NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Name the bi-partisan compromises the GOP House is ready and willing to make.
Anyone...
A plea bargain for gun runner to the cartels, Eric Holder?
Another one who can't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Name the bi-partisan compromises the GOP House is ready and willing to make.
Anyone...
A plea bargain for gun runner to the cartels, Eric Holder?
Funny. Because every Republican President of the past 30 years was able to borrow and afford it.
Why can't a Democratic President be allowed to do that?
What hackery? I was responding to just that part so I quoted just that part.Hi, you have received -1985 reputation points from California Girl.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Don\'t snip my posts for your partisan hackery. Idiot.
Regards,
California Girl
Wow, you are WAY too sensitive to be on a forum.
Whining about negs is pathetic. Just so you know.
And... you snipped a perfectly rational, non partisan response and turned it into a whine about Dems and Republicans. That's hackery. You're a hack. Just embrace it. Some of us are capable of seeing the logic and assigning blame to both parties.... like me. You are not capable of that... must be hard for you but it makes no impact on me.
yo...you link me to a blog?
And no.....I disagree...it IS the same thing and has been for years.
You just dont want to recognize it.
Just because it's ablog doesn't mean it doesn't have worthwhile content. Democrats were willing to compromise with President Bush and Republicans were willing to compromise with Clinton. Republicans are not willing to compromise with President Obama.
see how you spin it? That is becuase you read blogs...
Now I will say the exact same thing without the spin of a blog....
Bush found a way to get the deomcrats to work with him.
Clinton found a way to get the republicans to work with him.
Obama has not been able to find a way to get the republicans to work with him.
FYI...the leader is to lead...not blame his inability to lead on those he is supposed to lead.
Just because it's ablog doesn't mean it doesn't have worthwhile content. Democrats were willing to compromise with President Bush and Republicans were willing to compromise with Clinton. Republicans are not willing to compromise with President Obama.
see how you spin it? That is becuase you read blogs...
Now I will say the exact same thing without the spin of a blog....
Bush found a way to get the deomcrats to work with him.
Clinton found a way to get the republicans to work with him.
Obama has not been able to find a way to get the republicans to work with him.
FYI...the leader is to lead...not blame his inability to lead on those he is supposed to lead.
Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.
Obstuct and blame.
Just because it's ablog doesn't mean it doesn't have worthwhile content. Democrats were willing to compromise with President Bush and Republicans were willing to compromise with Clinton. Republicans are not willing to compromise with President Obama.
see how you spin it? That is becuase you read blogs...
Now I will say the exact same thing without the spin of a blog....
Bush found a way to get the deomcrats to work with him.
Clinton found a way to get the republicans to work with him.
Obama has not been able to find a way to get the republicans to work with him.
FYI...the leader is to lead...not blame his inability to lead on those he is supposed to lead.
Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.
Obstuct and blame.
see how you spin it? That is becuase you read blogs...
Now I will say the exact same thing without the spin of a blog....
Bush found a way to get the deomcrats to work with him.
Clinton found a way to get the republicans to work with him.
Obama has not been able to find a way to get the republicans to work with him.
FYI...the leader is to lead...not blame his inability to lead on those he is supposed to lead.
Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.
Obstuct and blame.
Pretty much sums it up.
Another one who can't.
At what point did we start putting Bush's Wars on the books again?
Private sector has been increasing at an anemic rate- What you are missing is an ability to decipher the difference between state and local government decline as compared to federal government increases. (see chart)
But your chart does show federal employment now trending down, correct?
It also shows private employment trending up, correct?
Trending up for 2 years I'd add. So let me see if I have this right, you like the effects of Obamas policies, you just wish they would happen faster? Is that right?
What you ignore is that this is the worst recovery in our history, thanks to a private sector stunned by Obama's radical Leftist policies:
Name the bi-partisan compromises the GOP House is ready and willing to make.
You are demonstrating just how horrible of a 'leader' Hussein has proven to be.
Mental note to never elect a POTUS whose total executive experience amounts to having run his school newspaper.
You spelled "I can't name any" wrong.
But your chart does show federal employment now trending down, correct?
It also shows private employment trending up, correct?
Trending up for 2 years I'd add. So let me see if I have this right, you like the effects of Obamas policies, you just wish they would happen faster? Is that right?
What you ignore is that this is the worst recovery in our history, thanks to a private sector stunned by Obama's radical Leftist policies:
What radical leftist policies would those be?
see how you spin it? That is becuase you read blogs...
Now I will say the exact same thing without the spin of a blog....
Bush found a way to get the deomcrats to work with him.
Clinton found a way to get the republicans to work with him.
Obama has not been able to find a way to get the republicans to work with him.
FYI...the leader is to lead...not blame his inability to lead on those he is supposed to lead.
Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.
Obstuct and blame.
Wow...you really need to back off the blogs man.
as I already said...you can say it the blog way or you can say it the logical way.
Curious...did you give credit to the republican congress or to Clinton when Clinton was able to work with congress?