can we use science and technology to fight election cheating?

[Truthmatters]

Lying about what the cases obviously say is insane


you fool no one

 

[flacaltenn]

Moderation Message:

Instead of personal attacks, we should stick to this OP and respect the OP choice of forum which is the correct Forum for this question. Less flaming, more ideas and content -- Please..

flacaltenn

 

[flacaltenn]

or is there none in this country?

Of course there's technology that would assure more reliable voting.. The problem is -- the govt cant seem to create a website for less than $300Mill that works.

It obvious that you can show up at the polls in a bathing suit and NO ID ---- IF -----
The registrar has already checked your voter eligibility and seen the ID when YOU REGISTERED.. Just like you can walk into a bank and make transactions with a SIGNATURE.

Only folks that have ISSUES with the Registrar's version of the voting roles should be required to show ID.. A poll worker should be able to retrieve a PHOTO OF YOU on screen when they log you in. It's NOT rocket science.. It's just lethargic, technologically inept government administration..

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Sure. But just as we lost the race for a technological solution to get pens to work in microgravity during the space race to the Soviets who used pencils, don't put too much faith into technology.

Tried and true paper ballots and a pen works best just as the best recording medium ever invented was invented thousands of years ago - clay tablets. Any electronic voting method can be manipulated and hacked.

 

[PostmodernProph]

Yeah. Voter ID

Democrats oppose voter ID because it discriminates against illegal voters, dead people, felons, and other members of the Democrat voter base......

 

[Truthmatters]

what do you know about the SCOTUS decision last January about the republican partys extensive cheating in elections?

 

[PostmodernProph]

what do you know about the SCOTUS decision last January about the republican partys extensive cheating in elections?

only what you've told us...over and over and over and over.....

 

[westwall]

you refuse facts


on what basis do you claim this SCOTUS case didn't happen?

How about presenting something new, and/or addressing the science and technology aspect of your OP. So far all you have done is post the same thing over and over again. The world knows you hate Republicans. Truly it does. Address your OP.

 

[Truthmatters]

so you deny the cheating is real?

 

[Truthmatters]

In a democracy there is not real government if cheating changes the results of what the people wanted.


you are a traitor to this country if you refuse this is reality

 

[Truthmatters]

what good are tainted elections?

 

[PostmodernProph]

so you deny the cheating is real?

well, since you ask......yes.....the 1960s called....they want their political justifications back......

now, to get the thread back on a science and technology track, photo voter ID would help prevent cheating......as a liberal, why are you afraid of making sure the person voting is the person registered to vote?........

 

[Truthmatters]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage












The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its fight against voter fraud.

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated&#8230


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.




what do you know about this last years scotus decision?

 

[Truthmatters]

see this is what the right does.

They deny out right proven FACTS that are contained in our highest court records.


they are an insane party with no facts in their brains

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its fight against voter fraud.

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.

what do you know about this last years scotus decision?

How will science and technology change what happened in this 30 year old case that nobody but you cares about?

Be specific.


Muh ObamaFoam only sended dis cuz I gibbed it a banana.

 

[Truthmatters]

where is your proof no one in America cares that your party cheats in elections?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

where is your proof no one in America cares that your party cheats in elections?

I didn't say that. I said nobody cares about the 30 year old case that you are so obsessed about.

You should learn how to read.


Muh ObamaFoam only sended dis cuz I gibbed it a banana.

 

[flacaltenn]

so you deny the cheating is real?

Yes -- actually I do.. You're fixated on a 30 year old consent decree.. There is nothing RECENT in this news article you keep posting. Should we be going back to what the DEMS did 30 years ago? Or the new processes they are adopting today to collect information on individual voter preferences and habits?

OTH -- You ignore the topic of your own thread, while other posters are TRYING to discuss the OP issue. As Delta4 noted, some of the rush to adopt NEW tech to voting has introduced problems to the INTEGRITY of record keeping for ballots. There was nothing systemically wrong with machine scanned paper ballots. And as I suggested -- Voter VERIFICATION should be an issue for REGISTRATION and not on Election day -- if government could use technology better..

 

[westwall]

so you deny the cheating is real?

BOTH sides cheat dear. Your continual attack on just one side of it makes one wonder if you think it's OK for your side to do it, but you think it bad for the other side to do it. So which is it....do wish for true reform to occur where NO SIDE gets to get away with it? Or is it OK with you if your side does it?

Case in point. If what is claimed about Hagel is true, should he not be in prison instead of working for Obama?


"A left-leaning columnist raised questions about Sen. Chuck Hagel, his links to a voting machine company and the possible manipulation of votes as long as a decade ago.

Hagel now is President Obama’s nominee to be defense secretary, and columnist Thom Hartmann wrote in 2003 about his possible influence on election victories by George W. Bush and Alabama’s Republican Gov. Bob Riley."



Dems forgive Hagel ?vote-rigging?

 

[Truthmatters]

Silly TM. You really are clueless. Do you even understand caging?

Our courts system understand voter caging and has been trying to protect voters from the republican party because they cage voters