Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
I'll ask this again: Do you believe that a unique party to a case must have counsel separately briefing the court or not?
Ask away- an imaginary person is not a party to marriage- and that is what you are claiming.
...Obergefell says that preventing marriage- harms the children gay couples have.
Why do you want to harm children?
Obergefell also said that children are beneficiaries of the marriage contract. As such, they required separate legal briefing to the court as to their stake in said benefits. Why do you want to deny these crucial parties to the marriage contract required representation briefing the courts?