California High School Teacher "Accidentally" Fires Gun in Classroom During Safety Lesson

More gun lovers fetishes come true. But, of course, this would not have happened if the kids had carried guns and shot the teacher before she injured someone.
 
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have two opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have have to opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
But those guys shouldnt be here in the first place. At least that is my argument..
 
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have have to opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
But those guys shouldnt be here in the first place. At least that is my argument.. Put put every individual into a bubble if it makes you seem more credible.

Why don't you write on another forum? I'm so interested
 
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have have to opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
He's a moderate at best. Calling everyone you disagree with a Conservative is not only shallow, but also inaccurate, since the people that disagree with you can be Libertarians, Moderates, Conservatives, OR Republicans.

As for a person being shot, the person being shot at should have been armed, and the illegal shouldn't have been here in the first place, and even if they should have been there, the fact that they shot someone isn't an argument for gun control.

Being predictable doesn't mean you have a valid argument. Not only that, but "predictable" isn't a counter by itself, and also doesn't invalidate the argument, you only use it in place of a valid argument because you don't have one.
 
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have have to opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
He's a moderate at best. Calling everyone you disagree with a Conservative is not only shallow, but also inaccurate, since the people that disagree with you can be Libertarians, Moderates, Conservatives, OR Republicans.

As for a person being shot, the person being shot at should have been armed, and the illegal shouldn't have been here in the first place, and even if they should have been there, the fact that they shot someone isn't an argument for gun control.

Being predictable doesn't mean you have a valid argument. Not only that, but "predictable" isn't a counter by itself, and also doesn't invalidate the argument, you only use it in place of a valid argument because you don't have one.

upload_2018-3-14_12-16-17.jpeg
 


You know the link states the guy is a reserve police officer...right? You saw that...right?

Here are all the states that already arm teachers......so....you are behind the historical curve on this one...

Here’s all the states where teachers already carry guns in the classroom

Florida is on the verge of becoming the 15th state to arm teachers after Gov. Rick Scott signed an omnibus bill Friday allowing school staff to undergo law enforcement training to carry guns in the classroom.

Although the notion may seem radical, at least 14 states already arm teachers, according to a VICE News review of state laws and interviews with education department officials and school board associations around the country. Those states are Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Washington.


Another 16 states give local school boards the authority to decide whether school staff can carry guns, either explicitly or through legal loopholes, but officials said they didn’t know of any instances of armed teachers in those states.
 
he better be charged
the old ''unloaded but loaded gun'' trick

kids around--no threat--finger should never be near the trigger
reserve police officer--just more proof humans are not perfect/idiots/etc
proof he should not own a weapon
 
Small price to pay for a second amendment

Accidents happen


Actually, reducing gun murder, gun crime and violent crime is a great thing to have because Americans own and carry guns...

We went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 17 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2017...guess what happened...

-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%


Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
 
one incident doesnt prove anything..
Or is the left now embracing the one size fits all mantra? Ready to talk about islam?

Cons will whine all day about the woman that was shot by an illegal alien as if one incident proves everything everywhere that any con said at any time anywhere.

Give it a rest, you derps are just so stupidly predictable now. You have have to opposite thoughts at the same moment and immediately declare them both to be absolutes. :cuckoo:
He's a moderate at best. Calling everyone you disagree with a Conservative is not only shallow, but also inaccurate, since the people that disagree with you can be Libertarians, Moderates, Conservatives, OR Republicans.

As for a person being shot, the person being shot at should have been armed, and the illegal shouldn't have been here in the first place, and even if they should have been there, the fact that they shot someone isn't an argument for gun control.

Being predictable doesn't mean you have a valid argument. Not only that, but "predictable" isn't a counter by itself, and also doesn't invalidate the argument, you only use it in place of a valid argument because you don't have one.

View attachment 182620
Oh look, a meme instead of an argument. I guess that means I was right that you don't have one.

I don't blame you for immediately giving up when faced with my illustrious presence. Maybe next time, you'll check to see if I'm viewing the thread before you post~
 

Forum List

Back
Top