WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 27,974
- 17,073
- 1,415
Not a member of the witch hunt paradeShe triggered Dimwinger morons,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not a member of the witch hunt paradeShe triggered Dimwinger morons,
Why since you have not been specific.For what purpose? Be specific what she did wrong.
Her understanding of the PSA is sound.Why since you have not been specific.
Her understanding of the PSA will not stand scrutiny, so that's why Smith wants a definitive ruling now.
Not in the slightest. But you can expound if you want.Her understanding of the PSA is sound.
Cannon should not be allowed to instruct the jury that Trump's faulty interpretation of the PRA should even be considered.Smith wants to force Cannon to hand him a win by finalizing jury instructions that will make conviction more likely.
This Bidenista is going to be PISSED!
What faulty interpretation?Cannon should not be allowed to instruct the jury that Trump's faulty interpretation of the PRA should even be considered.
If anything she should instruct them that the PRA CANNOT factor into their deliberations because the documents Trump stole aren't even covered by the PRA.
lol, they always get it wrong. Trump was not indicted 91 times….
Gotta agree4 bullshit indictments, 91 bullshit counts….I think…
They are always fucking wrong.
They are feelings…not facts.
Lefty men are pretty much chicks.
99% of conservative women are tougher than these limp wristed woke cuck asshole “Men”.
WowJack Smith’s wife made a documentary about Michelle Obama.
NO CORRUPTION HERE.
Hey, you cult fucks who demanded Clarence Thomas recuse himself from the Colorado ballot case because of his wife…
I NOTICE YOU HYPOCRITICAL PIECES OF GARBAGE HAVE NO ISSUE WITH SMITH’S WIFE BEING A MICHELLE OBAMA BIOGRAPHER WHO DIRECTED A FLUFF DOCUMENTARY ON BIG MIKE.
SUCH
FUCKING
FRAUDS
Wow
No possible agenda or influence there.
91 counts, fool.lol, they always get it wrong. Trump was not indicted 91 times….
Constant bogus references to the 91 indictments from you liars.91 counts, fool.
Trump was indicted on every one of those counts.Constant bogus references to the 91 indictments from you liars.
It’s a half dozen indictments containing 91 countsTrump was indicted on every one of those counts.
The indictments cover all of the counts listed in each indictment, dupe. So it isn’t wrong to say Trump has 91 indictments.It’s a half dozen indictments containing 91 counts
Stop lying