NASA and ESA on the cause of the heat wave

Delldude

Sheep Dipped Boy Scout
Gold Supporting Member
Dec 12, 2014
18,099
11,801
1,138
Plasticville U.S.A
Massive release of water vapor from an underwater volcano is causing these 'rivers of moisture' in the atmosphere. Something like 146 teragrams of vapor, heating the atmosphere and oceans. Not to worry, scientists say it will take several years of heat waves to dissipate back near normal.

So, why has atmospheric water vapor increased so dramatically? Because of a historic, gigantic volcanic eruption last year that I – probably along with you -- had never heard of. The mass media ignored it because it took place 490 feet underwater in the South Pacific. Don’t take it from me, take it from NASA (and please do follow the link to see time lapse satellite imagery of the underwater eruption and subsequent plume of gasses and water injected into the atmosphere):
____________________________
NASA published the above in August 2022. Half a year later, a newer study increased the estimate of the water vapor addition to the atmosphere by 30%. From the European Space Agency:

In a recent paper published in Nature, a team of scientists showed the unprecedented increase in the global stratospheric water mass by 13% (relative to climatological levels) and a five-fold increase of stratospheric aerosol load – the highest in the last three decades.
Using a combination of satellite data, including data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite, and ground-based observations, the team found that due to the extreme altitude, the volcanic plume circumnavigated the Earth in just one week and dispersed nearly pole-to-pole in three months. [emphasis added]
____________________________
Another scientific paper explains the “net warming of the climate system” on a delayed basis. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory further explains:

Volcanic eruptions rarely inject much water into the stratosphere. In the 18 years that NASA has been taking measurements, only two other eruptions – the 2008 Kasatochi event in Alaska and the 2015 Calbuco eruption in Chile – sent appreciable amounts of water vapor to such high altitudes. But those were mere blips compared to the Tonga event, and the water vapor from both previous eruptions dissipated quickly. The excess water vapor injected by the Tonga volcano, on the other hand, could remain in the stratosphere for several years.
This extra water vapor could influence atmospheric chemistry, boosting certain chemical reactions that could temporarily worsen depletion of the ozone layer. It could also influence surface temperatures. Massive volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Mount Pinatubo typically cool Earth’s surface by ejecting gases, dust, and ash that reflect sunlight back into space. In contrast, the Tonga volcano didn’t inject large amounts of aerosols into the stratosphere, and the huge amounts of water vapor from the eruption may have a small, temporary warming effect, since water vapor traps heat. The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere [Emphases added]
________________________________

Jeff Childers, who brought this scientific data to my notice, writes:

Here’s why corporate media is ignoring the most dramatic climate even[t] in modern history: because you can’t legislate underwater volcanoes. You can try, but they won’t listen. So what’s the fun in that? Corporate media only exists to further political ends. Since volcanoes aren’t subject to politics, why bother?


What NASA and the European Space Agency are admitting but the media are failing to report about our current heat wave (bumped)
 
Massive release of water vapor from an underwater volcano is causing these 'rivers of moisture' in the atmosphere. Something like 146 teragrams of vapor, heating the atmosphere and oceans. Not to worry, scientists say it will take several years of heat waves to dissipate back near normal.

So, why has atmospheric water vapor increased so dramatically? Because of a historic, gigantic volcanic eruption last year that I – probably along with you -- had never heard of. The mass media ignored it because it took place 490 feet underwater in the South Pacific. Don’t take it from me, take it from NASA (and please do follow the link to see time lapse satellite imagery of the underwater eruption and subsequent plume of gasses and water injected into the atmosphere):
____________________________
NASA published the above in August 2022. Half a year later, a newer study increased the estimate of the water vapor addition to the atmosphere by 30%. From the European Space Agency:

In a recent paper published in Nature, a team of scientists showed the unprecedented increase in the global stratospheric water mass by 13% (relative to climatological levels) and a five-fold increase of stratospheric aerosol load – the highest in the last three decades.
Using a combination of satellite data, including data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite, and ground-based observations, the team found that due to the extreme altitude, the volcanic plume circumnavigated the Earth in just one week and dispersed nearly pole-to-pole in three months. [emphasis added]
____________________________
Another scientific paper explains the “net warming of the climate system” on a delayed basis. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory further explains:

Volcanic eruptions rarely inject much water into the stratosphere. In the 18 years that NASA has been taking measurements, only two other eruptions – the 2008 Kasatochi event in Alaska and the 2015 Calbuco eruption in Chile – sent appreciable amounts of water vapor to such high altitudes. But those were mere blips compared to the Tonga event, and the water vapor from both previous eruptions dissipated quickly. The excess water vapor injected by the Tonga volcano, on the other hand, could remain in the stratosphere for several years.
This extra water vapor could influence atmospheric chemistry, boosting certain chemical reactions that could temporarily worsen depletion of the ozone layer. It could also influence surface temperatures. Massive volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Mount Pinatubo typically cool Earth’s surface by ejecting gases, dust, and ash that reflect sunlight back into space. In contrast, the Tonga volcano didn’t inject large amounts of aerosols into the stratosphere, and the huge amounts of water vapor from the eruption may have a small, temporary warming effect, since water vapor traps heat. The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere [Emphases added]
________________________________

Jeff Childers, who brought this scientific data to my notice, writes:

Here’s why corporate media is ignoring the most dramatic climate even[t] in modern history: because you can’t legislate underwater volcanoes. You can try, but they won’t listen. So what’s the fun in that? Corporate media only exists to further political ends. Since volcanoes aren’t subject to politics, why bother?

What NASA and the European Space Agency are admitting but the media are failing to report about our current heat wave (bumped)


Saw this yesterday.
Funny how the MSM ignored this story.
You know for a fact that the glowbull warming BS is fake when they dont point out a very important event that could likely be the reason for the recent uptick in temps.
 
Massive release of water vapor from an underwater volcano is causing these 'rivers of moisture' in the atmosphere. Something like 146 teragrams of vapor, heating the atmosphere and oceans. Not to worry, scientists say it will take several years of heat waves to dissipate back near normal.

So, why has atmospheric water vapor increased so dramatically? Because of a historic, gigantic volcanic eruption last year that I – probably along with you -- had never heard of. The mass media ignored it because it took place 490 feet underwater in the South Pacific. Don’t take it from me, take it from NASA (and please do follow the link to see time lapse satellite imagery of the underwater eruption and subsequent plume of gasses and water injected into the atmosphere):
____________________________
NASA published the above in August 2022. Half a year later, a newer study increased the estimate of the water vapor addition to the atmosphere by 30%. From the European Space Agency:

In a recent paper published in Nature, a team of scientists showed the unprecedented increase in the global stratospheric water mass by 13% (relative to climatological levels) and a five-fold increase of stratospheric aerosol load – the highest in the last three decades.
Using a combination of satellite data, including data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite, and ground-based observations, the team found that due to the extreme altitude, the volcanic plume circumnavigated the Earth in just one week and dispersed nearly pole-to-pole in three months. [emphasis added]
____________________________
Another scientific paper explains the “net warming of the climate system” on a delayed basis. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory further explains:

Volcanic eruptions rarely inject much water into the stratosphere. In the 18 years that NASA has been taking measurements, only two other eruptions – the 2008 Kasatochi event in Alaska and the 2015 Calbuco eruption in Chile – sent appreciable amounts of water vapor to such high altitudes. But those were mere blips compared to the Tonga event, and the water vapor from both previous eruptions dissipated quickly. The excess water vapor injected by the Tonga volcano, on the other hand, could remain in the stratosphere for several years.
This extra water vapor could influence atmospheric chemistry, boosting certain chemical reactions that could temporarily worsen depletion of the ozone layer. It could also influence surface temperatures. Massive volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Mount Pinatubo typically cool Earth’s surface by ejecting gases, dust, and ash that reflect sunlight back into space. In contrast, the Tonga volcano didn’t inject large amounts of aerosols into the stratosphere, and the huge amounts of water vapor from the eruption may have a small, temporary warming effect, since water vapor traps heat. The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere [Emphases added]
________________________________

Jeff Childers, who brought this scientific data to my notice, writes:

Here’s why corporate media is ignoring the most dramatic climate even[t] in modern history: because you can’t legislate underwater volcanoes. You can try, but they won’t listen. So what’s the fun in that? Corporate media only exists to further political ends. Since volcanoes aren’t subject to politics, why bother?

What NASA and the European Space Agency are admitting but the media are failing to report about our current heat wave (bumped)
And here I thought it was because of the gas powered car I've been driving. Whew, what a relief!
 
Massive release of water vapor from an underwater volcano is causing these 'rivers of moisture' in the atmosphere. Something like 146 teragrams of vapor, heating the atmosphere and oceans. Not to worry, scientists say it will take several years of heat waves to dissipate back near normal.

So, why has atmospheric water vapor increased so dramatically? Because of a historic, gigantic volcanic eruption last year that I – probably along with you -- had never heard of. The mass media ignored it because it took place 490 feet underwater in the South Pacific. Don’t take it from me, take it from NASA

Ok, I will. From your article.

"The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere and would not be enough to noticeably exacerbate climate change effects."

(and please do follow the link to see time lapse satellite imagery of the underwater eruption and subsequent plume of gasses and water injected into the atmosphere):
____________________________
NASA published the above in August 2022. Half a year later, a newer study increased the estimate of the water vapor addition to the atmosphere by 30%. From the European Space Agency:

In a recent paper published in Nature, a team of scientists showed the unprecedented increase in the global stratospheric water mass by 13% (relative to climatological levels) and a five-fold increase of stratospheric aerosol load – the highest in the last three decades.
Using a combination of satellite data, including data from ESA’s Aeolus satellite, and ground-based observations, the team found that due to the extreme altitude, the volcanic plume circumnavigated the Earth in just one week and dispersed nearly pole-to-pole in three months. [emphasis added]
____________________________
Another scientific paper explains the “net warming of the climate system” on a delayed basis. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory further explains:

Volcanic eruptions rarely inject much water into the stratosphere. In the 18 years that NASA has been taking measurements, only two other eruptions – the 2008 Kasatochi event in Alaska and the 2015 Calbuco eruption in Chile – sent appreciable amounts of water vapor to such high altitudes. But those were mere blips compared to the Tonga event, and the water vapor from both previous eruptions dissipated quickly. The excess water vapor injected by the Tonga volcano, on the other hand, could remain in the stratosphere for several years.
This extra water vapor could influence atmospheric chemistry, boosting certain chemical reactions that could temporarily worsen depletion of the ozone layer. It could also influence surface temperatures. Massive volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Mount Pinatubo typically cool Earth’s surface by ejecting gases, dust, and ash that reflect sunlight back into space. In contrast, the Tonga volcano didn’t inject large amounts of aerosols into the stratosphere, and the huge amounts of water vapor from the eruption may have a small, temporary warming effect, since water vapor traps heat. The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere [Emphases added]
________________________________

Jeff Childers, who brought this scientific data to my notice, writes:

Here’s why corporate media is ignoring the most dramatic climate even[t] in modern history: because you can’t legislate underwater volcanoes. You can try, but they won’t listen. So what’s the fun in that? Corporate media only exists to further political ends. Since volcanoes aren’t subject to politics, why bother?

What NASA and the European Space Agency are admitting but the media are failing to report about our current heat wave (bumped)
 
I am baffled and amazed --- NASA reporting something true , albeit known already for many years . 75% of volcanic eruptions occur under water and within Solar cycle 25 such activity will increase hugely . Nothing to do with global warming from our activities .
 
Ok, I will. From your article.

"The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere and would not be enough to noticeably exacerbate climate change effects."
The topic was how an underwater volcano inserted huge amounts of water vapor into the upper atmosphere and is affecting our current weather patterns.

Nice try.
 
And from your own link NASA said it wouldn't have a noticable effect.
Not discussing climate change effects. Article also said this excess water vapor would take years to dissipate, and could affect our weather patterns and global temperatures worse than CO2.

Try again.
 
Not discussing climate change effects. Article also said this excess water vapor would take years to dissipate, and could affect our weather patterns and global temperatures worse than CO2.

Try again.
The NASA article said that?
 
That is strange.

When I open the NASA article and do a search for the letters CO...CO2 doesn't come up.

Are you getting your links confused?
Article also said this excess water vapor would take years to dissipate, and could affect our weather patterns and global temperatures worse than CO2.

The current heat wave is being relentlessly blamed on increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but there is a much more plausible explanation, one that is virtually endorsed by two of the world's leading scientific organizations. It turns out that levels of water vapor in the atmosphere have dramatically increased over the last year and a half, and water vapor is well recognized as a greenhouse gas, whose heightened presence leads to higher temperatures, a mechanism that dwarfs any effect CO2 may have.
 
The current heat wave is being relentlessly blamed on increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but there is a much more plausible explanation, one that is virtually endorsed by two of the world's leading scientific organizations. It turns out that levels of water vapor in the atmosphere have dramatically increased over the last year and a half, and water vapor is well recognized as a greenhouse gas, whose heightened presence leads to higher temperatures, a mechanism that dwarfs any effect CO2 may have.
That isn't the NASA article.

I see what your angle is.

You are using Gish Gallup to include multiple articles representing overwhelming amounts of info to distract the reader and push your false narrative.

You lead with a NASA article that describes the phenomenon and hope people don't note that the NASA article itself concludes the opposite of your claim and won't have a noticable effect.

Then you say it is way worse then CO2 how effects climate and try to pass it off as a NASA conclusion but actually are using an opinion piece from an editor for the American Thinker which is a far right conspiracy site.

Transparent tactic. The only question that remains is, are you a Russian troll or the duped?

Either way, it looks The Duke bought your nonsense hook, line, and sinker.

 
Ok, I will. From your article.

"The effect would dissipate when the extra water vapor cycles out of the stratosphere and would not be enough to noticeably exacerbate climate change effects."
But it would affect weather in the short term until it did. Weather isn’t climate change. I e hear they every time it’s colder than normal or it snows early or late.
 
That isn't the NASA article.

I see what your angle is.

You are using Gish Gallup to include multiple articles representing overwhelming amounts of info to distract the reader and push your false narrative.

You lead with a NASA article that describes the phenomenon and hope people don't note that the NASA article itself concludes the opposite of your claim and won't have a noticable effect.

Then you say it is way worse then CO2 how effects climate and try to pass it off as a NASA conclusion but actually are using an opinion piece from an editor for the American Thinker which is a far right conspiracy site.

Transparent tactic. The only question that remains is, are you a Russian troll or the duped?

Either way, it looks The Duke bought your nonsense hook, line, and sinker.

The article shows, from two separate scientific organizations, sourced BTW, how, globally, there are excess amounts, suddenly, of precipitation in record amounts, all over the globe......and not attributed to GW or CC, however the climate cons are attempting to push that narrative.....looks like you bought into it, hook, line and sinker.

Losing the argument, you have to resort to ad hominem attacks.......LOL.
 
The article shows, from two separate scientific organizations, sourced BTW, how, globally, there are excess amounts, suddenly, of precipitation in record amounts, all over the globe......and not attributed to GW or CC, however the climate cons are attempting to push that narrative.....looks like you bought into it, hook, line and sinker.

Losing the argument, you have to resort to ad hominem attacks.......LOL.
The NASA article directly refutes your American Thinker editor opinion and you tried to pass off the claim that it is way more influencing then CO2.

Which of your articles makes that claim, other then American Thinker?
 

Forum List

Back
Top