Ask a democrat

[Sun Devil 92]

When I'm drinking, and I am, I'm even more on point, rube.

I'd be drinking too if I lost like you cocksuckers did in November.

Talk about giving it away.

But you certainly are nothing more than a bigger prick than when you are sober.

asswipe

Lost? You deal in elections - I deal in decades. Trump is breaking what needed to be fixed and aftre he's done, single-payer, the U.S. treated as just another nation, and Russia tossed out, we'll have no choice. Lose the battle, win the war, and we always win the war. It's why women have rights and fags get married. Suck it, Snowflake.

Yep. We've owned the house for seven six years and will likely own it for a decade. That after your piss-for-brains nomineed screwed up our health care system with his fucked up law.

BTW: You lost this battle and you'll lose the war. Trump will nominate at least one if not two SCOTUS judges and by the time it's over, Kagen and Sotomeyer will be keeping each other company in the eternal losers corner.

And you can join them.

Who is "you". Conservatives gave women the right to vote long before you asswipes ever thought of it.

Suck on that loser.

Trump will never nominate another SC justice. One, he won't last that long, two, the Democrats will never allow the position to be filled by a GOPer.

He could possibly nominate two more, your progressive idle Harry Reid enacted the nuclear option… Karma is a bitch

The GOP is already gearing up.

Notice how, in Montana, you can kick at pussy of a reporter's ass and still get elected.

 

[RightyTighty]

When I'm drinking, and I am, I'm even more on point, rube.

I'd be drinking too if I lost like you cocksuckers did in November.

Talk about giving it away.

But you certainly are nothing more than a bigger prick than when you are sober.

asswipe

Lost? You deal in elections - I deal in decades. Trump is breaking what needed to be fixed and aftre he's done, single-payer, the U.S. treated as just another nation, and Russia tossed out, we'll have no choice. Lose the battle, win the war, and we always win the war. It's why women have rights and fags get married. Suck it, Snowflake.

Yep. We've owned the house for seven six years and will likely own it for a decade. That after your piss-for-brains nomineed screwed up our health care system with his fucked up law.

BTW: You lost this battle and you'll lose the war. Trump will nominate at least one if not two SCOTUS judges and by the time it's over, Kagen and Sotomeyer will be keeping each other company in the eternal losers corner.

And you can join them.

Who is "you". Conservatives gave women the right to vote long before you asswipes ever thought of it.

Suck on that loser.

Trump will never nominate another SC justice. One, he won't last that long, two, the Democrats will never allow the position to be filled by a GOPer.

He could possibly nominate two more, your progressive idle Harry Reid enacted the nuclear option… Karma is a bitch

He's not going to get even one, let alone two. Sorry, it ain't gonna happen.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

At one point they were saying that something like 2,500 of every 10,000 you spent on a new GM was going to retirees.

What crazy stupid business model.

In the Good Old Days, when they could do no wrong and cash was easy, they cut some bad deals. That's capitalism, boys.

Uh, no it isn't. It's stupid.

Greece and other European nations have cut the same bad deals and paid for it.

They are not capitalists.

Socialism isn't capitalism. Learn to deal with the differences.

You really are drunk.

GM's crappy choices were not related to capitalism.

They were related to stupid people at the top. That isn't unique to capitalism.

You need an understanding of the various economic systems. GM got fat, dumb, and happy, like most of post-WWII American. That was a serious mistake.

No shit sherlock.

And this country stupidly sighned up for a social security system it won't be able to afford (at current levels) pretty soon.

Not unique to capitalism.

I know the difference....fuck off.

 

[RightyTighty]

I'd be drinking too if I lost like you cocksuckers did in November.

Talk about giving it away.

But you certainly are nothing more than a bigger prick than when you are sober.

asswipe

Lost? You deal in elections - I deal in decades. Trump is breaking what needed to be fixed and aftre he's done, single-payer, the U.S. treated as just another nation, and Russia tossed out, we'll have no choice. Lose the battle, win the war, and we always win the war. It's why women have rights and fags get married. Suck it, Snowflake.

Yep. We've owned the house for seven six years and will likely own it for a decade. That after your piss-for-brains nomineed screwed up our health care system with his fucked up law.

BTW: You lost this battle and you'll lose the war. Trump will nominate at least one if not two SCOTUS judges and by the time it's over, Kagen and Sotomeyer will be keeping each other company in the eternal losers corner.

And you can join them.

Who is "you". Conservatives gave women the right to vote long before you asswipes ever thought of it.

Suck on that loser.

Trump will never nominate another SC justice. One, he won't last that long, two, the Democrats will never allow the position to be filled by a GOPer.

He could possibly nominate two more, your progressive idle Harry Reid enacted the nuclear option… Karma is a bitch

The GOP is already gearing up.

Notice how, in Montana, you can kick at pussy of a reporter's ass and still get elected.

Trump got 56% and the GOP guy barely broke 50% while some unknown Democratic folk singer got 43%? That's deep shit my friend.

 

[ScienceRocks]

BS. Go read a history book in which it was well-know what was killing them off and starving early Americans stole from them and dug up and ate their corpses.

Obviously you don't know the history...

No, I know the real history, when white men served Indians, when women ran off to be with Indian men because they didn't beat and rape them like white men, when tri-racial societies scared the fuck out of old white men because they were humane and democratic. The real history would fuck you up good, staring with starving whites digging up the bodies of dead diseased Indians and eating them to survive. They wrote it all down, we have their letters to prove it.

You believe Hollywood too much…

That's not Hollywood you dumb drunken Sioux. That's real American history that's only taught in college (and almost never there because it makes us look like the assholes we really were). If you search for it you will see that I am right but you'll never hear about it. Cannibalism? Stealing from the Indians? Fucking Indians? Serving Indians? Oh my God, that ruins the whole fucking myth of the white man taming this nation. When he got here, he couldn't grow his own damn food and starved to death, until that is the Indians took pity and died off 98 of 100 for their concern from diseases they'd never been exposed to. That is the real history.

That sounds like a story Al gore would come up with… Manbearpig doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground... anyway, he's too busy getting rich off carbon credits to give a shit about you little progressive minions.

Well, if you believe that climate change is a serious cause for concern.. It is about measuring long term harm on our society! Is it worth it if it is true?

 

[Coyote]

BREAKING: Massive thread explosion in the wee hours the night. Thread derailed causing an unkown number of casualties and necessitating hazmat thread clean up. 42 posts among the casualties before we stopped counting.

Infractions and threadbans have been handed out. 42 posts were deleted before I got tired of back tracking.

Anyone who wants to continue the food fight had better take it down to the Flame Zone.

 

[Timmy]

Is a person's sexuality the result of a genetic predisposition or is it simply a "choice?"

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

 

[bripat9643]

Is a person's sexuality the result of a genetic predisposition or is it simply a "choice?"

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

Who put you in charge of making the rules? Absent force or fraud, no rules are required. If you don't like the way a business is run, then don't patronize it.

 

[Timmy]

Is a person's sexuality the result of a genetic predisposition or is it simply a "choice?"

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

Who put you in charge of making the rules? Absent force or fraud, no rules are required. If you don't like the way a business is run, then don't patronize it.

I am not in charge . The rules come from laws created by the people we elect into office .

Usually after some outrage over bad behavior from some business .

There is no constitutional right to have a business that can do whatever the fuck it wants .

 

[ScienceRocks]

Is a person's sexuality the result of a genetic predisposition or is it simply a "choice?"

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

Who put you in charge of making the rules? Absent force or fraud, no rules are required. If you don't like the way a business is run, then don't patronize it.

I am not in charge . The rules come from laws created by the people we elect into office .

Usually after some outrage over bad behavior from some business .

There is no constitutional right to have a business that can do whatever the fuck it wants .

If Bripat had his way the owner would be able to tie his workers up in rope or chain and make them slaves. He'd have the right to feed them dog shit at lunch...

This guys nuts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why do you want to flood this country with cheap Mexican labor?

I don't...

The republicans and the rich certainly have for the past 50 years....The republicans have a long history supporting outsourcing(Nixons China policy, Reagans and george hw Bushs Nafta) and cheap labor for the past 50 years.

Certainly we democrats want amnesty for the illegals but the left doesn't really like outsourcing, offshoring and cheating the system as the republican rich.

Nafta wouldn't have passed without bill clinton, matthew. He weedled, cajoled, and probably blackmailed demorat congress critters to pass it. obama was trying to sneak tpp trade deal in also. Demorats no more care for the working stiffs anymore than the republicans do. If they did, they wouldn't be for open borders and cheap labor.

Name the Democrats that want Open Borders or call for more cheap labor? We'll wait.

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
and
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of “Open Borders”
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of "Open Borders" | HuffPost
and
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders

A nation founded by immigrants supporting continued immigration - how terrible.

1. “In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



2. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.




3. BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......

 

[Timmy]

I don't...

The republicans and the rich certainly have for the past 50 years....The republicans have a long history supporting outsourcing(Nixons China policy, Reagans and george hw Bushs Nafta) and cheap labor for the past 50 years.

Certainly we democrats want amnesty for the illegals but the left doesn't really like outsourcing, offshoring and cheating the system as the republican rich.

Nafta wouldn't have passed without bill clinton, matthew. He weedled, cajoled, and probably blackmailed demorat congress critters to pass it. obama was trying to sneak tpp trade deal in also. Demorats no more care for the working stiffs anymore than the republicans do. If they did, they wouldn't be for open borders and cheap labor.

Name the Democrats that want Open Borders or call for more cheap labor? We'll wait.

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
and
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of “Open Borders”
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of "Open Borders" | HuffPost
and
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders

A nation founded by immigrants supporting continued immigration - how terrible.

1. “In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



2. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.




3. BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......

Illegals do not qualify for welfare .

Illegals do not and can not vote .

From your own link : foreign born represent 10% of the prison pop.

Right wing fake news fantasy .

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nafta wouldn't have passed without bill clinton, matthew. He weedled, cajoled, and probably blackmailed demorat congress critters to pass it. obama was trying to sneak tpp trade deal in also. Demorats no more care for the working stiffs anymore than the republicans do. If they did, they wouldn't be for open borders and cheap labor.

Name the Democrats that want Open Borders or call for more cheap labor? We'll wait.

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
and
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of “Open Borders”
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of "Open Borders" | HuffPost
and
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders

A nation founded by immigrants supporting continued immigration - how terrible.

1. “In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



2. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.




3. BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......

Illegals do not qualify for welfare .

Illegals do not and can not vote .

Right wing fake news fantasy .

I know you're stupid, but...really.....it isn't necessary for you to prove it each and every day.


1. "Illegals do not qualify for welfare."
You're a moron.

"In this world-turned-upside-down context, let's look at the eligibility rules for Food Stamps, rules that in 46 of the 50 states mean that the U.S. government rewards a household for having an illegal immigrant within it.

As humorist Dave Barry says, I am not making this up.

Such households have a mix of illegals (often parents) and citizens (usually kids); only the citizens are nominally eligible for the benefits of the program, but if groceries purchased by Food Stamps are on the dining room table, the common-sense assumption is that all members of the family will benefit from it.

Yes, all else being equal, a low-income household with one or more illegal aliens in it, is more likely to get Food Stamps than a household with similar income with all members being legally present. In another, related scenario both families are eligible, both have equal incomes, but the one with an illegal alien member seems to get a larger allotment."
The Food Stamp Program Rewards Households with Illegal Aliens

 

[ScienceRocks]

I don't want the illegals getting welfare or the vote(at least until we amnesty them )

The right wing always makes shit up to justify being fascist. What's funny is they suppose to hate government but the reality is they only hate government that cares about the bottom 90%.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nafta wouldn't have passed without bill clinton, matthew. He weedled, cajoled, and probably blackmailed demorat congress critters to pass it. obama was trying to sneak tpp trade deal in also. Demorats no more care for the working stiffs anymore than the republicans do. If they did, they wouldn't be for open borders and cheap labor.

Name the Democrats that want Open Borders or call for more cheap labor? We'll wait.

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world
and
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of “Open Borders”
Bernie and Immigration: Reclaiming the Concept of "Open Borders" | HuffPost
and
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders

A nation founded by immigrants supporting continued immigration - how terrible.

1. “In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



2. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.




3. BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......

Illegals do not qualify for welfare .

Illegals do not and can not vote .

From your own link : foreign born represent 10% of the prison pop.

Right wing fake news fantasy .

2. "Illegals do not and can not vote."
You're a moron.

How's this....LA Times:

a. "If you’ve visited the DMV in the last few weeks, you may have noticed that you can now complete your voter registration at the same time you renew your driver’s license — without having to fill out a separate form.... they will be registered as having no party preference. " Registered to vote at the DMV? Check again. Many who use the new process miss a vital step two


Wanna deny this:

b. "12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally" 12 States (and DC) That Allow Driver's Licenses for People in the Country Illegally - Illegal Immigration - ProCon.org


How about disqualifying this guy...




c. "Clinton has beaten Trump in the popular vote by approximately 2.5 million."

Yup....but not if you only count legal voters.

"Richman was the co-author of a 2014 study that looked at noncitizen voting in the 2008 and 2010 elections. In the comparable presidential election year, the Old Dominion study determined 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted in the 2008 presidential election, and about 81 percent of those voters backed Democrat Barack Obama."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf



Now....if 6.4 percent on noncitizens in the United States voted last time

....and now
a. their icon, Obama, told them to vote and not be concerned that there would be any penalty (as per the video)

and...

b. the central issue in Trump's campaign was throwing them out of the nation that they invaded....


....ya' think maybe 13.2%....or 17.6%.....or more of 'em voted??????


You betcha'!!!!!!!

 

[bripat9643]

Is a person's sexuality the result of a genetic predisposition or is it simply a "choice?"

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

Who put you in charge of making the rules? Absent force or fraud, no rules are required. If you don't like the way a business is run, then don't patronize it.

I am not in charge . The rules come from laws created by the people we elect into office .

Usually after some outrage over bad behavior from some business .

There is no constitutional right to have a business that can do whatever the fuck it wants .

Sure there is. So long as it doesn't engage in force or fraud, you have a right to start any business you like. The Constitution does not give the federal government the authority to stop you.

As for the rules, you assume the mob Is entitled to impose arbitrary rules on me. It isn't. See, a free country is where the mob has to refrain from telling you what to do, but you don't believe in freedom. You believe in the herd.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't want the illegals getting welfare or the vote(at least until we amnesty them )

The right wing always makes shit up to justify being fascist. What's funny is they suppose to hate government but the reality is they only hate government that cares about the bottom 90%.

In other words, you want them to get the vote.

Who do you think your fooling with this utterly transparent shit?

 

[bripat9643]

Why can't it be both ? In the end . Who cares. Being able to marry a guy OR girl is freedom!

But not running your own business as you see fit and serving who you like instead of who you are told to serve.

Yep. Because business has to follow certain rules. Like having handicapped access or health codes . Don't like it, don't go into business .

Who put you in charge of making the rules? Absent force or fraud, no rules are required. If you don't like the way a business is run, then don't patronize it.

I am not in charge . The rules come from laws created by the people we elect into office .

Usually after some outrage over bad behavior from some business .

There is no constitutional right to have a business that can do whatever the fuck it wants .

If Bripat had his way the owner would be able to tie his workers up in rope or chain and make them slaves. He'd have the right to feed them dog shit at lunch...

This guys nuts.

What part of "absent of force or fraud" didn't you understand, shit stain?

 

[ScienceRocks]

 

[Rustic]

You could've posted a quote by someone who has some credibility, Mr. Lawrence has zero credibility. But then again he's a control freak like the rest of you progressives...