Another Zimmerman thread -DOJ no civil right violation--LOL

Point is/was The Sanford police said it was self defense, NOT murder.
The jury said that it was self defense, NOT murder.

So essentially, m urder becomes okay if the cops and courts are incompetent.

NObody tell OJ.


Self-defense becomes necessary when parents fail to raise their kids to be law-abiding citizens.
Apparently, the parents were incompetent in the way they raise their kid.
Lesson learned: IF you wanna act like a rabid animal, you will put you down, like a rabid animal.
 
What evidence did the jury ignore? They didn't buy the bullshit that you're peddling here, Joey...but then again...neither did anyone else who looked at the facts of the case.

You know, dead kid, big old bullet hole in him. That evidence.


The jury ALSO looked at the evidence where Martin stalked Zimmerman, who was committing no crime, and Martin viciously attacked Zimmerman.
Martin forced Zimmerman to defend himself against a criminal thug.
The jury looked at ALL the relevant evidence in the case.
 
Self-defense becomes necessary when parents fail to raise their kids to be law-abiding citizens.
Apparently, the parents were incompetent in the way they raise their kid.
Lesson learned: IF you wanna act like a rabid animal, you will put you down, like a rabid animal.

And the person who does it will have his life ruined.

You get this, right. Zimmerman will never hold down another job for the rest of his life. He will never be able to show his face in polite company. A judge threw out his lawsuit against NBC, his wife left him, and even his girlfriend pool is getting a tad shallow.
 
Another lie, you have no proof either why. Again, the truth is something you don't like.

You are up to how many lies this thread? Tough to keep up, isn't it.

Yawn, guy, your boy Zimmerman is a disaster waiting to happen.

Not sure why you have so much invested in him, really....


We DO KNOW that Martin was willing and able to beat a law-abiding citizen to death.
It was just a matter of time before Martin attacked and viciously beat someone else, and the next time, the law-abiding citizen might not be armed, to stop the vicious attack.
Lesson learned: don't attack a law-abiding citizen that has a CCW and a 9 mm to back it up.
 
The jury ALSO looked at the evidence where Martin stalked Zimmerman, who was committing no crime, and Martin viciously attacked Zimmerman.
Martin forced Zimmerman to defend himself against a criminal thug.
The jury looked at ALL the relevant evidence in the case.

Only thing these ignorant crackers looked at, "He's white!"
 
We DO KNOW that Martin was willing and able to beat a law-abiding citizen to death.
It was just a matter of time before Martin attacked and viciously beat someone else, and the next time, the law-abiding citizen might not be armed, to stop the vicious attack.
Lesson learned: don't attack a law-abiding citizen that has a CCW and a 9 mm to back it up.

Do we know that? Because frankly, other than a lot of inuendo, you guys really didn't find any previous cases of violent acts.

On the other hand, Zimmerman's been arrested four times since his acquittal for hitting or threatening people.
 
Self-defense becomes necessary when parents fail to raise their kids to be law-abiding citizens.
Apparently, the parents were incompetent in the way they raise their kid.
Lesson learned: IF you wanna act like a rabid animal, you will put you down, like a rabid animal.

And the person who does it will have his life ruined.

You get this, right. Zimmerman will never hold down another job for the rest of his life. He will never be able to show his face in polite company. A judge threw out his lawsuit against NBC, his wife left him, and even his girlfriend pool is getting a tad shallow.


IF Zimmerman DIDN'T defend himself, he would most likely be maimed for life or dead, from the vicious attack at the hands of Martin.
Zimmerman did what any law-abiding citizen would've done, in the same circumstances.
It just galls you that a law-abiding citizen DARED to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug that was beating him un-mercilessly, err???
Stand by the news stations, MORE law-abiding citizens will be defending themselves against the criminal thugs.
Hopefully, they will all be good shots!!! :)
 
The jury ALSO looked at the evidence where Martin stalked Zimmerman, who was committing no crime, and Martin viciously attacked Zimmerman.
Martin forced Zimmerman to defend himself against a criminal thug.
The jury looked at ALL the relevant evidence in the case.

Only thing these ignorant crackers looked at, "He's white!"


Correction: The jury looked at the fact that Martin stalked Zimmerman and viciously attacked Zimmerman. Zimmerman was forced to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug.
..................... CASE CLOSED!!! :)
 
IF Zimmerman DIDN'T defend himself, he would most likely be maimed for life or dead, from the vicious attack at the hands of Martin.
Zimmerman did what any law-abiding citizen would've done, in the same circumstances.
It just galls you that a law-abiding citizen DARED to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug that was beating him un-mercilessly, err???

It galls me that a drug addled loser is walking around somewhere shooting children.

Stand by the news stations, MORE law-abiding citizens will be defending themselves against the criminal thugs.
Hopefully, they will all be good shots!!!

quite the contrary. Police will be more diligent in the future about performing real investigations when these things happen, like the guy who shot the teenage girl on his porch, or hte guy who shot the black kids because their music was too loud.
 
We DO KNOW that Martin was willing and able to beat a law-abiding citizen to death.
It was just a matter of time before Martin attacked and viciously beat someone else, and the next time, the law-abiding citizen might not be armed, to stop the vicious attack.
Lesson learned: don't attack a law-abiding citizen that has a CCW and a 9 mm to back it up.

Do we know that? Because frankly, other than a lot of inuendo, you guys really didn't find any previous cases of violent acts.

On the other hand, Zimmerman's been arrested four times since his acquittal for hitting or threatening people.
 
IF Zimmerman DIDN'T defend himself, he would most likely be maimed for life or dead, from the vicious attack at the hands of Martin.
Zimmerman did what any law-abiding citizen would've done, in the same circumstances.
It just galls you that a law-abiding citizen DARED to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug that was beating him un-mercilessly, err???

It galls me that a drug addled loser is walking around somewhere shooting children.

Stand by the news stations, MORE law-abiding citizens will be defending themselves against the criminal thugs.
Hopefully, they will all be good shots!!!

quite the contrary. Police will be more diligent in the future about performing real investigations when these things happen, like the guy who shot the teenage girl on his porch, or hte guy who shot the black kids because their music was too loud.


The police investigated Zimmernan-Martin and found it justifiable homocide, as did the jury.
The Grand jury refused to indict the good officer in Ferguson because he was defending himself against a criminal thug.
The police investigate all cases of self-defense. IF they are indeed self-defense, they don't put the person through hell, just to please the liberal race-baiters, as they did in Sanford Fl.
You need to come back to reality and admit that Martin was a thug that got what a person gets when he attacks a law-abiding citizen that is armed.
"MORE SELF DEFENSE SHOOTINGS TO COME".
 
Correction: The jury looked at the fact that Martin stalked Zimmerman and viciously attacked Zimmerman. Zimmerman was forced to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug.

Zimmerman will spend the rst of his hopefully short life in hiding. Until he kills someone else and tries to claim that was self-defense.


Martin shortened his live because he wanted to act like a criminal thug and attack a law-abiding citizen, who happened to be armed!
"live like an animal, die like an animal".
Zimmerman is alive because he defended himself against a vicious criminal thug.
 
The jury ALSO looked at the evidence where Martin stalked Zimmerman, who was committing no crime, and Martin viciously attacked Zimmerman.
Martin forced Zimmerman to defend himself against a criminal thug.
The jury looked at ALL the relevant evidence in the case.

Only thing these ignorant crackers looked at, "He's white!"


Correction: The jury looked at the fact that Martin stalked Zimmerman and viciously attacked Zimmerman. Zimmerman was forced to defend himself against a vicious criminal thug.
..................... CASE CLOSED!!! :)

yup exactly
 
It galls me that a drug addled loser is walking around somewhere shooting children.

What REALLY galls you, is that you can't go around lying your ass off withour getting called on it!
Then again, when have liberals EVER let the truth get in the way of a "good" lie!!
 
Again you lie, as I told you earlier but still seem to continue a lie. I don't own a gun, never will, so I am not a gun nutter. I have no interest in Zimmerman, you seem to,have a real hang up with him.

Yes, I have a hangup with people who murder children and then smirk about it. I'm just wondering why you don't.

Again, you lie. Zimmerman kills Martin, he did not murder Martin. You keep going round and round, nothing new, nothing but lies.
 
What evidence did the jury ignore? They didn't buy the bullshit that you're peddling here, Joey...but then again...neither did anyone else who looked at the facts of the case.

You know, dead kid, big old bullet hole in him. That evidence.

No one is disputing that Trayvon Martin was shot, you moron. Do you have any evidence that George Zimmerman wasn't being attacked by Martin when that took place? This case was always about one thing...did George Zimmerman have fear for his own life when he was attacked by Trayvon Martin? Unless you can prove that he didn't...then he was justified in using deadly force against the man who was attacking him.

That is what the jury correctly ruled on.

The jury ignored the media bias that had painted Martin as a fresh faced twelve year old and Zimmerman as a menacing racist gun nut and went with the facts that were presented to them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top