- Nov 29, 2008
- 25,786
- 11,295
- 940
Yeah I know you think that but it doesn't work like that. I just told you what they did here to us in just one instance.Actually no I do not agree with eminent domain laws in most cases as its to easy to screw over the landowner without proper compensation. These pipeline companies majors should use their own money and outright buy the land that they desire to use instead of stealing it through legislative measures or by rook and crook. Its to damn recent these local assholes here made up a quit claim deed giving our crooked neighbors free reign to steal truckloads of our walnut trees and they also took a good little chunk of land without properly compensating us for it. They didn't follow the law, they again used the sheriff to threaten me with arrest if I didn't shut my mouth about their illegal acts.I don't find the clarity in that as you do. No I don't believe that one should be able to damage another person's property but to protest peacefully there should be no doubt that this is legal to do. Also if someone puts something on my property I didn't approve of, sell the rights to do such or give permission so such could be done I should be able to rip it out at any time too. Infrastructure could be anything they say it is from a phone line to aBut courts can too easily obfuscate under the color of law. Sorry I do not trust the current justice system or these pipeline companies and many legislators either at this point.
So basically protesters should be able to walk onto property and try to damage equipment that may harm them or the environment if broken in a certain way?
This law does NOTHING to stop people protesting.
pipeline or even a receiver for radio reception.
Actually under this law the term infrastructure is pretty well defined.
And I guess from your post you don't believe in eminent domain or easements.
Simple, the legislators can write in their proposed legislation that peaceful protest are not prosecutable and define beyond a doubt that easements are not ownership.
Eminent domain is not stealing, and in some cases is needed because one person being able to stop an infrastructure project would make them impossible to implement.
The people are compensated, and can sue for more compensation if they feel it is insufficient.