orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
Good video. Worth a watch:
Last edited by a moderator:
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Macroevolution
- Thread starter orogenicman
- Start date
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
lol....so rather than defend your position on the previous thread you simply run away and start another?......
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
negged for bei9ng an asswipe
ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #4
I've come to the conclusion if there's a theory = the same people will argue against it. In the name of his o'mighty god!
Last edited:
ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #5
Their stance is god does everything and so you don't have to explain it with observations.
Last edited:
orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
- Thread starter
- #6
lol....so rather than defend your position on the previous thread you simply run away and start another?......
No comments on the content of the video? Why am I not surprised?
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
did this one contain any evidence elevating macro-evolution to a subject for scientific study?....
watched it.....lols at the misrepresentation of what we believe about macro-evolution (that a fish will give birth to a monkey)......
so basically this guy thinks he succeeds in the debate by depicting micro-evolution to be macro-evolution and therefore, science.......
why no discussion of the argument that humans evolved from single celled organisms?.....THAT is macro-evolution....not beetles evolving into thousands of species of beetle......
watched it.....lols at the misrepresentation of what we believe about macro-evolution (that a fish will give birth to a monkey)......
so basically this guy thinks he succeeds in the debate by depicting micro-evolution to be macro-evolution and therefore, science.......
why no discussion of the argument that humans evolved from single celled organisms?.....THAT is macro-evolution....not beetles evolving into thousands of species of beetle......
Last edited:
orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
- Thread starter
- #8
did this one contain any evidence elevating macro-evolution to a subject for scientific study?....
The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today studying this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
/shrugs.....studying something is not one of the criteria of the scientific method.......testing it, is.......they can study it and argue about it and even draw pictures of it, but unless they are testing it, it isn't science....
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
the lowest common denominator of macro-evolution.....the hurdle you must overcome before you have the authority to argue any other aspect of it.....
did a single celled organism ever evolve into a multi-celled organism......
provide evidence in 3.......2.......1......
did a single celled organism ever evolve into a multi-celled organism......
provide evidence in 3.......2.......1......
orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
- Thread starter
- #11
/shrugs.....studying something is not one of the criteria of the scientific method.......testing it, is.......they can study it and argue about it and even draw pictures of it, but unless they are testing it, it isn't science....
The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today TESTING this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.
What scientists are saying:
Last edited by a moderator:
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today TESTING this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.
can you give me an example of one of these tests of macro-evolution?....
orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
- Thread starter
- #13
Wow, more selective amnesia. You poor dear.
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
right....I forgot that you can't......
orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
- Thread starter
- #15
right....I forgot that you can't......
Translation: You didn't watch the video.
More (which you won't bother reading either):
Macroevolution
ENSI/SENSI Papers & Articles:Macroevolution Lessons
Macroevolution: Examples from the Primate World | Learn Science at Scitable
Evidence of Macroevolution
Macroevolution
Macroevolution | The Biodiversity Lab
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
More (which you won't bother reading either):
if you can't be bothered to write an argument, why should I be bothered to read some article that can't argue back?.....
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
from one of the above.....do you realize that a fossil is evidence that a creature existed, but not of its transition.....it is not evidence of an evolutionary movement....that comes from non-falsifiable assumptions.....FOSSIL EVIDENCE: Don't overlook the abundant fossil evidence, much of it pointing clearly to macroevolution
the rest of the arguments you fear to articulate are no more substantial.....
Lets just agree that there's shitloads more evidence to support the scientific theories about the development of life on earth than the existence of any of our GODS.
Agreed or no?
PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
Lets just agree that there's shitloads more evidence to support the scientific theories about the development of life on earth than the existence of any of our GODS.
Agreed or no?
no, actually.....that's the point of my argument.....taking something for granted is not the equivalent of proof.......
Last edited:
ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #20
This is how it happened...
1. God made the earth in a week
2. God made animals and man
3. God sent a snake into a garden
4. The snake got woman to eat apple and humans become self thinking. God was angry!
5. Now we think and make fun of his o'mighty with science!
Truth straight from the horses mouth!
1. God made the earth in a week
2. God made animals and man
3. God sent a snake into a garden
4. The snake got woman to eat apple and humans become self thinking. God was angry!
5. Now we think and make fun of his o'mighty with science!
Truth straight from the horses mouth!
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 421
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 170
- Replies
- 46
- Views
- 520
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 71
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 55
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 49
- Replies
- 219
- Views
- 899
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8069
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-