Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.Allegedly I think is what you got there…Where is the beef?
You asked for connections, you got them.
All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
You missed my point, the Clintons are above the law.… And don't forget the Clinton sex trafficking ring.
I'm sorry, where is Hilary selling uranium to the Russians on this list?
lol, and now the desperate Rustic tries to hijack his own thread!!!
Classic messageboard stumblefuckery.
Which does nothing to contradict anything I said.Which is the wrong word to use. If that's all we're talking about, there are a heck of a lot of democrats with "connection" to Russians as well. What everyone is like all worked up about and stuff is whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) and the Russian government to throw the election. Of that, there continues to be no evidence.Not according to Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin, Maxine Waters and James Clapper, who have all said they have seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.The connections per se have been proven, your denial notwithstanding.
The word in the thread title is 'connection'.
But we all knew that.
Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.
The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.Allegedly I think is what you got there…Where is the beef?
You asked for connections, you got them.
All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
[ (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) .
But according to Feinstein, Manchin, Waters and Clapper after three Congressional investigations and a year long FBI investigation there are no facts to support the notion that any crimes have committed.Which is the wrong word to use. If that's all we're talking about, there are a heck of a lot of democrats with "connection" to Russians as well. What everyone is like all worked up about and stuff is whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) and the Russian government to throw the election. Of that, there continues to be no evidence.Not according to Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin, Maxine Waters and James Clapper, who have all said they have seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.The connections per se have been proven, your denial notwithstanding.
The word in the thread title is 'connection'.
But we all knew that.
Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.
The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.
Ah yes, the moldy old blanket got a spray of Febreeze.[ (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) .
Trump is now being accused of firing Comey to try to kill the Russian investigation, so you're wrong even on that point.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.Allegedly I think is what you got there…Where is the beef?
You asked for connections, you got them.
All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
… And don't forget the Clinton sex trafficking ring.
I'm sorry, where is Hilary selling uranium to the Russians on this list?
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.Allegedly I think is what you got there…You asked for connections, you got them.
All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
… And don't forget the Clinton sex trafficking ring.
I'm sorry, where is Hilary selling uranium to the Russians on this list?
As long as you keep making that accusation, nobody will forget your claim, but you should know by now that nobody but crazies believe it.
I know, it's like trying to match a movie to a Benghazi...the soap opera continues
the soap opera continues
You missed my point, the Clintons are above the law.… And don't forget the Clinton sex trafficking ring.
I'm sorry, where is Hilary selling uranium to the Russians on this list?
lol, and now the desperate Rustic tries to hijack his own thread!!!
Classic messageboard stumblefuckery.
Bill Clinton was impeached you idiot. He faced the full force of federal law.
Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.
The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.
… And don't forget the Clinton sex trafficking ring.
I'm sorry, where is Hilary selling uranium to the Russians on this list?
As long as you keep making that accusation, nobody will forget your claim, but you should know by now that nobody but crazies believe it.
Crazies?
The Clinton Foundation received millions from investors as Putin took over 20% of US uranium deposits
The real Russian scandal involved Hillary's dealing with her Clinton Foundation and the Russians obtaining uranium. However, you will never see anyone investigate this nor will you ever see the press pursue it as much as you see them attacking Trump today.
I know, it's like trying to match a movie to a Benghazi...the soap opera continues
Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.
The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.
You are missing an important difference. After 10 months there was evidence of a crime. Hell after 30 seconds of investigating there was evidence of a crime with Hillary's emails.
After 10 months they are no closer to "the truth". So how long does the investigation have to go on for before Democrats will let it go? 1 year, 4 years, 8 years?
Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.
The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.
You are missing an important difference. After 10 months there was evidence of a crime. Hell after 30 seconds of investigating there was evidence of a crime with Hillary's emails.
After 10 months they are no closer to "the truth". So how long does the investigation have to go on for before Democrats will let it go? 1 year, 4 years, 8 years?
