...and still no russian connection

The evidence piles higher and higher every day and RWNJs' denials can't change that. This desperate and ridiculous hiding behind lies about Hillary are proof of two things - one is that the RWNJs are desperate to get away from the truth and two, that they really don't care WHAT is done. They only care who does it.

The trumpkins are willfully ignorant. That's their choice.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Show me this "evidence piling higher and higher", what is it and who has it? Cuz I haven't seen squat yet.
 
The connections per se have been proven, your denial notwithstanding.
Not according to Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin, Maxine Waters and James Clapper, who have all said they have seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

The word in the thread title is 'connection'.
Which is the wrong word to use. If that's all we're talking about, there are a heck of a lot of democrats with "connection" to Russians as well. What everyone is like all worked up about and stuff is whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) and the Russian government to throw the election. Of that, there continues to be no evidence.

But we all knew that.

Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.

The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.

There's a LOT more to this but, funny thing is, the right wants it to go away.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Of course. We all want to know who in the Obama administration used ill-gotten intel against the Trump campaign.
 
Allegedly I think is what you got there…

All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.

Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.
 
All of those connections are facts. Fact. lol
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.

Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later
 
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.

Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later
No, the FBI investigation was into who did it, not Crooked Hillary's fuck up.
 
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.

Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later

If it wasn't so easy, zinging these people would be great fun.
 
The connections per se have been proven, your denial notwithstanding.
Not according to Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin, Maxine Waters and James Clapper, who have all said they have seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

The word in the thread title is 'connection'.
Which is the wrong word to use. If that's all we're talking about, there are a heck of a lot of democrats with "connection" to Russians as well. What everyone is like all worked up about and stuff is whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) and the Russian government to throw the election. Of that, there continues to be no evidence.

But we all knew that.

Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.

The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.

There's a LOT more to this but, funny thing is, the right wants it to go away.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
No, there are no facts that provide evidence of any connection between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. These "connections" are simply with Russians, but not with the Russian government.

Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later
lol That was the investigation? The FBI has been investigating allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government for a year without producing a single piece of evidence to support these allegations. Clearly they learned in the first 12 hours everything they were going to learn in the next 364 1/2 days. Clinton was clearly guilty of gross negligence in Benghazi but there is not a single piece of evidence that there was any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
 
Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later

If it wasn't so easy, zinging these people would be great fun.
If you weren't so stupid, you wouldn't think you "zinged" anyone.
 
Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later

If it wasn't so easy, zinging these people would be great fun.
I enjoy zinging you all daily. I agree.
 
the soap opera continues

Something everyday ...lol

Screen-Shot-2017-05-11-at-9.53.06-AM.png
 
Not according to Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin, Maxine Waters and James Clapper, who have all said they have seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

The word in the thread title is 'connection'.
Which is the wrong word to use. If that's all we're talking about, there are a heck of a lot of democrats with "connection" to Russians as well. What everyone is like all worked up about and stuff is whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign (no one is even bothering to accuse Trump himself any more) and the Russian government to throw the election. Of that, there continues to be no evidence.

But we all knew that.

Investigations are what happen where there reasonable belief that crimes may have been committed based on information already available.

The GOP thought Benghazi was worth 4 years of investigating.

There's a LOT more to this but, funny thing is, the right wants it to go away.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Even if true that is a distinction without a difference.
So you think it is ok for the FBI to continue investigations without any reasonable basis for believing a crime was committed.

You mean like all those Benghazi investigations?
Further evidence you suffer from brain rot. There was never an FBI investigation of Clinton's tragic fuck up in Benghazi.

FBI arrived in Benghazi on Thursday to investigate the terror attack and left 12 hours later
lol That was the investigation? The FBI has been investigating allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government for a year without producing a single piece of evidence to support these allegations. Clearly they learned in the first 12 hours everything they were going to learn in the next 364 1/2 days. Clinton was clearly guilty of gross negligence in Benghazi but there is not a single piece of evidence that there was any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Benghazi is over. All the investigations didn't turn out like you wanted. Get over it.
 

073e015f394353bdfce2e858f15a547a.jpg


Laughing at these morons has always been a pleasure. Now that the DNC has officially embraced the conspiracy theories (which, they of course projected Trump was making with his election fraud speaks)... the possibilities for laughs are endless.
 
You would think 20 months of constant surveillance ordered by Obama Bin Lying would have found something by now.

This is nothing but a distraction and a way to slow down the legislative agenda and a desperate attempt by the dems to stop from getting boot stomped in 2018.

The left has nothing to offer America or give to America.

They only Take from America.
 

Forum List

Back
Top