Can't You Just Hear Poootin' And His Other Bosses

[Campbell]

Playing ol' Trump like a cheap harmonica!

 

[pismoe]

maybe , might be , thats why its best for the TRUMP to rebuild the USA military and get some [more] overwhelming nuke weapon and other weapons capability Campbell .

 

[Stratford57]

Playing ol' Trump like a cheap harmonica!

I wonder who puts those stupid words in all you liberals' useless mouths and makes you repeat same foolish things over and over again...

Aren't you liberals tired of yourselves yet? I wish you paid closer attention to your "leaders" who don't mind to cheat you, guys, or at least demand some evidence of what they make you repeat like parrots...

 

[BULLDOG]

maybe , might be , thats why its best for the TRUMP to rebuild the USA military and get some [more] overwhelming nuke weapon and other weapons capability Campbell .

Yep, We've been needing a new nuclear race for a while now. I wonder what they were waiting on.

 

[pismoe]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

 

[BULLDOG]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

If you don't already know, there is nothing I can say to get through to you.

 

[Lastamender]

Playing ol' Trump like a cheap harmonica!

Playing with yourself?

 

[pismoe]

i mean , a nuke arms race means competition between the racers and pressure on them makes them build 'mo' better and more destructive nukes and weapons as they try to outdo one another . A nuke arms race means better nukes because of weapons science breakthroughs Bulldog .

 

[pismoe]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

If you don't already know, there is nothing I can say to get through to you.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in other words you are just a scaredy cat eh Bulldog !!

 

[BULLDOG]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

If you don't already know, there is nothing I can say to get through to you.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in other words you are just a scaredy cat eh Bulldog !!

YUP.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

If you don't already know, there is nothing I can say to get through to you.

That is liberalese for - they didn't tell me a response to that argument.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The funny thing is putin.and.eveey world.leader played Obama, there wasn't one country that didn't bend him over and fuck the shit out of us

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The funny thing is putin.and.eveey world.leader played Obama, there wasn't one country that didn't bend him over and fuck the shit out of us

And BO enjoyed taking it in the poop shoot.....not that there is anything wrong with that.

 

[BULLDOG]

like i already said in previous posts , i have lived through the cubano missle crisis , vietnam , the cold war , kruschev beating his shoe on the podium , nuke proliferation , jfk getting plugged , mutualy assured destruction , global cooling , yada and yada . Whats the big deal with a new nuclear arms race Bulldog ?? ------------------ [tell me please , i want to know why you guys are scared of another nuke race Bulldog]

If you don't already know, there is nothing I can say to get through to you.

That is liberalese for - they didn't tell me a response to that argument.

True. I'm not sure anybody could convince someone that a nuclear race is a bad thing if they don't already know it. Some crazy beliefs just have no response.

 

[pismoe]

like I said , you sound like a scaredy cat Bulldog !!

 

[Campbell]

Playing ol' Trump like a cheap harmonica!

I wonder who puts those stupid words in all you liberals' useless mouths and makes you repeat same foolish things over and over again...

Aren't you liberals tired of yourselves yet? I wish you paid closer attention to your "leaders" who don't mind to cheat you, guys, or at least demand some evidence of what they make you repeat like parrots...

Go screw yourself! I've told this a few times here. The first thing Obama did was end two goddam Republican wars. The one in Iraq was totally unnecessary. The Republicans had been looking for an excuse to invade Iraq since 1993 when Saddam Hussein tried to assassinate old man Bush. This letter from 1998 proves it:

December 18, 1998

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding,
and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end
of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear
and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a
new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world.
That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power. We stand ready
to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor. The policy of containment of Saddam
Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we
can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to
punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not
producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections
were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if
not impossible to monitor Iraq's chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during
which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely
that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam's secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we
will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess
such weapons. Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle
East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass
destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American
troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant
portion of the world's supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President,
the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle
this threat. Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the
steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate.
The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten
to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action
as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power.
That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.
We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy
for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and
military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy,
we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under
existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests
in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity
in the UN Security Council. We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass
destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security
interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at
risk.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitag William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky
Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W.Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick

 

[Campbell]

The funny thing is putin.and.eveey world.leader played Obama, there wasn't one country that didn't bend him over and fuck the shit out of us

For me and my wife it's been the best eight years of our lives. We've raked a cool $100,000 right off the top of our two IRA's and still haven't touched the principal.

Or didn't you notice that George W. Bush left the stock market at about 9000?

 

[Lastamender]

The funny thing is putin.and.eveey world.leader played Obama, there wasn't one country that didn't bend him over and fuck the shit out of us

For me and my wife it's been the best eight years of our lives. We've raked a cool $100,000 right off the top of our two IRA's and still haven't touched the principal.

Or didn't you notice that George W. Bush left the stock market at about 9000?

How much money did the other Presidents from quantitative easing and the appearance of wealth that isn't really there? Obama got that. And Clinton had the dot.com boom.

 

[BluesLegend]

When Obama and Hillary were kissing Putin's ass you libs cheered. Until you answer for that you have zero credibility.

 

[Campbell]

maybe , might be , thats why its best for the TRUMP to rebuild the USA military and get some [more] overwhelming nuke weapon and other weapons capability Campbell .

I suppose you've forgotten how long it took to reduce the stockpile of each nation. This country had over 22,000 nukes and before the thing began to shrink some didn't even know how many the others had. Ignorant assed Trump wants to warm up a new race.