can you tell what this is in the photo

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by DiveCon, Sep 29, 2009.

?

what do you see in the photo

Poll closed Oct 19, 2009.
  1. concrete

    28.6%
  2. gypsum wallboard

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. steel columns

    14.3%
  4. no way to clearly tell

    71.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    just a basic question, is there anything you can definitively claim the construction of what ever thing is still standing for this time the photo was taken


    [​IMG]
     
  2. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Nope.
     
  3. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    no one else has an opinion on this?
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,571
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    Get to the point. Obviously after a building collapses into a bunch of city blocks with other buildings and smoke obscuring the collapse you can not tell much of anything.
     
  5. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    that IS the point
    i'm looking to see if others can tell anything more than i can
     
  6. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    All of the above. It's common knowledge.
     
  7. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    47,661
    Thanks Received:
    11,827
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +24,003
    I don't think it is any part of the WTC, that building collapsed floor by floor. It seems to be a building across the street but obstructed by smoke.
     
  8. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    its the inner core..your post is a perfect example of how people don't even know the official story..still stuck back on things like the NOVA simulation of the collapse that just left out the core or the popular mechanics pancake theory it was debunked by truthers so then they invented this one

    NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.

    NIST's Investigation of the Sept. 11 World Trade Center Disaster - Frequently Asked Questions
     
  9. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    47,661
    Thanks Received:
    11,827
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +24,003

    It's too far away from the standing WTC building to be an inner core of it's twin tower.
     
  10. Shorebreak
    Offline

    Shorebreak Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    395
    Thanks Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +102
    Low resolution pictures or frames from a video can sometimes be very difficult or impossible to use as a reference for solid opinion. Do you have a video clip that shows the collapse from this angle?

    To me, it looks like a building in the distance, but the resolution is bad, the perspective is too distorted by dust in the top half of the image, and the pyroclastic cloud rolling out at the bottom (this is what overturned vehicles and sent firemen sailing up stairwells in nearby buildings) hides virtually everything else.
     

Share This Page