Bernie waffles on gun control

[Votto]

Sanders says he supports repealing gun manufacture immunity

Now Hillary and Bernie are in moral combat to see who can take the most guns away from American citizens.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Did you copy and paste the wrong link?

 

[Votto]

Did you copy and paste the wrong link?

Yes. I can't keep track of all the articles bashing Progs. Its gets confusing sometimes.

 

[RandallFlagg]

COMMENTARY: Obama wrong on changes to hostage policy - Delaware State News

Now Hillary and Bernie are in moral combat to see who can take the most guns away from American citizens.

You know, these "gun control" folks always amaze me. I am 72 years young - have owned guns since I was 8 years old and have never killed a soul that the government of the United States didn't order me to. Yet, these clowns on the left, who are always guarded by men with guns, HONESTLY believe that "if there were no guns - there would be no crime".

Funny, one need only to look at Colorado and Sandy Hook to understand the problem. MENTAL ILLNESS and the left's insistence that mentally ill MONSTERS NOT be locked up. in nearly every case (sans terrorism) the bad guy has been crazier than a shit-house rat. Want to solve the gun problem? Lock these crazy ass kids up and never allow them to walk our streets again.

 

[Pogo]

Sanders says he supports repealing gun manufacture immunity

Now Hillary and Bernie are in moral combat to see who can take the most guns away from American citizens.

Whatever this is supposed to be, it was already done a week ago. It's not about "gun control" -- it's a legal issue.

 

[saveliberty]

You out Hillary Hillary Bernie!

 

[Katzndogz]

It will never happen. The supreme court has ruled on gun manufacturer immunity a dozen times.

 

[Auld Phart]

Just another reason not to vote for either.

bring suit against a manufacturer, not because the product is defective, but because someone misused it?

Ridiculous

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Just another reason not to vote for either.

bring suit against a manufacturer, not because the product is defective, but because someone misused it?

Ridiculous

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers.

 

[Auld Phart]

Just another reason not to vote for either.

bring suit against a manufacturer, not because the product is defective, but because someone misused it?

Ridiculous

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers.

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers

Really?

"She would also push to repeal a law backed by the National Rifle Association that prevents crime victims from suing gun manufacturers."

Hillary Clinton Unveils Plan for Major New Gun Restrictions

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Just another reason not to vote for either.

bring suit against a manufacturer, not because the product is defective, but because someone misused it?

Ridiculous

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers.

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers

Really?

"She would also push to repeal a law backed by the National Rifle Association that prevents crime victims from suing gun manufacturers."

Hillary Clinton Unveils Plan for Major New Gun Restrictions

Yes.

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures is not going to suddenly make gun dealers or manufacturers suddenly liable for people using their products to commit crimes, just like the Louisville Slugger company can't be held liable for someone beating a mugging victim to death. It's entirely a non-issue, as both Bernie and Hillary well know.

As the crazy lady said, SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.

 

[Auld Phart]

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures

and yet, the 'lady' says she is going to try.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures

and yet, the 'lady' says she is going to try.

Yes, she's going to "try" to repeal an entirely meaningless law.

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

 

[Auld Phart]

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

Odd, it appears that is exactly what she is suggesting

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

Odd, it appears that is exactly what she is suggesting

Isn't politics wonderful? Things can "appear" to be whatever you want them to.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Both Bernie and Hillary are pandering to the anti-gun people, just as the gun people are pandering to their base when they clutch their pearls about "avalanches of frivolous lawsuits" putting them out of business.

It doesn't actually mean anything, either way.

 

[bripat9643]

Just another reason not to vote for either.

bring suit against a manufacturer, not because the product is defective, but because someone misused it?

Ridiculous

Neither Sanders or Clinton is suggesting bringing suit against gun manufacturers.

That doesn't start until they get elected.

 

[bripat9643]

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures

and yet, the 'lady' says she is going to try.

Yes, she's going to "try" to repeal an entirely meaningless law.

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

If it's so "meaningless" then why are the leftwing turds always whining about it? Before the law was past group after group was lining up to sue gun manufacturers because people used guns to kill other people. Even if they won every suit, they could still go under from the expense of defending themselves from all these lawsuits.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures

and yet, the 'lady' says she is going to try.

Yes, she's going to "try" to repeal an entirely meaningless law.

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

If it's so "meaningless" then why are the leftwing turds always whining about it? Before the law was past group after group was lining up to sue gun manufacturers because people used guns to kill other people. Even if they won every suit, they could still go under from the expense of defending themselves from all these lawsuits.

Exhibit A.

 

[bripat9643]

Repealing a redundant and nonsensical special protection given to gun manufactures

and yet, the 'lady' says she is going to try.

Yes, she's going to "try" to repeal an entirely meaningless law.

That's not the same as suggesting that gun manufacturers actually be held liable.

If it's so "meaningless" then why are the leftwing turds always whining about it? Before the law was past group after group was lining up to sue gun manufacturers because people used guns to kill other people. Even if they won every suit, they could still go under from the expense of defending themselves from all these lawsuits.

Exhibit A.

Exhibit A of what case?