CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
another absurd leap in logic made by a twoofer.
everything that was "made public" must previously be HIDDEN.
it cant just be that the 12,000 pages of oral histories were gathered together and released together.
noooooooooooooo.....
it has to be HIDDEN in order for it to be made public!!
They were hidden because the NYT had to file a FOIA suit against New York and fought for over 3 years to get them released:
"The New York Times sought the records under the freedom of information law in February 2002, but the Bloomberg administration refused to make them public and the newspaper sued the city. Earlier this year, the Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, ordered the city to release most, but not all, of the records."
So why do you think they were "hidden"?
This is at least the fifth time you have avoided the question. I jumped through your hoops by providing the testimonies and proving NY kept them hidden from the public and it took over three years of court battles for the NYT to get them made public. Even then not all were released. I've been keeping my word. I can't make you keep your word but I can prevent wasting any more of my time if you dodge the question again.