Autopsy of a Dead Coup

[candycorn]

16 Trump campaign officials met with Russian operatives during which time Russians were hacking DNC computers. How did is do?

Seth Rich hacked the DNC....payback for fucking over Bernie....and the Clintons had him murdered for it. But hey, when your life is all about fairy tales, why would you care about the truth?

I'll bet you believe in the Easter Bunny as well. The Russians hacked the DNC servers. Seth Rich is another myth that Trumpers perpetuate. Their fairy tales.

Very true. Either that or the Clintons have become the most prolific mass murderers of all time.

It’s comical what Trump fluffers would have you believe. As I havealways said. Over 3/4 of Trumps supporters want to have his baby...the rest of the supporters are female.

wow, insults and no substance. Same ol same ol with you.

Seth Rich, shameful what the clinton's did to him. shameful. Julian Assange has provided info on this poor fellow. you ignore it. no money removed from Rich's wallet. It's what a hit would look like. And Assange has stated the Wikileaks info came from Rich.

If you can’t trust a felons holed up in an embassy to avoid prosecution, who can you trust?

 

[jc456]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Just about every Democrat is running for president, which means they are constantly in campaign mode, which means nothing they say has to be accurate or honest.
Running for president allows them to lie with impunity.
Every single Democrat pledged in front of the sheister and race-hustling bigot AL Sharpton to support reparations. How many were serious?

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

True, but now they don't have to feel guilty anymore.
Some of the stuff they say isn't just dishonest, but seditious.
Politicians in campaign mode can say stupid shit like, "WE Must FIGHT TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK......TRUMP IS A MURDERING RACIST. ......HE BETRAYED OUR COUNTRY.....
HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS!!!!!!

when one has no integrity or objectivity.

 

[jc456]

16 Trump campaign officials met with Russian operatives during which time Russians were hacking DNC computers. How did is do?

Seth Rich hacked the DNC....payback for fucking over Bernie....and the Clintons had him murdered for it. But hey, when your life is all about fairy tales, why would you care about the truth?

I'll bet you believe in the Easter Bunny as well. The Russians hacked the DNC servers. Seth Rich is another myth that Trumpers perpetuate. Their fairy tales.

Very true. Either that or the Clintons have become the most prolific mass murderers of all time.

It’s comical what Trump fluffers would have you believe. As I havealways said. Over 3/4 of Trumps supporters want to have his baby...the rest of the supporters are female.

wow, insults and no substance. Same ol same ol with you.

Seth Rich, shameful what the clinton's did to him. shameful. Julian Assange has provided info on this poor fellow. you ignore it. no money removed from Rich's wallet. It's what a hit would look like. And Assange has stated the Wikileaks info came from Rich.

If you can’t trust a felons holed up in an embassy to avoid prosecution, who can you trust?

I trust the guy that had the documents. and where he said he got the documents from. that's who I believe. I don't believe someone who puts a PC in her basement, bleach bits it and her phones to destroy evidence.

 

[busybee01]

People from the same organization. Hacking is a crime. Hiring hackers is as well

So now you are trying to explain your “attention grabbing “ headline. You never named the organization involved in the crime. You said Russians. Russian is a nationality, not an organization. You have no connection between the hackers and the folks meeting with the unnamed Trump people. Keep trying, what else do you have to do?

The Russian government was implied. First rule of headline writing is to sacrifice details for brevity.

Watch this, you dunce



Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????

QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.



If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.

The information came from Steele's sources in the Kremlin. I am sure that we have sources in the Kremlin as well. Comey said that some of the incidents in the dossier had been verified.

Putin clearly wanted Trump to win. Russia bought ads on social media to boost Trump. Russians hacked the DNC servers and mixed in false information. Paul Manafort gave campaign documents and polling data to a Russian associate with ties to Russian intelligence. Russian oligarchs provided financing for Trump's projects. That means Putin provided financing for Trump's projects.

There is NO evidence against Democrats. They were the victims.

"There is NO evidence against Democrats. They were the victims."


Watch me ram those lying words back down your lying throat:


1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.


10. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.

Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele


11. Adam Schiff is the head Democrat on the Intelligence Committee
Remember....if not for double standards, the Democrats would have no standards at all....
The Dems are claiming that the Trump folks colluded with a foreign power to collect damaging material about a political adversary....
And remember: to know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

Schiff orchestrated a plan to get naked and 'kompromat' pictures of Trump, from the Ukrainians!
The problem is.....the 'Ukrainians' who contacted him were comedians who exposed Schiff and the Democrats for what they are.

"Adam Schiff sent his staff to try and collect 'classified materials for the FBI' after Russian pranksters told him Putin has NAKED blackmail pictures of Trump

Adam Schiff spoofed with Russian claim of nude Trump pic | Daily Mail Online




12.“Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had xtensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages…

From Democrat Warner:
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.

"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.



Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …

"Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele



“ Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …”
"...would rather not have a paper trail...."



“,,,an honest person would ask themselves how’d they react if that was a text message between Donald Trump, Jr., and some fixer paid for by Sergei Lavrov in which he sought a meeting with someone and didn’t want a paper trail.”
Why Did Mark Warner Try to Secretly Meet With Trump Dossier Author and a Blacklisted Russian Oligarch?



13. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.




14. While Hillary Clinton sat on the Senate Armed Services Committee Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele

Then, as Sec’y of State, presiding over The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) she suddenly reversed her previous opposition to the Russian State Nuclear Agency controlling 20% of the uranium extraction in the United States.

“Clinton’s CFIUS committee approved a Russian takeover of US uranium assets at the same time that the Russian company’s chairman was giving substantial sums of money to Clinton’s foundation. There is no evidence that Clinton ever divulged this blatant, if not potentially corrupt, conflict of interest.” Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p. 70-71

15. BTW….Russia itself handed some $2.6 million directly to the Clinton’s foundation, at the same time that Hillary Clinton was rubber-stamping the Uranium One deal that authorized the Russian State Nuclear Agency to gain control of some 20% of the uranium extracted in the United States.

“A Canadian company called Salida Capital delivered more than $2.6 million to the Clinton Foundation. It just so happens that a company by the same name was listed by Rosatom in its annual report as being wholly owned by the Russian company.” Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p. 72

And….just before Hillary’s State Department committee, The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), approved the Uranium One deal, Bill was paid $500,000 by a Russian financial institution, Renaissance Capital, to deliver a short speech in Moscow. Ibid.

Nothing….not even America’s well being, can stand in the way of the Clinton’s enrichment.

1. Trump himself has close ties to Russia as he relied on Russian oligarchs to finance his projects because US banks would not lend him the money. Manafort was lobbying for Russian interests in Ukraine and handed over campaign documents and polling to a business associate with ties to Russian Intelligence. Podesta's e-mails were hacked as well. I suppose he hacked himself.

2. Rasmussen enough said.

3. Hillary Clinton did not have the power to approve the deal herself. It required 9 votes.

4. Both Hillary Clinton and John Podesta were victims of Russian hacks. Trump and Manafort made millions thanks to Russia and Russian interests.\

5. Paul Manafort was lobbying for Russian interests in Ukraine.

6. Media highlights Trump's ties to Russia.

Donald Trump's Many, Many, Many, Many Ties to Russia

7. The fact is that Claire McCaskill was the victim of a failed hack attempt. If she was in Russia's good graces then she would not have been the subject of a hack attack.

8. Manafdort was forced to do the same thing. He had to admit that he was lobbying for Russian interests in Ukraine.\

9. We know;

a. It took 9 votes to approve of the deal. Clinton was only 1 and apparently did not even attend the vote.

b. Same as above. Also Trump received millions for bringing his beauty pageant to Russia and millions from Russian oligarchs.

c. Manafort was forced to resign after reports of secret lobbying efforts on behalf of Russian interests in Ukraine surfaced.

d. Mueller investigated Manafort as well.

e. Manafort was convicted of lying about giving campaign data and polling to a business associate with ties to Russian intelligence. Papadopoulos was convicted of lying about his attempts to get dirt on Clinton from Russians. Roger Stone is under indictment for lying about the backchannel he claimed to have with WikiLeaks and how he knew Podesta's hacked e-mails appeared on the site BEFORE they were put up.

10. Republican Burr had no trouble with what Warner was doing. Maybe you should have posted this part of the Fox story.
"A Warner aide acknowledged that Warner and Burr revealed the texts to their colleagues on the panel because "they realized out of context it doesn't look great." But aides to Warner and Burr both stressed that the chairman was kept apprised of Warner's efforts.

An aide to Burr knew there was a "back channel" Warner was using to try and get to Steele and was not concerned that Warner was freelancing on the matter."

I can see how you or your source lifted elements of the story to make it look worse than it was.

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele

11. The fact is that the Trump campaign did attempt to get damaging information about Clinton from Russia. That is what the meeting with a Russian national was about. That is what Papadopoulos admitted to lying about. Schiff is irrelevant. He is the straw person the Republicans have chosen to demonize. It flopped with Pelosi in 2018 and it will flop again.

12. Same as no 10. You apparently are trying to make your list longer by repeating yourself.

13. That is a lie. The Russians wanted Trump not Clinton. Little wonder why. Clinton reaffirmed the US commitment to NATO while Trump questioned it. The Russians hacked the DNC servers and mixed fake information with real information. Our intelligence services confirm this. Even a faked document with a fake letterhead of a Democrat saying the fix was in was released. Clearly the Russians were playing a double game. If Trump was elected that would be good. If Clinton won, all of this would come out and cripple a Clinton Presidency.

14. Now you are relying on a compromised source. Maybe you should examine a book about Trump's ties to the Russian mob.

15. Clinton did not have the power to rubberstamp the deal. She was 1 of 9 votes requires to approve the deal. If they had not approved it then Obama would have made the decision.



It is Trump acolytes who put Trump above the well being of this country.

 

[Marion Morrison]

^Derp! We should call that guy the Spin Doctor!

 

[busybee01]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Just about every Democrat is running for president, which means they are constantly in campaign mode, which means nothing they say has to be accurate or honest.
Running for president allows them to lie with impunity.
Every single Democrat pledged in front of the sheister and race-hustling bigot AL Sharpton to support reparations. How many were serious?

This whole thing about a national emergency is a sop to Trump's base. Trump lies to please his base. Trump supporters have no room to talk.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What to do about lying media? They never got away with that before the 90s. What changed that can be rolled back and their feet held to the fire for publishing falsehoods?

PS: Politicians lying is expected. Sad but true.

Just about every Democrat is running for president, which means they are constantly in campaign mode, which means nothing they say has to be accurate or honest.
Running for president allows them to lie with impunity.
Every single Democrat pledged in front of the sheister and race-hustling bigot AL Sharpton to support reparations. How many were serious?

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

True, but now they don't have to feel guilty anymore.
Some of the stuff they say isn't just dishonest, but seditious.
Politicians in campaign mode can say stupid shit like, "WE Must FIGHT TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK......TRUMP IS A MURDERING RACIST. ......HE BETRAYED OUR COUNTRY.....
HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS!!!!!!

muddy....that's the mistake we all make in judging them by ourselves.

You don't really think they ever feel guilt???????


They lie, and lie, and lie......no matter how often experience, or we, tell them the truth and reveal the lies.

There are several posters I never respond to for that reason.

 

[busybee01]

The lack of impartial treatment of the Trump folks couldn't be more apparent........Clintonistas get immunity, the ability to destroy evidence, and special rights vis-a-vis lawyers present.


14. “…the Obama Department of Justice warped the Clinton email scandal investigation, from Bill Clinton’s secret meeting on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to unethical immunity given to the unveracious Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, to James Comey’s convoluted predetermined treatment of “likely winner” Clinton, and to DOJ’s Bruce Ohr’s flagrant conflict of interests in relation to Fusion GPS.” Autopsy of a Dead Coup




15. Obama lies, claiming never to have helped plan the coup......and when the lie is revealed.....no perp-march like Roger Stone.

"Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe
There are new texts allegedly showing that the Obama White House, the CIA, the FBI, and top Democrats colluded at the outset of the Russia probe.

...coordination between former President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan —which they say would “contradict” the Obama administration’s public stance about its hand in the process."
Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe

14. There was nothing convoluted about Comey's decision. Hillary Clinton did not try to sell or give secret information to a foreign power. The espionage act does not apply here. Alberto Gonzalez was accused by the IG of storing secret information. The DOJ declined to prosecute despite the technical violation.



15. More conspiracies. I suppose the dogcatcher was involved in this as well. Reid asked for a investigation and that makes him part of a conspircacy? I think not. You are the crazy one.

 

[busybee01]

16. Never equipped to lead America, Obama made certain that his DoJ ignored “the Clinton email scandal investigation, from Bill Clinton’s secret meeting on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to unethical immunity given to the unveracious Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, to James Comey’s convoluted predetermined treatment of “likely winner” Clinton, and to DOJ’s Bruce Ohr’s flagrant conflict of interests in relation to Fusion GPS.


The reputation of the FBI as venerable agency is all but wrecked. Its administrators variously have libeled the Trump voters, expressed hatred for Trump, talked of “insurance policies” in ending the Trump candidacy, and inserted informants into the Trump campaign.


… daily accused the sitting president of Russian collusion and treason—without cross-examination or notice that both previously had lied under oath to Congress … knee-deep in the dissemination of the Steele dossier among Obama administration officials.” Autopsy of a Dead Coup

17. You have done that Quit repeating yourself. Trump wants to lock up his political opponents and people who hold him accountable. That is a banana republic.

 

[busybee01]

17. “The FISA courts, fairly or not, are now mostly discredited, given they either were willingly or naively hoodwinked by FBI and DOJ officials who submitted as chief evidence for surveillance on American citizens, an unverified dossier—without disclosure that the bought campaign hit-piece was paid for by Hillary Clinton, authored by a discredited has-been British agent, relied on murky purchased Russian sources, and used in circular fashion to seed news accounts of supposed Trump misbehavior.” Autopsy of a Dead Coup




18. “…Strzok and his paramour, FBI attorney Lisa Page, exchanged messages about Strzok’s relationship with Judge Rudolph Contreras.
Page wrote in a text message to Strzok on July 25, 2016: “Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago.”

Carter said: “At that point, the pair continues to discuss other issues but comes back to Contreras, ‘I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.’ Then later Strzok appears to return to his discussion about Contreras.

Strzok then suggests that a “social setting” meeting would be better than “one-on-one.”
FISA judge now linked to demoted anti-Trump FBI agent - WND - WND




19. “When the Nunes memo was released, there was controversy over its assertion that the dossier formed an "essential" part of the Page FISA application. But Senate Judiciary Committee staff, who reviewed the FISA application separately from the House, concluded that the dossier allegations made up the "bulk" of the application.

Even a Washington Post articleSunday purporting to debunk the Nunes memo in light of the FISA application conceded that the dossier played "a prominent role" in the FISA application.” FISA warrant application supports Nunes memo

17. The FISA court is not discredited. Ordinary Americans do not find the FISA court discredited. Only Trump apologists do as they desperately try to save Trump in 2020.

18. No proof of anything. No evidence they ever talked. Rosenstein signed the FISA application and he does not know the judge.

19. The bulk is not all of it. Comey also said that parts of the dossier was confirmed and it was signed by Rosenstein who was appointed by Trump. The Senate Judiciary Committee is extremely partisan as Grassley and Graham filed phony criminal referrals in a attempt to smear and intimidate a witness.

 

[busybee01]

20. The Deep State…“…sanctimonious arrogant bureaucrats in suits and ties used their government agencies to seek to overturn the 2016 election, abort a presidency, and subvert the U.S. Constitution. And they did all that and more on the premise that they were our moral superiors and had uniquely divine rights to destroy a presidency that they loathed.



… predicated on three assumptions thematic during this three-year long government effort to destroy Trump:

One, during 2016, Hillary Clinton would certainly win the election and FBI and DOJ unethical and illegal behavior would be forgotten if not rewarded,

Two, … the fabricated dossier was so vile and salacious, that seeded rumors of Trump’s faked perversity gave them de facto exemptions to do whatever they damned pleased;

Three, Trump’s low polls, his controversial reset of American policy, and the general contempt in which he was held by the bipartisan coastal elite, celebrities, and the deep state, meant that even illegal means to continue the campaign-era effort to destroy Trump and now abort his presidency were felt to be moral and heroic acts without legal consequences, and the media would see the conspirators as heroes.” Autopsy of a Dead Coup

Condolences to all those fools who have been hanging on by their fingernails since November 9, 2016, praying to their savior, Mueller.

20. There is no deep state and no attempt to remove a President. It was a lawful investigation. Trump did accept the help of the Russians and Manafort gave campaign documents to a business associate with ties to Russian intelligence. Roger Stone knew about the Russian hacked Podesta e-mails BEFORE they were released on WikiLeaks.

 

[jc456]

20. The Deep State…“…sanctimonious arrogant bureaucrats in suits and ties used their government agencies to seek to overturn the 2016 election, abort a presidency, and subvert the U.S. Constitution. And they did all that and more on the premise that they were our moral superiors and had uniquely divine rights to destroy a presidency that they loathed.



… predicated on three assumptions thematic during this three-year long government effort to destroy Trump:

One, during 2016, Hillary Clinton would certainly win the election and FBI and DOJ unethical and illegal behavior would be forgotten if not rewarded,

Two, … the fabricated dossier was so vile and salacious, that seeded rumors of Trump’s faked perversity gave them de facto exemptions to do whatever they damned pleased;

Three, Trump’s low polls, his controversial reset of American policy, and the general contempt in which he was held by the bipartisan coastal elite, celebrities, and the deep state, meant that even illegal means to continue the campaign-era effort to destroy Trump and now abort his presidency were felt to be moral and heroic acts without legal consequences, and the media would see the conspirators as heroes.” Autopsy of a Dead Coup

Condolences to all those fools who have been hanging on by their fingernails since November 9, 2016, praying to their savior, Mueller.

20. There is no deep state and no attempt to remove a President. It was a lawful investigation. Trump did accept the help of the Russians and Manafort gave campaign documents to a business associate with ties to Russian intelligence. Roger Stone knew about the Russian hacked Podesta e-mails BEFORE they were released on WikiLeaks.

 

[busybee01]

It is a intriguing story. An intriguing story that will get very little exposure. I concur with your sentiment that this is actually more scandalous than even Watergate, but it is not an easy headline to write, the type of headline that will drawn in a reader.

Watergate- Illegal break in at night to bug the DNC headquarters and covered up by the PResident of the United States of America.

Go ahead- try to write the headline for this scandal and you’ll see what I mean.

"Members of obama Department of Justice attempt Coup, try to remove rival President."

"Crazy Birds of a Feather Flock Together"

 

[jc456]

It is a intriguing story. An intriguing story that will get very little exposure. I concur with your sentiment that this is actually more scandalous than even Watergate, but it is not an easy headline to write, the type of headline that will drawn in a reader.

Watergate- Illegal break in at night to bug the DNC headquarters and covered up by the PResident of the United States of America.

Go ahead- try to write the headline for this scandal and you’ll see what I mean.

"Members of obama Department of Justice attempt Coup, try to remove rival President."

"Crazy Birds of a Feather Flock Together"

enjoy your crazy

 

[busybee01]

Further, Seth Rich being the hacker and not "the russians" put the plotters in a fix....Rich had to go. His whereabouts were unknown for hours between the time he left the bar and was found shot to death. He was probably hiding and trying to lose the two black men following him during that time. So you ask yourself who would benefit from Rich being unable to testify and there's only one name that makes sense....Clinton. They usually use black men to do their dirty work because they're "progressive" and believe in "diversity". Look into the list of disappearances and "suicides" involving the Clintons...Willy knows people in the "black community" (gang bangers) and they do him favors. And then there's the Rich family who clammed up and refused to discuss their son's murder...they likely were given a nice piece of cash and told they'd be next if they didn't shut up...why else would they threaten to sue Hannity if he continued looking into their son's death? With Rich out of the way and Julian Assange marooned in an embassy over a fake rape charge, they had an open field to go after Trump and Hillary would have her revenge....oops....didn't work out that way.

That has been discredited. The DNC e-mails and later the Podesta e-mails were leaked by Russia. You are a crazy Looney Tune. The Rich family did not shut up. They loudly protested these politically inspired attacks on their son. Julian Assange has ties to Russia including financial.

 

[busybee01]

It is a intriguing story. An intriguing story that will get very little exposure. I concur with your sentiment that this is actually more scandalous than even Watergate, but it is not an easy headline to write, the type of headline that will drawn in a reader.

Watergate- Illegal break in at night to bug the DNC headquarters and covered up by the PResident of the United States of America.

Go ahead- try to write the headline for this scandal and you’ll see what I mean.

"Members of obama Department of Justice attempt Coup, try to remove rival President."

"Crazy Birds of a Feather Flock Together"

enjoy your crazy

You are doing well enough for both of us.

 

[busybee01]

Again, if it comes down to believing intel officers or some yahoo on the Internet....who would you believe

Murder isn't a federal crime so the FBI doesn't do murder and the CIA doesn't do anything domestic so what "intel agencies" are you talking about, moron?

Investigating the hacking of computers which was done by Russian intelligence. At the behest of Trump’s campaign it seems

Is there a hamster running on a wheel in your head? Clinton's unsecure devices got hacked before Donald even won the nomination.

There is no evidence of that. If the Russians had hacked them, it is a safe bet they would have released them as Trump wanted them to.

Get rid of that cuckoo clock you use for a brain.

 

[jc456]

QUOTE="busybee01, post: 22174101, member: 61635"]

Again, if it comes down to believing intel officers or some yahoo on the Internet....who would you believe

Murder isn't a federal crime so the FBI doesn't do murder and the CIA doesn't do anything domestic so what "intel agencies" are you talking about, moron?

Investigating the hacking of computers which was done by Russian intelligence. At the behest of Trump’s campaign it seems

Is there a hamster running on a wheel in your head? Clinton's unsecure devices got hacked before Donald even won the nomination.

There is no evidence of that. If the Russians had hacked them, it is a safe bet they would have released them as Trump wanted them to.

Get rid of that cuckoo clock you use for a brain.[/QUOTE]

dude, you just doubled down on your investment of stupid. seriously. The FBI had clinton's server before the election cycle. There is evidence of that.

 

[busybee01]

What about meeting in an office and lying about it?

If lying is something you find unacceptable, how could you have voted for her?

out of all the candidates in the race, she was the most honest.... bernie told more lies/falsities than her and Trump lied 100 times more... according to all Fact Checkers???

Oh my!

And here I was thinking you weren’t completely on the left.

You really need to rethink that.

No that's true too. Less than Bernie even.

Bernie is very likely POTUS today if not for the underhanded collusion by Hillary, DNCMSM, and the DNC. Yet you still admire these crooks.

Sanders was never going to be President. Clinton got 54% of the primary vote to 42%. That is a majority since that seems to be above your education level.

 

[gipper]

If lying is something you find unacceptable, how could you have voted for her?

out of all the candidates in the race, she was the most honest.... bernie told more lies/falsities than her and Trump lied 100 times more... according to all Fact Checkers???

Oh my!

And here I was thinking you weren’t completely on the left.

You really need to rethink that.

No that's true too. Less than Bernie even.

Bernie is very likely POTUS today if not for the underhanded collusion by Hillary, DNCMSM, and the DNC. Yet you still admire these crooks.

Sanders was never going to be President. Clinton got 54% of the primary vote to 42%. That is a majority since that seems to be above your education level.

When the MSM, DNC, and the Executive Branch are all colluding to get you the nomination, it’s easy to see how she won. It takes intelligence to understand this is not fair.