Christians fought the first "War on Christmas"....and lost.....

Syriusly

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2014
54,850
7,154
1,840
puritan-christmas-color.jpg


But the US relationship with the Christian holiday is pretty complex.


Did you know, for example, that Christmas used to be illegal in Massachusetts and much of New England? And it remained taboo in that part of the country until at least 1870, when the Feds declared it a national holiday.

Massachusetts was founded in the 1620s by English folks seeking to practice their form of Christianity in their own way, and that definitely did not include Christmas.


They were called Puritans because they wanted to purify the church and the Christian faith of its pagan legacies: all those ancient customs rooted in Germanic and Celtic folklore. They were just anathema. Things like touching a piece of holly to a yule log for luck; or decking your halls with boughs of holly and ivy; or making fires and lighting candles; or hanging gaudy decorations; or carousing and singing to keep the sun alive; or going ‘a-wassailing’ (going house-to-house singing carols); or putting on mummers plays.


The Puritans thought these things were all extremely un-Christian, and they fought hard to stamp out this nonsense in their new "cittie upon a hill," their new godly colony, their new Jerusalem. Even feasting was not approved. Instead of yule-tide, they condemned it as fools-tide.


But they're still Christian, right, so one would assume that at least they went to church to celebrate Christ's birth? Nothing could be further from the truth. Unless it fell on the Sabbath, December 25th was treated like an entirely normal day. Everyone was expected to work, or go to school, just like any other day.


The opposition to Christmas was both theological and moral.


Their theological argument was that they saw nothing in scripture to warrant the celebration of Christ's birth. They saw Christmas as a sly trick played by the early Catholic church to graft Christianity onto the older pagan ways of Europe — the customs that had always celebrated the birth of the New Year around the time of the solstice.


Also, Christ was seen as a manifestation of God, and therefore should be revered, but not venerated like an idol.


The Twelve Days of Christmas were also denounced as the most immoral time of the year, full of rude revelry, idleness, hard drinking and promiscuity. Kissing under the mistletoe was right out.


So Christmas was seen by the Puritans as superstitious or even heretical. Ministers could be arrested for holding Christmas services. From 1659 to 1681, anyone caught celebrating Christmas in Massachusetts was subject to a fine of 5 shillings — that was about a week's wages for a laborer.


After 1681, Christmas was no longer a crime, but it remained completely taboo. Anyone caught making merry or singing carols was prosecuted for disturbing the peace, well into the 18th century.


Even gift-giving, or charitable giving, was frowned on as just another ancient mid-winter custom that the Puritans attempted to stamp out in their war on Christmas.

. But what really made the difference in the end was the transformation of the population in this part of the country in the mid-19th century from mass immigration, especially from Ireland.



America’s first War on Christmas eased slowly over the centuries. Prosecutions faded, but it remained culturally taboo. It remained a regular working day, and school day, in Massachusetts until 1870, when the federal government proclaimed it a national holiday. President Ulysses S. Grant thought having a national holiday on Christmas was a way to unify the country after the civil war.


That was 250 years after the first Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock.
 
Hard to believe how little the conservatives understand of their nations history,. Really sad.
Unfortunately, knowing history is something American's generally lack. It is not a partisan affair. A leftist state run school system holds much responsibility for this failure.

That said, no group of Americans is more lacking in historical knowledge, than leftists. Leftism has caused more death, destruction, and human suffering than all other things combined. Yet, leftists want more of it...CRAZY!!!

BTW Mattieboy, your signature exposes your ignorance. There is no such thing as accountable government...at least not as government is practiced in America today. So you can stop dreaming.
 
Come on lefties, "St. Nicholas day" was practiced by early Dutch settlers in New York and Christmas was a well established tradition by the late 1700's and the turn of the 19th century. Liberals still can't seem to get it through their small minds that the Bill of Rights including the 1st Amendment was intended to be a limitation of the power of the federal government.
 
Last edited:
Come on lefties, "St. Nicholas day" was practiced by early Dutch settlers in New York and Christmas was a well established tradition by the late 1700's and the turn of the 19th century. Liberals still can't seem to get it through their small minds that the Bill of Rights including the 1st Amendment was intended to be a limitation of the power of the federal government.

whitehall- once again denying history. Now whitehall is saying that the Dutch were more important to American history than the Puritans.

Did you know, for example, that Christmas used to be illegal in Massachusetts and much of New England? And it remained taboo in that part of the country until at least 1870, when the Feds declared it a national holiday.

Massachusetts was founded in the 1620s by English folks seeking to practice their form of Christianity in their own way, and that definitely did not include Christmas.


They were called Puritans because they wanted to purify the church and the Christian faith of its pagan legacies: all those ancient customs rooted in Germanic and Celtic folklore. They were just anathema. Things like touching a piece of holly to a yule log for luck; or decking your halls with boughs of holly and ivy; or making fires and lighting candles; or hanging gaudy decorations; or carousing and singing to keep the sun alive; or going ‘a-wassailing’ (going house-to-house singing carols); or putting on mummers plays.


The Puritans thought these things were all extremely un-Christian, and they fought hard to stamp out this nonsense in their new "cittie upon a hill," their new godly colony, their new Jerusalem. Even feasting was not approved. Instead of yule-tide, they condemned it as fools-tide.


But they're still Christian, right, so one would assume that at least they went to church to celebrate Christ's birth? Nothing could be further from the truth. Unless it fell on the Sabbath, December 25th was treated like an entirely normal day. Everyone was expected to work, or go to school, just like any other day.


The opposition to Christmas was both theological and moral.


Their theological argument was that they saw nothing in scripture to warrant the celebration of Christ's birth. They saw Christmas as a sly trick played by the early Catholic church to graft Christianity onto the older pagan ways of Europe — the customs that had always celebrated the birth of the New Year around the time of the solstice.


Also, Christ was seen as a manifestation of God, and therefore should be revered, but not venerated like an idol.
 
Hard to believe how little the conservatives understand of their nations history,. Really sad.
Sort of like Democrats and their history of slavery, Jim Crow, and segregation. At one time the DNC website had the line "The Democratic Party fighting for civil rights for over 200 years."
 

Forum List

Back
Top