Bernie Sanders slams Charles Schultz

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
52,549
50,745
3,605
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.
 
I liked the guy
Charles_Schulz_NYWTS.jpg
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.

He didn't say Rich is bad. He said the only reason he is getting attention is because he is rich. There's a big difference there.
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.
Howard Schultz did you not read the article?
 
Yeah, who does Charles Schultz think he is having poor ole Charlies Brown falling for this trick day after day!

Charlie-Brown-kick.jpg
 
Sanders may run as a 3rd party candidate after the DNC screws him again with those super delegates. That would be hilarious.
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.

He didn't say Rich is bad. He said the only reason he is getting attention is because he is rich. There's a big difference there.

No, he is trashing him for being rich.

This is what socialists do.
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.

He didn't say Rich is bad. He said the only reason he is getting attention is because he is rich. There's a big difference there.

No, he is trashing him for being rich.

This is what socialists do.

Thanks for confirming you didn't read your own link.
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.

He didn't say Rich is bad. He said the only reason he is getting attention is because he is rich. There's a big difference there.

No, he is trashing him for being rich.

This is what socialists do.

Thanks for confirming you didn't read your own link.
OP should have been a little more snoopy, and actually read the article.
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.
Someone's parents had a sense of humor.
Ooopppsss....Someone didn't read their link. lol
 
Sanders rips Schultz's possible 2020 bid: Any billionaire can throw TV ads around and be credible

Apparently Bernie Sanders has a very low opinion of Charles Schultz in his bid for being President. His retort? Essentially he is a rich man, thus he is "bad".

That's it. No more critique on Charles Schultz other than that. No mention of his character, his policies, nothing. We simply judge people based upon their wallet, and presumably skin color now in the Socialist party of America, formerly known as the DNC.

He didn't say Rich is bad. He said the only reason he is getting attention is because he is rich. There's a big difference there.

No, he is trashing him for being rich.

This is what socialists do.

Thanks for confirming you didn't read your own link.
OP should have been a little more snoopy, and actually read the article.

If Charles were still alive, would he have been considered too rich to run for President?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top