Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
I thought so.
Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.
Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.
Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...
Get real....
Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.
I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?
Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.
Klien gave us the sea rise crap..
Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.
The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth
Well, sources are quite revealing.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
I thought so.
Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.
All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.
Ah, yes. I must be part of the conspiracy, right?Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.
Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...
Get real....
Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.
I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?
Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.
Klien gave us the sea rise crap..
Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.
The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Do you really want to fuck with us paid noob?
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
Damn, Bear, fucking with a willfully ignorant ass is all too easy. Perhaps you are a paid poster, doesn't mean everyone else is. I certainly am not. I make a very adaquaete salary where I work.Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.
Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...
Get real....
Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.
I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?
Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.
Klien gave us the sea rise crap..
Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.
The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Do you really want to fuck with us paid noob?
Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
I thought so.
Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.
All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.
Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.
Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
I thought so.
Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.
All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.
Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.
Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.
But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...
Go away, noob
I thought so.
Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.
All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.
I'm starting to see the pattern here. No coherent arguments, denial of basic facts, and misinterpretation simple sources.
And then when they've not noting else, they accuse the other side of being paid to post.
Oh, well, I guess they think I seem very professional.
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
Can't find one, huh?
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth
Yup lassy we have heart, soul and real science on our side
They just have paid pretend science And propaganda on theirs..
I think you're confused.In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..
If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth
Yup lassy we have heart, soul and real science on our side
They just have paid pretend science And propaganda on theirs..
Noaa, nasa and nearly every science institution on this planet is fake? Is that what you're saying??? You're mentally challenged if you believe this. I do feel sorry for you and believe you may very well have much heart in what you believe.
In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?Obama is a serial liar.
Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.
Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?
And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.
What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?
After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?
If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?
Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus
