Anybody wondering why Candy had the Rose Garden Transcript....

[Amazed]

As long as you realize your butthurt doesn't constitute my failure.

Cheddar thinks he is a world class intellectual

Great Gaea's galloping gazongas, why?!

I have no idea.

 

[daveman]

Cheddar thinks he is a world class intellectual

Great Gaea's galloping gazongas, why?!

I have no idea.

He's just bitterly clinging to the idea for no apparent reason, I suppose.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm going to guess that she did her homework and prepared in advance of the debate. The campaigns were both notified that she planned to ask follow-up questions of the candidates during the debate. It would have been stupid for her to have failed to review for the Libya question.

Wasn't it even more stupid for her to insist that Obama didn't say it wasn't terrorism? One casual word referring word does not negate two weeks of denials, some of them from his own mouth.

Why do you deny what is undeniable? What is the point of that? The president's reference to acts of terror in the context of referencing the act of the killings is plain English.

 

[Cheddarmelon]

Great Gaea's galloping gazongas, why?!

I have no idea.

He's just bitterly clinging to the idea for no apparent reason, I suppose.

You're pathetic. Having a backslapping conversation with a fellow mouthbreather?

I'm sorry for interrupting. Please let me step out and allow you to resume your mutual masturbation.

 

[daveman]

I have no idea.

He's just bitterly clinging to the idea for no apparent reason, I suppose.

You're pathetic. Having a backslapping conversation with a fellow mouthbreather?

I'm sorry for interrupting. Please let me step out and allow you to resume your mutual masturbation.

You can't think of a reason why you consider yourself intelligent, either, huh?

One of life's great mysteries. No one seems to know. Including you.

Weird.

 

[Amazed]

I have no idea.

He's just bitterly clinging to the idea for no apparent reason, I suppose.

You're pathetic. Having a backslapping conversation with a fellow mouthbreather?

I'm sorry for interrupting. Please let me step out and allow you to resume your mutual masturbation.

So much for assumed voice of reason, just another widget who has ego wrapped up into his online persona.

You are dismissed kiddo.

 

[J.E.D]

Our guys winning, we have no reason to come unglued Jose.

The name is Josef, not Jose, you illiterate sack of shit.

And apparently, you are coming apart at the seams. And, no, your guy isn't winning. In case you haven't noticed, Obama still has a slight lead in some key swing states, and nationally, the race is at a statistical tie.

Try again, Dazed.

Sorry Jose, our is up by .6...you are losing....and judging by your response YOU are coming unglued.

.6? Well within the margin of error; thus, a statistical tie. As I said.

 

[Cheddarmelon]

He's just bitterly clinging to the idea for no apparent reason, I suppose.

You're pathetic. Having a backslapping conversation with a fellow mouthbreather?

I'm sorry for interrupting. Please let me step out and allow you to resume your mutual masturbation.

So much for assumed voice of reason, just another widget who has ego wrapped up into his online persona.

You are dismissed kiddo.

Yes Massa!

 

[Amazed]

You're pathetic. Having a backslapping conversation with a fellow mouthbreather?

I'm sorry for interrupting. Please let me step out and allow you to resume your mutual masturbation.

So much for assumed voice of reason, just another widget who has ego wrapped up into his online persona.

You are dismissed kiddo.

Yes Massa!

There ya go, he is an angry black man.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD4a9GHBF_U&feature=related]Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPzjayOh-PU&feature=relmfu]Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube[/ame]



O'shit did Obama fuck up on security?

Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIxjz5wEcF0]September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube[/ame]

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'

On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.

 

[Amazed]

The name is Josef, not Jose, you illiterate sack of shit.

And apparently, you are coming apart at the seams. And, no, your guy isn't winning. In case you haven't noticed, Obama still has a slight lead in some key swing states, and nationally, the race is at a statistical tie.

Try again, Dazed.

Sorry Jose, our is up by .6...you are losing....and judging by your response YOU are coming unglued.

.6? Well within the margin of error; thus, a statistical tie. As I said.

Look I know how invested you are in your Boy King.....you've got to be so proud of him.

 

[J.E.D]

Sorry Jose, our is up by .6...you are losing....and judging by your response YOU are coming unglued.

.6? Well within the margin of error; thus, a statistical tie. As I said.

Look I know how invested you are in your Boy King.....you've got to be so proud of him.

So, you DON'T know what a statistical tie is. Why didn't you just say so?

 

[catzmeow]

Romney's the one who tried to sneak a lie through.

Isn't it more important that the truth came out during the debate?

Obama blamed the murders on a movie for two weeks.. .knowing full well it was an organized terrorist attack that fully contracdicted his ridiculous assertions that Al Quadea is dead.

FACT.

The first source to blame the video was the New York Times, which published a story on 9/12/2012 linking the attack to a local militia group and stating that MEMBERS OF THE GROUP MENTIONED THE VIDEO AS A MOTIVE FOR THE ATTACK. That is still the case. I've linked the article and the information in this thread twice now.

 

[daveman]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

 

[catzmeow]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

Ironic, coming from a guy who hasn't even done his homework on this subject.

 

[daveman]

Romney's the one who tried to sneak a lie through.

Isn't it more important that the truth came out during the debate?

Obama blamed the murders on a movie for two weeks.. .knowing full well it was an organized terrorist attack that fully contracdicted his ridiculous assertions that Al Quadea is dead.

FACT.

The first source to blame the video was the New York Times, which published a story on 9/12/2012 linking the attack to a local militia group and stating that MEMBERS OF THE GROUP MENTIONED THE VIDEO AS A MOTIVE FOR THE ATTACK. That is still the case. I've linked the article and the information in this thread twice now.

In summary, Obama trusts the New York Times and terrorists more than he trusts his own State Department.

 

[daveman]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

Ironic, coming from a guy who hasn't even done his homework on this subject.

I agree, if by "hasn't done his homework" you mean "isn't immediately and unquestioningly believing everything The One says"

 

[J.E.D]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

I'm not denying reality at all. The reality of the situation is, conservatives are going ape-shit over Romney getting trounced in last night's debate.

 

[daveman]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

I'm not denying reality at all.

Wait for it...

The reality of the situation is, conservatives are going ape-shit over Romney getting trounced in last night's debate.

 

[EriktheRed]

Are you going to spam us for the rest of the night?

Depends. Are you going to keep denying reality in favor of kissing Obama's ass?

I'm not denying reality at all. The reality of the situation is, conservatives are going ape-shit over Romney getting trounced in last night's debate.

And they don't seem to understand, either, that they're the only people who really give a shit about this "terror" word distinction.