Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, I'm saying the lying scum source you mindlessly parroted without checking dishonestly used numbers that used two different baselines. It is not that hard to figure out!Oh? So you're saying they falsified the numbers to make them say what they wanted them to. Is that what you're saying?Typical denier dishonesty!!!Yeah....pretty much. NOAA reported that 1998 global temp was 62 degrees. This last year it was 58. Which number is bigger?So you're saying the entirety of climate science with thousands of temperature measurements from all over the world is a fraud. lol
The 62 degree number is calculated against the 30 year average baseline from 1961 to 1990, whereas the 58 degree number was calculated using the 20th century average baseline. Only the most dishonest scum would compare two different baselines!!!!
Global Analysis - Annual 2015 | State of the Climate | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
With the contribution of such record warmth at year's end and with 10 months of the year record warm for their respective months, including the last 8 (January was second warmest for January and April was third warmest), the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both well below the 2015 temperature departure.
Mr. Westwall will not post the source of his nonsense. He has a long record here of lying, even to the extent of posting an article, and lying about what the article said.No, I'm saying the lying scum source you mindlessly parroted without checking dishonestly used numbers that used two different baselines. It is not that hard to figure out!Oh? So you're saying they falsified the numbers to make them say what they wanted them to. Is that what you're saying?Typical denier dishonesty!!!Yeah....pretty much. NOAA reported that 1998 global temp was 62 degrees. This last year it was 58. Which number is bigger?So you're saying the entirety of climate science with thousands of temperature measurements from all over the world is a fraud. lol
The 62 degree number is calculated against the 30 year average baseline from 1961 to 1990, whereas the 58 degree number was calculated using the 20th century average baseline. Only the most dishonest scum would compare two different baselines!!!!
Global Analysis - Annual 2015 | State of the Climate | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
With the contribution of such record warmth at year's end and with 10 months of the year record warm for their respective months, including the last 8 (January was second warmest for January and April was third warmest), the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both well below the 2015 temperature departure.
Why don't you name the source of your dishonest numbers you used so all honest people can know never to trust them, even though you will continue to trust them forever.
No, I'm saying the lying scum source you mindlessly parroted without checking dishonestly used numbers that used two different baselines. It is not that hard to figure out!Oh? So you're saying they falsified the numbers to make them say what they wanted them to. Is that what you're saying?Typical denier dishonesty!!!Yeah....pretty much. NOAA reported that 1998 global temp was 62 degrees. This last year it was 58. Which number is bigger?So you're saying the entirety of climate science with thousands of temperature measurements from all over the world is a fraud. lol
The 62 degree number is calculated against the 30 year average baseline from 1961 to 1990, whereas the 58 degree number was calculated using the 20th century average baseline. Only the most dishonest scum would compare two different baselines!!!!
Global Analysis - Annual 2015 | State of the Climate | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
With the contribution of such record warmth at year's end and with 10 months of the year record warm for their respective months, including the last 8 (January was second warmest for January and April was third warmest), the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both well below the 2015 temperature departure.
Why don't you name the source of your dishonest numbers you used so all honest people can know never to trust them, even though you will continue to trust them forever.
Mr. Westwall will not post the source of his nonsense. He has a long record here of lying, even to the extent of posting an article, and lying about what the article said.No, I'm saying the lying scum source you mindlessly parroted without checking dishonestly used numbers that used two different baselines. It is not that hard to figure out!Oh? So you're saying they falsified the numbers to make them say what they wanted them to. Is that what you're saying?Typical denier dishonesty!!!Yeah....pretty much. NOAA reported that 1998 global temp was 62 degrees. This last year it was 58. Which number is bigger?So you're saying the entirety of climate science with thousands of temperature measurements from all over the world is a fraud. lol
The 62 degree number is calculated against the 30 year average baseline from 1961 to 1990, whereas the 58 degree number was calculated using the 20th century average baseline. Only the most dishonest scum would compare two different baselines!!!!
Global Analysis - Annual 2015 | State of the Climate | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
With the contribution of such record warmth at year's end and with 10 months of the year record warm for their respective months, including the last 8 (January was second warmest for January and April was third warmest), the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both well below the 2015 temperature departure.
Why don't you name the source of your dishonest numbers you used so all honest people can know never to trust them, even though you will continue to trust them forever.
So you are rightly ashamed to cite your source. No surprise there!Yes, your hero's have a long, well documented history of falsifying data. The evidence has been posted here many, many, many times. The fact that you have chosen to ignore those links is on you. Not me.No, I'm saying the lying scum source you mindlessly parroted without checking dishonestly used numbers that used two different baselines. It is not that hard to figure out!Oh? So you're saying they falsified the numbers to make them say what they wanted them to. Is that what you're saying?Typical denier dishonesty!!!Yeah....pretty much. NOAA reported that 1998 global temp was 62 degrees. This last year it was 58. Which number is bigger?So you're saying the entirety of climate science with thousands of temperature measurements from all over the world is a fraud. lol
The 62 degree number is calculated against the 30 year average baseline from 1961 to 1990, whereas the 58 degree number was calculated using the 20th century average baseline. Only the most dishonest scum would compare two different baselines!!!!
Global Analysis - Annual 2015 | State of the Climate | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
With the contribution of such record warmth at year's end and with 10 months of the year record warm for their respective months, including the last 8 (January was second warmest for January and April was third warmest), the average global temperature across land and ocean surface areas for 2015 was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F)
The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both well below the 2015 temperature departure.
Why don't you name the source of your dishonest numbers you used so all honest people can know never to trust them, even though you will continue to trust them forever.
BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
How long is "the record? And how consistently has it been guesstimated with the same methodology and instruments within that period?August Ties July as Hottest Month Ever on Record
August Ties July as Hottest Month Ever on Record
Share Share
- Published: September 12th, 2016
By Andrea Thompson
In what has become a common refrain this year, last month ranked as the hottest August on record, according to NASA data released Monday. Not only that, but the month tied July as the hottest month the world has seen in the last 136 years.
August came in at 1.76˚F (0.98˚C) above the average from 1951-1980, 0.16C above August 2014, the previous record holder. The record keeps 2016 on track to be the hottest year in the books by a fair margin.
How temperatures in 2016 have charted against previous years, including the tied record hot months of July and August.
That August continued the streak of record hot months this year and tied July as the hottest month was somewhat unexpected. The seasonal temperature cycle generally reaches a peak in July, as it did this year. But August was so anomalously warm — more so even than July — that it tied that month’s overall temperature.
It was also thought that July would likely be the last record hot month of the year, given the dissipation of El Niño.In NASA’s dataset, August marks the 11th record-setting month in a row. That streak goes back 15 months through July in data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Each agency handles the global temperature data slightly differently and uses a different period of comparison, leading to slight differences in the monthly and yearly temperature numbers. Overall, though, both datasets show clear agreement in the overall warming trend.
That trend is what Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and other climate scientists emphasize. It is that excess heat that has accumulated over decades thanks to rising levels of greenhouse gases that accounts for the bulk of this year’s record warmth, with El Niño providing only a small boost.
Wow, there's almost no way 2016 won't be the hottest year on record!
How long is "the record? And how consistently has it been guesstimated with the same methodology and instruments within that period?
Also, even if you assume that there has been a significant temperature change, do you have any proof that it is a negative change rather than a positive change to our environment?
Any proof of Catastrophic AGW whatsoever? Do you have one fucking shred of proof Mr. Chicken Little? Of course you don't.
The fact of the matter is that you are nothing but a feeble-minded mental lightweight who has been brainwashed via repeated messaging, the oldest method in the book to influence idiots such as yourself.
BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
Now let us include Alaska on that chart and see what it looks like. Also, include links to where you get the information, so we can check and see what it includes and excludes. Not that you ever will.BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
BULLSHIT!!!!BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
Now let us include Alaska on that chart and see what it looks like. Also, include links to where you get the information, so we can check and see what it includes and excludes. Not that you ever will.BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
BULLSHIT!!!!BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
That chart is NOT from USCRN, it is from the anti-environment denier site Earth Rising.
Here is the real McCoy:
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
No you won't or you would have used a link to the actual USCRN data, like I did, and not the denier Earth Rising site. Not only that, there is a year's worth of data missing from your chart.BULLSHIT!!!!BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
That chart is NOT from USCRN, it is from the anti-environment denier site Earth Rising.
Here is the real McCoy:
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Yep...now plot each month from 2005 to 2016...combine them and you get the graph above....showing a cooling trend in the continental US over the past 11 years.
No you won't or you would have used a link to the actual USCRN data, like I did, and not the denier Earth Rising site. Not only that, there is a year's worth of data missing from your chart.BULLSHIT!!!!BULLSHIT!And while you are at it...take a look at the continental US....and let me remind you that the CRN network...that is the network that is state of the art...triple redundant...and so pristinely placed that it requires no adjustment says that the continental US is cooling..and has been for at least the past decade...
The red line on the chart is CRN data.
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Bullshit...here is the USCRN data...
One look shows why it doesn't get much press.
That chart is NOT from USCRN, it is from the anti-environment denier site Earth Rising.
Here is the real McCoy:
National Temperature Index | Temperature, Precipitation, and Drought | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
Yep...now plot each month from 2005 to 2016...combine them and you get the graph above....showing a cooling trend in the continental US over the past 11 years.
BULLSHIT!guess you didn't notice that your link only provides 1 month at a time....try averaging the total of all 12 months across the 10 year period...again..you get the results indicated in my chart...sorry this is so hard for you...and sorry that it pisses on your belief...but alas...to bad.
I love heat......
Bring it on.
