America is on track to admit the fewest refugees in four decades

Damn, you all are a bunch of entitled assholes. A little ego check seems much needed here

You seem upset.
No, I’m having a great day. I don’t let other people opinions effect my mood, especially strangers. It is rather sad and disappointing though to see some of the sentiments expressed on this board though.

By all means tell us how many refugees you would let in, there's billions of poor people in the world who would love to come here so how many 1 billion? 2 billion? Pick a number. I love when the bleeding hearts step on this bear trap.

Are you saying the United States with its population of 330 million can't save the billions of poor people in the world?
 
Damn, you all are a bunch of entitled assholes. A little ego check seems much needed here

You seem upset.
No, I’m having a great day. I don’t let other people opinions effect my mood, especially strangers. It is rather sad and disappointing though to see some of the sentiments expressed on this board though.

By all means tell us how many refugees you would let in, there's billions of poor people in the world who would love to come here so how many 1 billion? 2 billion? Pick a number. I love when the bleeding hearts step on this bear trap.

Are you saying the United States with its population of 330 million can't save the billions of poor people in the world?

I don't know how liberal bleeding hearts sleep at night when there are billions of poor people in the world desperate to come to America.
 
Keeping his promise I suppose.

America is on track to admit the fewest refugees in four decades

In his first week in office, Donald Trump hastily signed a travel ban, suspending all refugee admissions for 120 days, which plunged travellers’ plans into chaos and triggered mass protests. The travel ban has been withdrawn and resuscitated several times in response to legal challenges. Its third incarnation, which is still in effect, will be challenged before the Supreme Court next week. It has already had a drastic impact on refugee admissions.


This is good, but we still have lots of work to do.
 
Last edited:
Under American law, the executive branch has nearly complete authority over refugee policy. With minimal involvement from Congress, the president can set a cap on the annual number of refugees admitted. Mr Trump, for example, has set this cap to 45,000—the lowest ever—though the actual number will be less than half that. So long as the White House does not articulate a policy of explicit exclusion, the chances of a successful court challenge are low. “They’ve clearly found a legal way to enforce the Muslim ban,” says Mark Hetfield, the president of HIAS, a refugee-resettlement agency. “They’ve realised that they can turn up the security vetting and keep everyone out.”

So even if the Dems win one of the Chambers, Donnie "Tangerine" Trump can still control the numbers.



 
This is key to why we should limit immigration. I said limit, not stop it.

 
Damn, you all are a bunch of entitled assholes. A little ego check seems much needed here

You seem upset.
No, I’m having a great day. I don’t let other people opinions effect my mood, especially strangers. It is rather sad and disappointing though to see some of the sentiments expressed on this board though.

By all means tell us how many refugees you would let in, there's billions of poor people in the world who would love to come here so how many 1 billion? 2 billion? Pick a number. I love when the bleeding hearts step on this bear trap.
I’m not saying we should let them all in. But I’m also not celebrating the reduction of aid to the needy and suffering like many in this thread are. If we do reduce our numbers it should be done with heavy hearts not confetti
 
Damn, you all are a bunch of entitled assholes. A little ego check seems much needed here

You seem upset.
No, I’m having a great day. I don’t let other people opinions effect my mood, especially strangers. It is rather sad and disappointing though to see some of the sentiments expressed on this board though.
which ones??
so you ARE sad :itsok: ...you just admitted it..Freudian slip
Did I say that I was sad or did I say that IT was sad? Are you having trouble with English today?
 
Why are third world savages who hate Whites and hate White civilization whose ancestors created Western Civilization and think Whites enslaved darkies for massive profits in Alabama or something feel so compelled to invade The West?
 
Damn, you all are a bunch of entitled assholes. A little ego check seems much needed here

You seem upset.
No, I’m having a great day. I don’t let other people opinions effect my mood, especially strangers. It is rather sad and disappointing though to see some of the sentiments expressed on this board though.
which ones??
so you ARE sad :itsok: ...you just admitted it..Freudian slip
Did I say that I was sad or did I say that IT was sad? Are you having trouble with English today?
you just made a dumbass out of yourself
YOU have trouble with the English language
''it''s CANNOT be sad---per the definition below ..''it''s do not have feelings--only humans
'it' cannot be unhappy--it is not human
so it must be YOU that FEELS sad
sad
sad/
adjective
  1. 1.
    feeling or showing sorrow; unhappy.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top