Claims of Trump's Willful Blindness Not a Good Defense. Because in America, the rule of law still matters.

[Dante Reawakened]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Dante Reawakened]

One:

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Two:

 

[TNHarley]

Because in America, the rule of law still matters​

 

[Lastamender]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

Are you fucking serious? The rule of law is gone. A laughable post from a moron hack.

 

[White 6]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

Good Article. Here is the article, not behind the New York Times paywall.

How Free Speech and Willful Blindness Will Play Out in the Trump Prosecution

More than a decade ago, a divided Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Alvarez that an elected member of

dnyuz.com

This is not the first time Trump's willful blindness has come up. The Washington post wrote of Trump and the concept of willful blindness, back in June. Here is a link, but for many, it too will be behind a pay wall.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/21/trump-willful-blindness-january-6/

 

[Donald H]

While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

There's a more excellent chance that Trump will be found not guilty of any crime!

And fwiw, guilt being established, the American system allows the appeals to be drawn out for years, and at least as long as is necessary to make it not matter.

To put it bluntly, you're fkd.

Guilt or innocence needed to be established with finality on Jan. 6th.

 

[Frankenstein]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

Pinko commie jurists

 

[Blaster]

I lost faith in the jury system when OJ Simpson was found not guilty. It is very difficult to find an impartial jury.

 

[Frankenstein]

I lost faith in the jury system when OJ Simpson was found not guilty. It is very difficult to find an impartial jury.

No chance in DC

 

[Blaster]

I served as jury foreman two years ago and some of the jurors ignored the evidence which exonerated the person charged with the crime.

 

[MarathonMike]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

You are a member of the groupthink collective. You are told what to think and what to believe by The Regime.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

.




Cool post.

Here ya go:

 

[MarathonMike]

Two:

If you had a functioning brain, you would question how the F--- is Donald Trump guilty of more felonies than anyone in US history. Our DOJ is a joke. Repeat that 10 times every night before you go to bed.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

If you had a functioning brain, you would question how the F--- is Donald Trump guilty of more felonies than anyone in US history. Our DOJ is a joke. Repeat that 10 times every night before you go to bed.

Because he is Donald Trump. "The Don" A life of crime has caught up to him

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump can be remanded to prison will the appeal plays out.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Trump can be remanded to prison will the appeal plays out.

.




WTF?

English, please?




.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

.




Cool post.

Here ya go:

View attachment 822072

Nah, I heard you'll take it all without the lube

 

[Dante Reawakened]

I'm a 'Yuge' defender of the Judicial Branch of our government. I remember Justice Scalia's opinion on flag burning and speech. It was a very principled argument.

Now we have Scalia. Probably one of the least lovable Justices from a moderate/liberal standpoint, but like Scalia he handed us down a principled decision. A principled decision on criminal defendants like Mr. Trump, trying to escape the reach of of the law by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.

Trump willfully blind truthful hyperbole Alito -- 91 criminal indictments This is America the rule of law still matters

TRUMP & SCOTUS Scalia/Flag Burning and now Alioto/Willful Blindness THANK YOU Because in America, the rule of law still matters

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

Opinion | There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The First Amendment and the former president’s claim that he believed he won won’t help him.

www.nytimes.com

great quote(s):

There’s a Good Chance Trump Will Be Found ‘Willfully Blind’

The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s doctrine of willful blindness. A dozen years ago, in the case of Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for all but one justice, ruled that proof of willful blindness is the legal equivalent of proving guilty knowledge.

As Justice Alito explained it, “Many criminal statutes require proof that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully, and courts applying the doctrine of willful blindness hold that defendants cannot escape the reach of these statutes by deliberately shielding themselves from clear evidence of critical facts that are strongly suggested by the circumstances.”

In other words, when a defendant, like Mr. Trump, is on notice of the potential likelihood of an inconvenient fact (Mr. Biden’s legitimate victory) and closes his eyes to overwhelming evidence of that fact, the willfully blind defendant is just as guilty as if he actually knew the fact. While this argument is not a slam dunk, there’s an excellent chance that 12 jurors will find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. Trump hid from the truth by adopting willful blindness.

 

[Zincwarrior]

.




WTF?

English, please?




.

Means his ass goes to jail.