Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hmm, I doubt it. I have morals formed from reason and humanism, not out of fear of a sky daddy. These morals focus on the well being of humans, not on my selfish desire to live forever. More likely I'll end up the victim of one of your fellow cult members.If you allow your anger to keep building up you very well may do something you will regret.No...why? What do you think I am? Yahweh? It's not as if I am going to to rub out some kids just because I got my feelings hurt.Angry much?That's precisely what his nonsense is. It's an ever expanding tautology that can be slopped onto any hard earned knowledge, after the fact. It explains nothing, yields no useful predictions, comes without a shred of evidence, and could never be falsified or confirmed. It's a useless, steaming pile.Isn't that merely an exercise in tautology?
.Isn't that merely an exercise in tautology?your entire statement is false - there is no physiology on Earth that is not living and when the metaphysical life is removed the physiology disappears is the proof of the metaphysical and those properties that make it possible and the physical form it has created.
Isn't that merely an exercise in tautology?
your entire statement is false - there is no physiology on Earth that is not living and when the metaphysical life is removed the physiology disappears is the proof of the metaphysical and those properties that make it possible and the physical form it has created.
and therefore the precepts of morals for life's emergence.
Heaped elegantly high though, be fair.It's a useless, steaming pile.
Physiology is a term informed by life, that is why your screed is tautological. The rest, including its relationship to physiology, is incomprehensible to me, I gain no useful information from it.no, or state why you believe it is [tautological]
.Oh really? Show me 5 examples, then. Show me when and how the metaphysical was removed, and how this is not explained by other means that don't require your metaphysical nonsense. Please be specific with all 5 examples.when the metaphysical life is removed the physiology disappears is the proof of the metaphysical
Then we can examine this "good evidence" you claim to have. Or, we can all have a good laugh at your expense.
Oh really? Show me 5 examples, then. Show me when and how the metaphysical was removed
Trump will
Transform the whole European way of living life
By helping Putin ?
You've got no idea.
Trump is destroying liberalism
By exposing its hypocrisies.
You are already half way to being a nazi, bro.Hmm, I doubt it. I have morals formed from reason and humanism, not out of fear of a sky daddy. These morals focus on the well being of humans, not on my selfish desire to live forever. More likely I'll end up the victim of one of your fellow cult members.If you allow your anger to keep building up you very well may do something you will regret.No...why? What do you think I am? Yahweh? It's not as if I am going to to rub out some kids just because I got my feelings hurt.Angry much?That's precisely what his nonsense is. It's an ever expanding tautology that can be slopped onto any hard earned knowledge, after the fact. It explains nothing, yields no useful predictions, comes without a shred of evidence, and could never be falsified or confirmed. It's a useless, steaming pile.Isn't that merely an exercise in tautology?
You know, I tried parsing that out of curiosity. I ended up with a jumble of words without connection.Fauna and Flora both emerged from the initial (metaphysical) life (spiritual) template, take anything that is living as an example ... the physiology the living beings have evolved is created by their spiritual component over time and is itself, the evolution proof of the metaphysical presence in the universe.
if as bing suggests you are not to angry to give a reasonable response to what is as secular as it might be religious in reference to the underpinnings necessary for the initial life templates emergence on Earth in the first place ...
Tell it to the Tsar.The white males has never lost a war
Tell it to the Tsar.The white males has never lost a war
.Tell it to the Tsar.The white males has never lost a war
Only white males has ever beat another white males.
Only white males has ever beat another white males.
IothersI do understand all cultures have differnt standards on morality. But deep down inside I think the majority know right from wrong.Many theists believe it is clear-cut. Humans can only have opinions about morality, and no one’s opinion is any more valid than anyone else’s. This leads them to the conclusion that an objective source of morality must stand apart from, and above, humans. That source, they say, is God. Since atheists, reject God, atheists can have no basis for morality.
This is really two separate arguments: (1) that God is the source of objective morality and humans can learn morality from God and (2) that humans on their own have no way to know what is moral and what is not.
Can atheists be moral? - Atheist Alliance International
Is that in the Koran, as a matter of curiosity?Let me as you this is it diffcult to say its wrong to have sex with a 9 year old woman and marry her
Is that in the Koran, as a matter of curiosity?Let me as you this is it diffcult to say its wrong to have sex with a 9 year old woman and marry her
Let me ask you this. Is it difficult to say grabbing women by the pussy without invitation is wrong? But why do some millions accept this?
