Second teacher at Missouri high school caught peddling porn on OnlyFans

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Doing porn, on average, your family will find out between 7-10 days.
Someone anonymously called the school and told them her screen name.. caught.

How is that not an invasion of her privacy?

I don't support teacher's doing this, but ...

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There is a reasonable question that good order and discipline is lost in a classroom when the students know you are in porn.

Even if there is no fault or moral injunction involved, it may become impossible to actually run a classroom once that type of information is out in the open which is exactly what happened as far as I can tell. It is unlikely that you become that successful and also maintain anonymity. Not that it matters to her to be honest when she can become a millionaire so fast. She can start her own school.

How did they find out and why do they know it is really her? I had a fellow teacher accused of sleeping with a student. His reputation was ruined by a false report!

I do not condone her actions, but I am playing devil's advocate here.

 

[martybegan]

Nope. I had great parents!

No, you were a boring kid.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No, you were a boring kid.

Oh really? You knew me back then? I just had parents that would not put up with actions like that.

My three kids have never done anything like that either and they are all very successful.

 

[lennypartiv]

YOu mean that song where the dumbass redneck threatens violence if you do things he don't like?

When in Rome...

 

[Crepitus]

When in Rome...

Are you saying rome is fulla dumbass rednecks?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yes we do. And the current Supreme Court will help take us there.

Which religion do you think they will choose to violate the First Amendment?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

How is that not an invasion of her privacy?

I don't support teacher's doing this, but ...

Uh... she is on a public site.
If she was having private orgies at her home, that would be private.
If she was having orgies and taking video of it and putting it on the internet for all to see - that is not private.

 

[FA_Q2]

How is that not an invasion of her privacy?

I don't support teacher's doing this, but ...

Because it is a public action. Placing yourself on video and then releasing that you customers means that it is public. You do not get to claim that someone violates your privacy by releasing content you already released to the public.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Because it is a public action. Placing yourself on video and then releasing that you customers means that it is public. You do not get to claim that someone violates your privacy by releasing content you already released to the public.

The way I understand it, the release of her images is pursuant to a business transaction. How is that not private?

I am playing devil's advocate here.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Uh... she is on a public site.
If she was having private orgies at her home, that would be private.
If she was having orgies and taking video of it and putting it on the internet for all to see - that is not private.

Can you see her product without subscribing? Would her students be able to access it, or is just knowing she has an account is damning enough?

 

[FA_Q2]

The way I understand it, the release of her images is pursuant to a business transaction. How is that not private?

I am playing devil's advocate here.

No one needs to release anything. As an onlyfans content creator, she is advertising her 'services.' If this was a private matter you would need to know her to locate her website. That is not the case. I can go on onlyfans.com right now and browse through all the different creators to my hearts content.

That is all public. The images themselves are irrelevant beyond their mere existence.

None of that really matters to my original point though, that she can be fired due to the mere fact of her other activities impacting the classroom itself. No business, let alone one that deals with educating children, is required to keep an employee that places an undue burden on the company or significantly impacts the completion of individual duties. Even if that is not the fault of the employee or company and even in the case the release of the information was not kosher. That the classroom's good order and discipline may be lost is enough to warrant laying off an employee. The kids knew and that is all that would matter in that case. However, the information was public anyway.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Can you see her product without subscribing? Would her students be able to access it, or is just knowing she has an account is damning enough?

Of course her students would be able to access it. All they have to do is check "yes I am 18 or older" - and their in. Pay like $3 done

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Of course her students would be able to access it. All they have to do is check "yes I am 18 or older" - and their in. Pay like $3 done

Then the fault would be with them for lying. How can she prevent them from breaking the law?

As I said, I am playing devil's advocate for arguments sake.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Of course her students would be able to access it. All they have to do is check "yes I am 18 or older" - and their in. Pay like $3 done

how many people under 18 have credit cards required to pay the 3 bucks?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

how many people under 18 have credit cards required to pay the 3 bucks?

Who cares? Irrelevant
Teachers K-12 should not be allowed to be a porn star and still teach.
End of point

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Who cares? Irrelevant
Teachers K-12 should not be allowed to be a porn star and still teach.
End of point

as long as they are not doing it at school I disagree.

But, what else is new