California School to Monitor Students' Social-Media Activities

Kondor3

Cafeteria Centrist
Jul 29, 2009
33,577
9,638
1,340
Illinois, USA
California school district hires firm to monitor students' social media

By Michael Martinez, CNN - updated 10:46 AM EDT, Sat September 14, 2013

120627103919-facebook-homepage-screen-netiquette-story-top.jpg


Facebook will be just one of the social media sites being monitored

Los Angeles (CNN) -- A suburban Los Angeles school district is now looking at the public postings on social media by middle and high school students, searching for possible violence, drug use, bullying, truancy and suicidal threats.

The district in Glendale, California, is paying $40,500 to a firm to monitor and report on 14,000 middle and high school students' posts on Twitter, Facebook and other social media for one year.

Though critics liken the monitoring to government stalking, school officials and their contractor say the purpose is student safety.

As classes began this fall, the district awarded the contract after it earlier paid the firm, Geo Listening, $5,000 last spring to conduct a pilot project monitoring 9,000 students at three high schools and a middle school. Among the results was a successful intervention with a student "who was speaking of ending his life" on his social media, said Chris Frydrych, CEO of the firm.

That intervention was significant because two students in the district committed suicide the past two years, said Superintendent Richard Sheehan. The suicides occurred at a time when California has reduced mental health services in schools, Sheehan said.

...

In fact, no student has yet to be disciplined under the monitoring, but it's not out of the question if analysts find a message warranting action, such as a threat of a campus shooting, Sheehan said this week.

"I can see turning it over to police. That would be a situation in which discipline would follow," he said.

Frydrych's firm scours the social media postings of Glendale students aged 13 and older -- the age at which parental permission isn't required for the school's contracted monitoring -- and sends a daily report to principals on which students' comments could be causes for concern, Frydrych said.

The company won't disclose its methods and practices in gathering the students' messages, but it does use key words in its searches. The firm also didn't disclose how it confirms the youths are indeed students of the district.

To do the work, Frydrych employs no more than 10 full-time staffers -- as well as "a larger portion" of contract workers across the globe who labor a maximum of four hours a day because "the content they read is so dark and heavy," Frydrych said.

...

Geo Listening also monitors whether students are talking about drug use, cutting class or violence. The firm even ascertains whether pupils are using their smartphone during class time, Frydrych said.

While critics say the Glendale schools' contract is an invasion of privacy, Frydrych said his firm helps schools bridge a digital-age communications "chasm."

"Parents and school district personnel -- they are not able to effectively listen to the conversation where it's happening now," Frydrych said. "The notion about talking in class is about as old-fashioned as a Studebaker, no offense to the makers of the car.

"When was the last time you sent a kid to the principal's office for talking in class too much? I just don't think it happens too much. So what we kept seeing is the chasm keeps building between how students communicate and the ability to tell adults about what's going on in their lives," he said. "I thought we could bridge that gap."

Some experts in digital media and privacy, however, take exception.

"This is the government essentially hiring a contractor to stalk the social media of the kids," said Lee Tien, senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit that defends privacy, free speech and consumer rights.

"When the government -- and public schools are part of the government -- engages in any kind of line-crossing and to actually go and gather information about people away from school, that crosses a line," Tien said.

...

California district hires firm to monitor students' social media - CNN.com

========================================

This opens-up a good half-dozen cans of worms... maybe more... ranging from Protection of the Young to Invasion of Privacy to Big Brother-ism to Inappropriate Interpretation and Application of Law, and on and on and on...

Potentially scary stuff, for Privacy Advocates, regardless of the letter of the law, or narrow, enabling interpretations, and regardless of whether or not such postings are (ostensibly) considered 'public' in nature.
 
Last edited:
Good.

Kids are idiots and need monitoring.

And since they don't work and pay taxes, the only rights they have are those given to them by the adults in their lives.
 
There would be some privacy concerns regarding FB where you can choose your privacy settings.

If they are monitoring this from school based computers, or cell phones and I pads on school time, then they likely have not only the right, but some responsibility to do so. Whether they have enough common sense to use the information appropriately is yet to be determined. My cyber dollar is on the side that says they don't.
 
Good.

Kids are idiots and need monitoring.

And since they don't work and pay taxes, the only rights they have are those given to them by the adults in their lives.

Not really. SCOTUS has ruled minors have 'fundamental rights.'
 
There would be some privacy concerns regarding FB where you can choose your privacy settings.

If they are monitoring this from school based computers, or cell phones and I pads on school time, then they likely have not only the right, but some responsibility to do so. Whether they have enough common sense to use the information appropriately is yet to be determined. My cyber dollar is on the side that says they don't.

What nanny State does? It's NONE of their business off school property. Bottom line. And I'm with SFC Ollie on this...I too thought this was the responsibility of the parents.
 
The FB, depending on the settings, is public domain, in which the students have no expectation of privacy.

On the other hand, I don't like the feel of the school looking over student shoulders.
 
I don't know, the info is public...

Just set your profile settings to private and don't "friend" the school or any of the administration. Problem solved.

My employer before I retired set up a FB page. I had them as a friend. But I got a little suspicious that they might be reading my page, not that I have anything to hide. But the thought of that is just creepy.
 
"Just because we CAN do a thing does not mean that we SHOULD do a thing."
 
Last edited:
"People say that's not private: It's public on Facebook. I say that's just semantics. The question is what is the school doing? It's not stumbling into students -- like a teacher running across a student on the street. This is the school sending someone to watch them," Tien said.

No, it’s not ‘semantics,’ it’s case law.

There is no expectation of privacy when personal information is willingly provided to a private third-party entity, such as an ISP or Facebook.
 

Forum List

Back
Top