this same month last year) to just 559,000 viewers."


CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again

Clearly your Rump shit is working ;)
This fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy.

Television ratings have become meaningless and irrelevant in the age of streaming, the internet, and smartphones – no longer an indication of how popular a program or network may or may not be.

People get their news from CNN.com and watch CNN on its mobile app – cable news is old technology; except for Fox fossils, few sit at home watching news on TV anymore.





Wrong, it is you who are failing at critical thinking. If your contention were indeed factual, which it is clearly not, then FOX news would likewise be laying off people. They aren't. Thus, your assertion is proven false from the beginning.
 
CNN Has Double-Digit Monthly Ratings Loss in Primetime … Again




not after yesterday -

:auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top