Ann Coulter's Answer to Canada!

[Mr.Fitnah]

Jihad against those who oppress Muslims is a duty incumbent on every Muslim of sound body and mind. This is not limited to physical warfare.

What the Quran say about Mohammad

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

What Mohammad says about what Mohammad does


'Abdullah bin 'Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, reported:
Allah's Messenger said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, perform the Prayer, and pay Zakah. If they do that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
Display

Only muslims pay zakah

 

[Kalam]

Huh, so you're a white muslim, living in the US... who is very concerned about the Sudanese persecution of Black Muslims in the Sudan; where the Black Muslims happen to be the majority of the population... which is a rather odd sensitivity for a white Muslim...

You seem to be very confused. Dark-skinned Arabs are the dominant ethnic group in Sudan.

President Umar al-Bashir:

If you've heard of Darfur, the victims of the genocide there are black African Muslims who come from non-Arabic speaking tribes.

Rebel leader Khalil Ibrahim (JEM):

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Again, a guest, invited or not, is obligated to abide by the rules of the host.

A position which is dripping with the implication that the invited guest violated the rules of the host...

It's really that simple.

Of course it is; what else could a position be that originates from a simpleton?

Coulter couldn't abide by that simple fact

What violation of the Canadian Law did Coulter commit? This is a question which has been set to you at least a dozen times in the preceding 23 pages... and to this point it is a question which you've shown NO MEANS TO ANSWER...

and when college students protested, as is their right, she cowardly ran from her speaking engagement forcing the college to cancel.

Ahh... So it's Coulter's fault that the College cancelled the engagement, because the Students exercised their right to violently protest a woman's right to speak... Now that IS a fascinating right indeed. No dount you've CONSTRUED this right yourself.

Tell us Ravi; what right do you have to prevent an invited guest from speaking? From where does such a right come? In what principle does such a right rest?

Have the last word, Pubic. It won't change the facts.

Well even a blind nut finds a squirrel now and then... You're correct, my having the last word will neither change the facts nor will my adherence to, or advocacy for those facts... change them. But it is a certainty that your fabrication and deceitful insertion of your own, would-be facts, will also not set aside the facts which rest in reality.

You've lost yet another debate Ravi... but try to find solace in the certainty that you had lost this debate before you scrawled your first delusion... As you do not possess the intellectual means to do anything but lose.

It's what ya do; it is who ya are.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Huh, so you're a white muslim, living in the US... who is very concerned about the Sudanese persecution of Black Muslims in the Sudan; where the Black Muslims happen to be the majority of the population... which is a rather odd sensitivity for a white Muslim...

You seem to be very confused. Dark-skinned Arabs are the dominant ethnic group in Sudan.

President Umar al-Bashir:

If you've heard of Darfur, the victims of the genocide there are black African Muslims who come from non-Arabic speaking tribes.

Rebel leader Khalil Ibrahim (JEM):

Huh... I suppose being a Canadian Socialist provides that you're also an expert in the Sudan and it's ethnic and religious demographics..



Sudanese Ethnic groups

black 52%, Arab 39%, Beja 6%, foreigners 2%, other 1%
Religions

Sunni Muslim 70% (in north), Christian 5% (mostly in south and Khartoum), indigenous beliefs 25%

Now I wonder how a 39% Arab Minority, overcomes the 52% black majority... in a nation where the religion in question represents 70% of the total population?

Break it down for us...

 

[Kalam]

'Abdullah bin 'Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, reported:
Allah's Messenger said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, perform the Prayer, and pay Zakah. If they do that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.

"It refers to fighting those who are waging war, whom Allah has permitted us to fight. It does not refer to those who have a covenant with us and with whom Allah commands us to fulfill our covenant." - Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328 CE), Majmu al-Fatawa 19/20​

Yawn.

 

[Kalam]

Huh... I suppose being a Canadian Socialist

What?

provides that you're also an expert in the Sudan and it's ethnic and religious demographics

....

Now I wonder how a 39% Arab Minority, overcomes the 52% black majority... in a nation where the religion in question represents 70% of the total population?

Break it down for us...

Are you asking me how a minority can consolidate political power and oppress a much larger ethnic group? Are you completely unfamiliar with the modern history of Africa...?

Arabs control the government in Khartoum. Blacks do not. In response to ethnic oppression, blacks formed resistance movements (JEM, SLA, etc.) in attempt to secure their rights. Meanwhile, Arab nomads began raiding black villages in Darfur in an attempt to secure land for grazing. The Arab-dominated government began funding and arming these raiders in response to insurgent activity. There's your Darfur conflict in a nutshell.

 

[L.K.Eder]

"the provost of the university of ottawa, average student iq: 0, wrote to me—widely disseminating his letter to at least a half-dozen intermediaries before it reached me—in advance of my visit in order to recommend that i familiarize myself with canada's criminal laws regarding hate speech.

What other speakers get a warning not to promote hatred? Did francois a. Houle send a similarly worded letter to israel-hater omar barghouti before he spoke last year at u of ottawa? ("ottawa": Indian for "land of the bed-wetters.")

how about angela davis, communist party member and former black panther who spoke at the university of zero just last month?

Or do only conservatives get letters admonishing them to be civil? Or—my suspicion—is it only conservative women who fuel francois' rage?

I'm sure canada's human rights commission will get to the bottom of francois' strange warning to me, inasmuch as i will be filing a complaint with that august body, so i expect they will be reviewing every letter the university has sent to other speakers prior to their speeches to see if any of them were threatened with criminal prosecution.

Curiously, however, there was no evidence that either the cartoons or the column did, in fact, incite hatred toward muslims—nor was there the remotest possibility that they would.

By contrast, conservative speakers are regularly subjected to violent attacks on college campuses. Bill kristol, pat buchanan, david horowitz and i have all been the targets of infamous campus attacks.

At the risk of violating anyone's positive space, what happened to canada? How did the country that gave us jim carrey, mike myers, martin short, dan aykroyd and catherine o'hara suddenly become a bunch of whining crybabies? "
conservative news: Coulter - university of ottawa, parliament condemn speech as "hate speech" - human events

bbbbbwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


stop your whining you crazy bitch with an adam's apple

What an intelligent repost.

Glad to see you achieving up to your abilities.

Let's see if we can translate from our compendium of "Idiot to English."

1. You were showing how very facile you are on the keyboard: "bbbbbwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
No doubt your progressive kindergarten was thrilled at your successful preformance! Bravo!

2. You misunderstood the adult attempt to support a thesis with examples, as some sort of whining. I understand your error, as this is a new phenomenon to you.

3. Unable to articulate a clear and cogent rebuttal, you rely on vulgar references that must have been considered clever at family gatherings. So clever, so original.

4. An ad hominem attack in place of the rational counter-argument which you are unable to mount.

Let me guess: you must be of the liberal persusion. True?

riposte

 

[PoliticalChic]

bbbbbwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


stop your whining you crazy bitch with an adam's apple

What an intelligent repost.

Glad to see you achieving up to your abilities.

Let's see if we can translate from our compendium of "Idiot to English."

1. You were showing how very facile you are on the keyboard: "bbbbbwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
No doubt your progressive kindergarten was thrilled at your successful preformance! Bravo!

2. You misunderstood the adult attempt to support a thesis with examples, as some sort of whining. I understand your error, as this is a new phenomenon to you.

3. Unable to articulate a clear and cogent rebuttal, you rely on vulgar references that must have been considered clever at family gatherings. So clever, so original.

4. An ad hominem attack in place of the rational counter-argument which you are unable to mount.

Let me guess: you must be of the liberal persusion. True?

riposte

Thank you.
While yours is the more often seen form,

"A thrust given in return after parrying a lunge; A quick and usually witty response to a taunt; An answer or reply, rapidly uttered, in response "
ripost - Wiktionary

this alternative form is also acceptable.

 

[L.K.Eder]

What an intelligent repost.

Glad to see you achieving up to your abilities.

Let's see if we can translate from our compendium of "Idiot to English."

1. You were showing how very facile you are on the keyboard: "bbbbbwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
No doubt your progressive kindergarten was thrilled at your successful preformance! Bravo!

2. You misunderstood the adult attempt to support a thesis with examples, as some sort of whining. I understand your error, as this is a new phenomenon to you.

3. Unable to articulate a clear and cogent rebuttal, you rely on vulgar references that must have been considered clever at family gatherings. So clever, so original.

4. An ad hominem attack in place of the rational counter-argument which you are unable to mount.

Let me guess: you must be of the liberal persusion. True?

riposte

Thank you.
While yours is the more often seen form,

"A thrust given in return after parrying a lunge; A quick and usually witty response to a taunt; An answer or reply, rapidly uttered, in response "
ripost - Wiktionary

this alternative form is also acceptable.

yeah, maybe. but not "repost" if you know what i mean.

 

[PoliticalChic]

riposte

Thank you.
While yours is the more often seen form,

"A thrust given in return after parrying a lunge; A quick and usually witty response to a taunt; An answer or reply, rapidly uttered, in response "
ripost - Wiktionary

this alternative form is also acceptable.

yeah, maybe. but not "repost" if you know what i mean.

There are so few of us who can quibble over spelling, grammar, etc. that I must tell you that I actually appreciate it.

I hope that it will nudge more of our fellow posters in that direction.

When I checked 'repost,' I intended to give you a rep if it was incorrect.

Thanks just the same.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

'Abdullah bin 'Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, reported:
Allah's Messenger said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, perform the Prayer, and pay Zakah. If they do that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.

"It refers to fighting those who are waging war, whom Allah has permitted us to fight. It does not refer to those who have a covenant with us and with whom Allah commands us to fulfill our covenant." - Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328 CE), Majmu al-Fatawa 19/20​

Yawn.

You mean spin .
Ibn-Taymiyyah is not the"prophet" of Islam.
Mohammad is
My full post again

Jihad against those who oppress Muslims is a duty incumbent on every Muslim of sound body and mind. This is not limited to physical warfare.

What the Quran says about Mohammad

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

What Mohammad says about what Mohammad does


'Abdullah bin 'Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, reported:
Allah's Messenger said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, perform the Prayer, and pay Zakah. If they do that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
Display

Only muslims pay zakah

The same sentiment are in the Quran.
8:39

And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world[]]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do
2:193.
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone).[] But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc193

http://www.ummah.com/what-is-islam/quran/noble/

http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=8&tid=20140

http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=2&tid=5008

http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=2&tid=5035

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Huh... I suppose being a Canadian Socialist

What?

provides that you're also an expert in the Sudan and it's ethnic and religious demographics

....

Now I wonder how a 39% Arab Minority, overcomes the 52% black majority... in a nation where the religion in question represents 70% of the total population?

Break it down for us...

Are you asking me how a minority can consolidate political power and oppress a much larger ethnic group? Are you completely unfamiliar with the modern history of Africa...?

Arabs control the government in Khartoum. Blacks do not. In response to ethnic oppression, blacks formed resistance movements (JEM, SLA, etc.) in attempt to secure their rights. Meanwhile, Arab nomads began raiding black villages in Darfur in an attempt to secure land for grazing. The Arab-dominated government began funding and arming these raiders in response to insurgent activity. There's your Darfur conflict in a nutshell.

First, I wasn't asking you... the response was to Toro.

But setting that aside...

So you're saying that Muslims are control the Sudanese Governemnt and are oppressing the population?

Again... no surprise there. That's the trend wherever Muslims control power.

It is hilarious tho' that you feel that the color of the controlling Muslim's skin, being slightly askew; a few shades lighter than those that they are controlling, somehow represents the problem.

What tickles me the most about you people, is how you seem to be incapable of admitting that most of the planets current conflicts involve Muslims...

Naturally, you'll discuss the individual war zones; and in each case declare the Muslims on the defensive. Islarael -v- Islam... Teeny tiny little country about the size of a US county... can't exist; and keep you people happy.

What ya also do not seem to grasp is that you're fast becoming anathema to civilization... "The Religion of Peace" thing is playing out fast...

Best grab a clue or prepare yourself for martyrdom, slick...

 

[Foxfyre]

Huh... I suppose being a Canadian Socialist

What?

provides that you're also an expert in the Sudan and it's ethnic and religious demographics

....

Now I wonder how a 39% Arab Minority, overcomes the 52% black majority... in a nation where the religion in question represents 70% of the total population?

Break it down for us...

Are you asking me how a minority can consolidate political power and oppress a much larger ethnic group? Are you completely unfamiliar with the modern history of Africa...?

Arabs control the government in Khartoum. Blacks do not. In response to ethnic oppression, blacks formed resistance movements (JEM, SLA, etc.) in attempt to secure their rights. Meanwhile, Arab nomads began raiding black villages in Darfur in an attempt to secure land for grazing. The Arab-dominated government began funding and arming these raiders in response to insurgent activity. There's your Darfur conflict in a nutshell.

First, I wasn't asking you... the response was to Toro.

But setting that aside...

So you're saying that Muslims are control the Sudanese Governemnt and are oppressing the population?

Again... no surprise there. That's the trend wherever Muslims control power.

It is hilarious tho' that you feel that the color of the controlling Muslim's skin, being slightly askew; a few shades lighter than those that they are controlling, somehow represents the problem.

What tickles me the most about you people, is how you seem to be incapable of admitting that most of the planets current conflicts involve Muslims...

Naturally, you'll discuss the individual war zones; and in each case declare the Muslims on the defensive. Islarael -v- Islam... Teeny tiny little country about the size of a US county... can't exist; and keep you people happy.

What ya also do not seem to grasp is that you're fast becoming anathema to civilization... "The Religion of Peace" thing is playing out fast...

Best grab a clue or prepare yourself for martyrdom, slick...

There seem to be three threads running through the socioeconomic and political fabric of the world's populations these days.

1) A resurgence of national pride and appreciation of personal liberties and desire for freedom to seek one's own destiny.

2) A relentless encroachment of Marxist socialism coupled with a vague concept of one world government that is eroding national identities, personal liberties, and freedom.

3) A persistent and deadly spread of fanatical religious totalitarianism that, in the present space and time, is manifested mostly in militant Islam.

What are the chances that the group in #1 can resist and reject those in Groups #2 and #3?

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

What?


Are you asking me how a minority can consolidate political power and oppress a much larger ethnic group? Are you completely unfamiliar with the modern history of Africa...?

Arabs control the government in Khartoum. Blacks do not. In response to ethnic oppression, blacks formed resistance movements (JEM, SLA, etc.) in attempt to secure their rights. Meanwhile, Arab nomads began raiding black villages in Darfur in an attempt to secure land for grazing. The Arab-dominated government began funding and arming these raiders in response to insurgent activity. There's your Darfur conflict in a nutshell.

First, I wasn't asking you... the response was to Toro.

But setting that aside...

So you're saying that Muslims are control the Sudanese Governemnt and are oppressing the population?

Again... no surprise there. That's the trend wherever Muslims control power.

It is hilarious tho' that you feel that the color of the controlling Muslim's skin, being slightly askew; a few shades lighter than those that they are controlling, somehow represents the problem.

What tickles me the most about you people, is how you seem to be incapable of admitting that most of the planets current conflicts involve Muslims...

Naturally, you'll discuss the individual war zones; and in each case declare the Muslims on the defensive. Islarael -v- Islam... Teeny tiny little country about the size of a US county... can't exist; and keep you people happy.

What ya also do not seem to grasp is that you're fast becoming anathema to civilization... "The Religion of Peace" thing is playing out fast...

Best grab a clue or prepare yourself for martyrdom, slick...

There seem to be three threads running through the socioeconomic and political fabric of the world's populations these days.

1) A resurgence of national pride and appreciation of personal liberties and desire for freedom to seek one's own destiny.

2) A relentless encroachment of Marxist socialism coupled with a vague concept of one world government that is eroding national identities, personal liberties, and freedom.

3) A persistent and deadly spread of fanatical religious totalitarianism that, in the present space and time, is manifested mostly in militant Islam.

What are the chances that the group in #1 can resist and reject those in Groups #2 and #3?

Oh I think it's inevitable...

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Kalam's response to Monsieur Coulter on behalf of Canada:

and on behalf of Ann Coulter and freedom-loving Americans you can...

 

[Kalam]

Kalam's response to Monsieur Coulter on behalf of Canada:

...

and on behalf of Ann Coulter and freedom-loving Americans you can...

...

Wow! That sure would have been funny had it not taken you four days to post a response!

 

[Kalam]

So you're saying that Muslims are control the Sudanese Governemnt and are oppressing the population?

Again... no surprise there. That's the trend wherever Muslims control power.

It is hilarious tho' that you feel that the color of the controlling Muslim's skin, being slightly askew; a few shades lighter than those that they are controlling, somehow represents the problem.

The problem is tribal. Non-Arabic speaking tribes (which are -- you guessed it -- black) are oppressed by Arabic-speaking tribes.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Kalam's response to Monsieur Coulter on behalf of Canada:

...

and on behalf of Ann Coulter and freedom-loving Americans you can...

...

Wow! That sure would have been funny had it not taken you four days to post a response!

Better late than never....but you can post it on your wall as a standing reminder...

 

[Kalam]

Better late than never....

Not always. Posting a comeback to something written four days earlier, for example, makes you look like more of a desperate tool than you would if you had stayed silent.

but you can post it on your wall as a standing reminder...

Keep dreaming, Cleetus. I hope they sandwich you between two fat, long-bearded Saudis the next time you fly.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Better late than never....

Not always. Posting a comeback to something written four days earlier, for example, makes you look like more of a desperate tool than you would if you had stayed silent.

but you can post it on your wall as a standing reminder...

Keep dreaming, Cleetus. I hope they sandwich you between two fat, long-bearded Saudis the next time you fly.

Too bad we don't have a magic carpet to fly creeps like you outta America...

...but as yet they are still being woven....