- Moderator
- #41
I am alright with any living slaveholder paying reparations to their former slaves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They'll have to come take my money......and my guns.
well that is the plan they have
perhaps you've noticed the
anti law anti cop theme they espouse
Nice photo for the 17th century!Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
They'll have to come take my money......and my guns.
well that is the plan they have
perhaps you've noticed the
anti law anti cop theme they espouse
along with their candidate
Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
Except babies....and cops.....
painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
Looks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
Lewis Hayden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do the blacks and Indians that owned slaves have to pay too, or just white people that owned nary a slave? And will the Muslims be paying, cause they still own and sell them. just sayin...
Anyone ever hear of the concept of "root cause"? Root cause was Africa. Or, perhaps we should call it "Roots' Cause"? I remember as an 8 year old watching Roots and seeing old, fat, swasbucklling white men capturing clearly better in shape African men to keep as slaves. Really? Was it that easy for old scurvy, gout ridden pouch bellies to go to Africa and grab anyone they wanted? Methinks not. Clearly, these white thugs had to have had some assistance.
the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
Sounds like Anthony Johnson's decendents should be on the hook for reparations? He pushed an African tradition on America. At least, America was smart enough to stop.
Do the blacks and Indians that owned slaves have to pay too, or just white people that owned nary a slave? And will the Muslims be paying, cause they still own and sell them. just sayin...
I am not paying shit. Brown skin Mediteraneans did not own Black Slaves in America.
It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!the first legal slave owner in America was black so they should sue themselves
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
Lewis Hayden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I was not trying to challenge that Anthony Johnson was not a black slave owner; however, why try to pass a photo of someone else as him?It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
Lewis Hayden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Damn, you mean they couldn't find a picture of someone from 1650 so they used one from 1810 instead... why those guys tried to fool us....BUT was the information correct?.... Seems when you Progs do this shit, you ALWAYS forget about the facts!
As an example of what he might have looked like 350 years ago?I was not trying to challenge that Anthony Johnson was not a black slave owner; however, why try to pass a photo of someone else as him?It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
Lewis Hayden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Damn, you mean they couldn't find a picture of someone from 1650 so they used one from 1810 instead... why those guys tried to fool us....BUT was the information correct?.... Seems when you Progs do this shit, you ALWAYS forget about the facts!
I'm sure lots of people care. When it come to history, if there is a picture of the historical figure it's kind of nice if it is an actually picture of the person. Otherwise, leave the picture off. That being said, I'm sure that no one on this thread is responsible for that photo shop work with the captions, it just something being spread around.It is a photo of Lewis HaydenLooks like a photograph to me. If it is a painted portrait, then it is quite amazing.painted portrait or camera obscura (a tracing of a projected image)Nice photo for the 17th century!
I suspect that the photo we see is not of the actual black slave owner that has become a topic of this discusion.
Lewis Hayden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
who cares
had you been so concerned when the democrats at the DNC Convention
used the Russian black sea fleet to honor the vets
--LOL