On Thursday the Supreme Court upheld the University of Texas’ affirmative action policies and shot down claims by Abigail Fisher that the policy was unconstitutional. Although Fisher claimed that she was denied entry to the University of Texas because she was white; obviously her spot had been taken by some student of color who was less qualified than she was.
However, during the case, it was revealed that Fisher had lower grades than all but 47 students who were admitted to UT that year. Of the students who were admitted to Texas with grades lower than Fisher’s, 42 of the 47 were white. Instead of Kanye-shrugging her shoulders and resigning herself to another school, she decided to sue.
As a legacy student whose parents had attended the school, she felt she should have been afforded the opportunity of hopscotching past the more qualified candidates because … well … white privilege.
I agree that there was no case here but you don't understand what "legacy student" means. There is no white privilege anywhere here. Quite the opposite.
Legacy student policies do tend to favor whites disproportionately. That's pretty obvious.
No, it isn't obvious when you factor in the population numbers.
The population numbers? What?! The University of Texas was once segregated. So legacy enrollment will naturally be disproportionately white. That's like 5th Grade arithmetic we're dealing with
You don't really understand how any of that works do you? UT was integrated 40 years ago. Right there is possibly two legacy generations for blacks in that time. The Legacy Program won't be disproportionately white, it will be proportionally white unless there actually is some racism going on there, but that isn't what the article was saying any way.
I'm pretty sure you don't understand what you are arguing.