Another Fine Mess Obama's Gotten Us Into

[FJO]

Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.

Obstuct and blame.

Pretty much sums it up.

really?

and why were there republicans willing to comproimise with Clinton?
Why were there democrats willing to compromise with Bush?
and..
Why are the republicans not willing to compromise with Obama?

You think they are all racists?

Or is it maybe becuase Obama carries an air of arrogance...told the GOP to fuck off when he had the majority in both houses....continually mocks the GOP and spins their intentions....

You see...Obama is not a leader...he is a child in a mans body....only a child says "I won" and only a child continually blames those he "wants to work with" and then whines when they wont work with him.

He lacks the leadsership skills we need to see in a President.

That is what happens when you send a boy to do a man's job.

 

[RDD_1210]

Because there were democrats willing to compromise with Bush they were able to reach one. Because there were republicans willing to compromise with Clinton they were also able to reach a compromise. There are no republicans willing (not counting Snow) to compromise with Obama. It is truly a two way street. Your reasoning is exactly how they drew it up.

Obstuct and blame.

Pretty much sums it up.

really?

and why were there republicans willing to comproimise with Clinton?
Why were there democrats willing to compromise with Bush?
and..
Why are the republicans not willing to compromise with Obama?

You think they are all racists?

Or is it maybe becuase Obama carries an air of arrogance...told the GOP to fuck off when he had the majority in both houses....continually mocks the GOP and spins their intentions....

You see...Obama is not a leader...he is a child in a mans body....only a child says "I won" and only a child continually blames those he "wants to work with" and then whines when they wont work with him.

He lacks the leadsership skills we need to see in a President.

Or maybe it's because the republican party has been hijacked by a group of extremists who don't have the word compromise in their vocabulary?

 

[ConservaDerrps]

When exactly did Obama tell anyone to fuck off? I think that's Dick Cheney you're thinking of.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYY1oDDYS18]Cheney Says F Yourself on Senate Floor - YouTube[/ame]

 

[SniperFire]

Gee. I wonder what was different about those other recoveries...

No need to guess.

The private sector is stalled due to Obama and his Commies, and the States have battened down the hatches to survive the radical Leftist assault on them by the Federal gubmint.


But a new day is dawning soon!!

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Explosive GDP and tax receipts which enable States to expand programs and employment, of course!

You know - the exact opposite of this failed Obama recovery.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

So your claim, or rather the claim of Democratic Underground or whatever hate site does your thinking for you, is that there are less people employed by the federal government today than there were in 1991?

 

[SniperFire]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

 

[SniperFire]

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

So your claim, or rather the claim of Democratic Underground or whatever hate site does your thinking for you, is that there are less people employed by the federal government today than there were in 1991?

He hasn't the slightest idea, but that chart represents State employment, and the Y axis and scale are chosen for maximum Owebama apology.

LOL

 

[RDD_1210]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

Did Reagan ever raise taxes?

 

[Sallow]

Gee. I wonder what was different about those other recoveries...

No need to guess.

The private sector is stalled due to Obama and his Commies, and the States have battened down the hatches to survive the radical Leftist assault on them by the Federal gubmint.


But a new day is dawning soon!!

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Your kinda barking up the wrong tree here..

This poster has no cognitive skill..and basically parrots right wing talking points.

When you get him into the weeds..his inner fag wells up..and he offers to blow you.

 

[SniperFire]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

Did Reagan ever raise taxes?

You seem ignorant.

 

[SniperFire]

No need to guess.

The private sector is stalled due to Obama and his Commies, and the States have battened down the hatches to survive the radical Leftist assault on them by the Federal gubmint.


But a new day is dawning soon!!

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Your kinda barking up the wrong tree here..

This poster has no cognitive skill..and basically parrots right wing talking points.

When you get him into the weeds..his inner fag wells up..and he offers to blow you.

Swallow says 'OUCH!"

LOL

 

[Sallow]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

Did Reagan ever raise taxes?

Interestingly enough. Reagan's tax increases were legendary. In fact..historic.

Reagan presided over the biggest tax increases in history.

And then there was military spending on exotic weapon systems..that didn't work..

Whoo boy..howdy!

 

[RDD_1210]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

Did Reagan ever raise taxes?

You seem ignorant.

You seem unemployed and hypocritical, whats' your point?

Or are you going to start ignoring me again when your argument gets destroyed again, like it always does?

 

[ConservaDerrps]

No need to guess.

The private sector is stalled due to Obama and his Commies, and the States have battened down the hatches to survive the radical Leftist assault on them by the Federal gubmint.


But a new day is dawning soon!!

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Explosive GDP and tax receipts which enable States to expand programs and employment, of course!

You know - the exact opposite of this failed Obama recovery.

Here, since you're obviously not smart enough to figure out, Gramps, let me do it for you:

This chart shows four different four-year recessions. One under Reagan, one under Bush I, one under Bush II, and one under Obama. The lines represent the amount of public sector employment for each of those recessions. In every single Republican administration, the amount of government jobs went UP. Which adds to the GDP, Dinkus, because it creates jobs, and those jobs carry with them paychecks. Those paychecks carry with them income taxes, sales taxes, use taxes, etc.

All of the Republican presidents before increased public sector employment as a means of bolstering the economy DURING A RECESSION. But imagine what would happen if Obama proposed an EXPANSION of government employment. The Tea Part would literally shit a purple Twinkie. And who would keep Rush from eating that Twinkie?

Also, if we had the 600,000 jobs back that were cut in the public sector, unemployment would be at 7.8%, not the 8.3 or 8.4 it's at now. Further, if Obama were to be allowed to add government jobs at the rate that his REPUBLICAN predecessors did, unemployment would be around 7.3%, not that far off from what Mitt The Wonder Douche claims he'd have it down to himself.

So basically, Shit-Mitts, you Fucksticks insisting we shrink the size of the government is:

1) Counter-intuitive to what your own Presidents have done before
2) Helping to further hurt the economy.

And boom goes the dynamite.

 

[Sallow]

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Your kinda barking up the wrong tree here..

This poster has no cognitive skill..and basically parrots right wing talking points.

When you get him into the weeds..his inner fag wells up..and he offers to blow you.

Swallow says 'OUCH!"

LOL

FaggotFire says "Slurp"..

 

[SniperFire]

In Reagan's recovery, for example, we had 1.1 million new jobs created in just ONE MONTH.

Did Reagan ever raise taxes?

Interestingly enough. Reagan's tax increases were legendary. In fact..historic.

More fail.

Reagan was a net tax cutter.

 

[ConservaDerrps]

No need to guess.

The private sector is stalled due to Obama and his Commies, and the States have battened down the hatches to survive the radical Leftist assault on them by the Federal gubmint.


But a new day is dawning soon!!

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Your kinda barking up the wrong tree here..

This poster has no cognitive skill..and basically parrots right wing talking points.

When you get him into the weeds..his inner fag wells up..and he offers to blow you.

I don't know what homosexuality necessarily has to do with him. I just now his intellectuality (probably not a word) is severely lacking.

 

[SniperFire]

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Explosive GDP and tax receipts which enable States to expand programs and employment, of course!

You know - the exact opposite of this failed Obama recovery.

Here, since you're obviously not smart enough to figure out, Gramps, let me do it for you:

I explained it to you about 6 posts ago, derp.

Do try to keep up with me.

 

[RDD_1210]

Yeah. So you clearly don't know what that chart shows, do you? C'mon, take a guess. What do you think each one of those lines represents?

Your kinda barking up the wrong tree here..

This poster has no cognitive skill..and basically parrots right wing talking points.

When you get him into the weeds..his inner fag wells up..and he offers to blow you.

I don't know what homosexuality necessarily has to do with him. I just now his intellectuality (probably not a word) is severely lacking.

You'll learn soon enough that he has an overwhelming obsession with homosexuality and fellatio.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

No one ever had the impression that an unaccomplished , community organizing, no show short term senator could handle the presidency................

No one but civil servants, clueless adolescent occupiers, homosexuals, single welfare mothers, socialist professors, and blacks that is............Yes They Did !!!!!!!!!!!!!!