Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
worms can't help being wormsUnder Biden- the Usurper President - all we hear is lies lies and more lies!
What worms they are!
I can point you to evidence, odd0. I am unable to make your brain function.Bluto
The piece states that the WH approved the DOJ to investigate the missing classified material. Where does it state that President Biden had knowledge of the warrant execution before it happened?
Id. The White House was involved in the criminal probe (even eliminating the Trump invocation of executive privilege) as early as this spring. Being involved, in some extraordinary detail, is demonstrative that they were being kept apprised by DOJ.Long before it professed no prior knowledge of the raid on Donald Trump's estate, the Biden White House worked directly with the Justice Department and National Archives to instigate the criminal probe into alleged mishandling of documents, allowing the FBI to review evidence retrieved from Mar-a-Lago this spring and eliminating the 45th president's claims to executive privilege, according to contemporaneous government documents reviewed by Just the News.
You'd think they simply wouldn't do it.The White House knew that the documents were being requested. I don't necessarily think they took part in the search warrant as that would cross lines. I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were given a heads up about it but I'd think the DOJ would be pretty damn careful to insulate the WH from a move like this.
The President did the right thing by approving the return of the classified documents.I can point you to evidence, odd0. I am unable to make your brain function.
I will however deign to stoop low enough to give you a tantalizing tidbit:
Id. The White House was involved in the criminal probe (even eliminating the Trump invocation of executive privilege) as early as this spring. Being involved, in some extraordinary detail, is demonstrative that they were being kept apprised by DOJ.
DOJ didn’t just spring the extraordinary action of raiding the former President’s new home, without having kept Brandon advised. Snap out of it. The mere idea of that is absurd.
Nonsense. The Administration was already on notice that the docs had been declassified. I bet they didn’t so advise Judge Reinhardt, though.The President did the right thing by approving the return of the classified documents.
It does mean that the FBI and the SOJ has already alerted Brandon to a criminal probe concerning Trump over these documents and that the President then facilitated that so-called “investigation.” You can close your eyes to it, but it doesn’t disappear.That does not infer that they directed the actions
Standing alone, that action doesn’t necessarily establish that they told Brandon in advance about the search warrant. But common sense says they HAD to have kept Brandon in the loop. Plus, it doesn’t stand alone. Once the President has been “read in” on the “criminal investigation” it isn’t believable that he wouldn’t also be read in on the political and historical raidor had knowledge of the steps to retrieve the documents by the DOJ.
I wasn’t referring to the article. I was talking about using obvious common sense.The article doesn’t claim that either.
Clearly the documents were not declassified.Nonsense. The Administration was already on notice that the docs had been declassified. I bet they didn’t so advise Judge Reinhardt, though.
It does mean that the FBI and the SOJ has already alerted Brandon to a criminal probe concerning Trump over these documents and that the President then facilitated that so-called “investigation.” You can close your eyes to it, but it doesn’t disappear.
Standing alone, that action doesn’t necessarily establish that they told Brandon in advance about the search warrant. But common sense says they HAD to have kept Brandon in the loop. Plus, it doesn’t stand alone. Once the President has been “read in” on the “criminal investigation” it isn’t believable that he wouldn’t also be read in on the political and historical raid
I wasn’t referring to the article. I was talking about using obvious common sense.
What makes you believe the documents were declassified?Not clear. Not true
Do you ask any intelligible “questions?”
I’ve already posted it here at USMB several times already. I’m not inclined to do your grunt work for you. Just look it up this time. Try Google. Enter Kash Patel. Maybe enter Breitbart. Maybe consider putting in that search and dating back to May of this year. May 5 if memory serves.What makes you believe the documents were declassified?
Again, do you know the rules of English sentence construction?If they were then the issue with the National Archives would not have been an issue.
What makes you so sure they weren't?What makes you believe the documents were declassified?
If they were then the issue with the National Archives would not have been an issue.
I think we're in the plausible deniability area.Do you honestly believe Biden didn't know? You're a fool if you do.
All the actions to this point.What makes you so sure they weren't?
The government and the media?
Trust them they aren't lying this time.
All we have is DOJ provided leaks and media supposition.All the actions to this point.
And the indictment coming down.
We have an judge approved warrant and it's execution.All we have is DOJ provided leaks and media supposition.
Your indictment has to overcome the Hillary precedent.
Magistrate.We have an judge approved warrant and it's execution.
Same difference.Magistrate.
