Amarosa Credibility - Zero

Has Omarosa ever used the N-word?
Maybe we should compile a list of all the celebrity blacks who have used the N word. Who...when.....where....how. I wonder if we could finish that list in one day.
Or used the words whitey, cracker, redneck, hillbilly, and on and on and on.

To answer your last question, uhh no you wouldn't be able to finish that list because it would be 10 miles long.
 
McCain was a hero. You are lying little weasel. The lie about McCain has been thoroughly discredited. Take your shit and shove it.

He was labeling every Mexican who came into the US a murderer or rapist which is false. The statistics show you are lying.

He did mock someone who had a disability. All your lying will not change that.

As to the so-called thousands who celebrated when the WTC was bombed, Politifacts looked at this claim and found it to be Pants on Fire. Didn't happen.

Fact-checking Trump's claim that thousands in New Jersey cheered when World Trade Center tumbled
HA HA HA. "Politifact" Can you believe this numbskull is using Politifact as a source ? Pheeeew! :puhleeze: :slap:

Politifact Is a Joke

Oh, and we're supposed to cast aside a clear & convincing sourcelink that even has a video proof of McCain in his collaboration, just on your say so, right ? In their current meltdown, liberals are losing it entirely. :spinner:Also, I wouldn't exactly call McCain a "hero" for dropping bombs on people who never attacked the US, never threatened us, and never even spoke an unkind word to us. I think the whole Vietnam war was shameful.

First of all, in the same speech that you assinely refer to, Trump, elucidated that he wasn't talking about ALL Mexicans ,and said "Some are good people" But really all those who cross our border are NOT good people. They are criminals disrespecting our laws, and us (Trump was too kind)

And looking at it, statistics on rape in Mexico are stunted due to political corruption, rampant in the train wreck known as Mexico. All one has to do to see Mexico's pathological connection to rape and all sorts of sex deviance, is look at their sex segregated buses in Mexico City. Or all the Mexican illegals in prison for rape, in the US.

As for the so often little scam that Democrats are so fond of, referring to Trump's use of the word "thousands", that is just a metaphor, and a very common one. Ho hum. See Post # 99.

And yes, Trump mocked someone who has a disability. But he didn't mock Kovaleski's disability (as Hillary deceitfully claimed in her campaign TV ads, and some Democrats are doing right now in the Florida governor primary) He mocked Kovaleski for LYING about his Sept. 2001 Washington Post article, and claiming to not remember it (which is what Trump said). And that mocking was justified for one reason. Because Kovaleski WAS LYING, and when he got mocked for it, he DESERVED it.
 
Last edited:
You make an excellent point. Any insult that Trump or his supporters want to lodge at Omarosa is an indictment of Trump's judgment. As Trump chose her.

If Trump is so incompetent to hire a 'liar' and a 'dog' to be a top adviser, then clearly his judgment needs to be questioned.
Is he supposed to be 100% PERFECT. Can you name a single president that ever was ? :rolleyes: Maybe some of the reason this wart got into the White House, was from pressure from the left, (to hire minorities)
 
This will be brief. If Amarosa heard Trump use the N word, and that understandably would have disturbed her, then why did she hang around after that so long ? Just for the money ? Doesn't seem logical. If she would have left on her own accord, she would have had great esteem from her former job, and could have had her choice of high-paying jobs, galore.

So now, having been fired instead, she is badmarked, and is left with little more than making money from writing a book - which would sell only if something sensational were attached to it. Like accusing the president of the United States of being a racist. I wouldn't pay 10 cents for this woman's book.

Maybe she can rent a cart and sell peanuts.

Trump brought her to Washington. So much for his judgement. She learned her lessons very well from Trump. Trump has 0 credibility.
Trump paid her $180,000 of our tax dollars

Some judgement
 
Kovaleski was attacked because he refused to support Trumps lie about seeing thousands of Muslims dancing in NJ on 9-11
FALSE! HA HA. The word "thousands" is perhaps the most commonly used metaphor in the English language. "Oh, I got thousands of phone calls this morning." or "Oh they've got thousands of guitars in that store" (when actually they have about 80)

BULLSHIT. He repeatedly emphasized not just "thousands" but "thousands and thousands" and clearly he was not joking. PLUS he claimed to have watched it on TV, which absolutely DID NOT HAPPEN, since no such "thousands" happened. 9/11 was the most video-documented event in world history. There is *ZERO* footage of any such thing.

YOU son are wallowing in self-delusion. On what fucking planet does "three" --- and even that's being generous, allowing a report that was *NEVER* on anybody's TV ---- become "thousands and thousands" and get magically mushroomed into TV footage that had never in the history of earth existed?

More disturbingly, exactly how mentally ill do you have to be to be CONFRONTED with these realities yet STILL refuse to accept them? That's total and complete shutdown of reality.

THAT's some fucked-up shit.
 
The only reason Amarosa got the job was because Trump was accused of being a racist

No other President required an “African American Outreach Representative”
no other president ever had to follow up a black president either. there could be a lot of reasons for this - and yes many not good for trump or maybe just a "look". but that's certainly not all the reasons this happened; ie - bad trump.

She was hired as a token so that Trump could point to her and say....see? I’m not racist, I have a black woman working for me

Condoleza Rice would have been a better pick
So your thoughts are that if you are a white president from here on out, then you should steer clear of anyone black being brought into the campaign or taken to the people's house because there will be Hell to pay ???

You all applied this same standard or thought process when John MCcain tried to make Sarah Palin his vice president. Y'all sicked Katie Kurick on her because y'all figured that MCcain chose her as a token to satisfy the gender side of things.
 
Hey, y'all heard "rapists" and "banning Muslims" and "blood" and "I like people who weren't captured" and "thousands dancing on rooftops" and watched gyrations mocking a congenital disability -- why have y'all hung around so long?

Exactly. Makes no sense.

But hey, you're right. That was indeed brief.
We've hung around because unlike you, who falls for media scam talk on those things, we know the truth behind them.

We know that Trump was correct that McCain WAS NOT a war hero. He was a collaborator with the North Vietnamese, earning the nickname "Songbird" for all the military information he passed on to them.


:laugh2: I understand he disclosed the names of the Pittsburgh Steelers offensive line. I bet that completely threw off that week's NFL betting in Hanoi.



"Right Wing News" huh.:party:


We know that, in his famous "When Mexico sends us" speech, Trump mentioned more than Mexicans. In his very next 2 sentences, he said "And it's coming from more than Mexico. It's coming from all over South & Latin America, and it's coming probably from the Middle East." And yes, he was talking about "rapists".
But Trump didn't say ALL the immigrants were rapists. He focused his statement by saying >> "And some, I assume are good people" But of course the media, anxious to disparage Trump, rarely ever mention that part. Instead they, and leftist blabbermouths, change the narrative to make it appear that Trump talked about ALL Mexicans (clearly not the case)

But even if Trump had been talking about all of Latin America and the Middle East, and we could throw in India as well, he would have been right, if his point was that rape, in these 3rd world areas is commonly more accepted by men than it is in the US, and is far more prevalent.


This is a well known fact outside the US, where populations are not subject to media censorship of rape by non-whites, as it is in the US. According to Professor Carlos Javier Echarri Ca'novas of El Colegio de Mexico, a professor of demography who studies violence against women: "The fact is that the rape rate in Mexico is higher than in India." While Mexican statistics do indicate this, the rape rate is Mexico is likely far higher than the government reports. Reports of rape in 3rd world countries are hampered by corruption, and a cultural willingness to ignore violence considered “normal”.

Women Alert to Travel’s Darker Side

In a report from the InterAmerican Children's Institute, they explained that Latin America is second only to Asia in sexual exploitation of women and children, because sex abuse is "ingrained into the minds of the people." Women and children are "seen as objects instead of human beings with rights and freedoms."


http://www.ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/Regional CSEC Overview_Latin America (English).pdf

Some of those things you said are true. Mexicans by and large, relative to Americans, ARE "rapists", and ARE symptomatic of sexual abuse, more so than Americans. Think Mexican men are about the same as Americans when it comes to sex abuse of women ? Guess again. Things are so bad in the 3rd world (including Mexico), that authorities have had to segregate buses by sex, to keep men from groping women.

Mexico City Rolls Out Sex-Segregated Buses
iu


As for your disingenuous (to say the least) comment about "mocking a congenital disability", you know damn well that's not true, since I corrected you on that just a few days ago, and you have thus have no excuse to be still posting the false Hillary lie, when you now know the correct truth. For anybody else who still doesn't know, here it is >>

NO, here YOU ARE trying to cover for lying Serge Kovaleski, lying Hillary Clinton, lying Democrats running TV ads and pretending that Trump was mocking Kovaleski's disability. Even some Democrat posters in this forum have used the Kovaleski scam, some even as a signature, but they eventually removed it.

So, here are Kovaleski's words from his September 18, 2001 article in the Washington Post, exactly as what Trump said he said. And these are exactly the words Kovaleski wouldn't admit he said/wrote (note: none of this had anything to do with any quantity words like hundreds or thousands), which prompted Trump to mock him for that disingenuous denial >>>

"In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners' plowing into the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river."

Northern New Jersey Draws Probers' Eyes

PS - This article was also written by Fredrick Kunkle, but Kunkle never denied he had written the part about "number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops", so he didn't get mocked by Trump for it. Only Kovalelski did.

Yes, Kovaleski got mocked by Trump, not about any disability, but because Kovalseski lied about what he wrote. He got mocked by Trump, because he DESERVED to get mocked.

ROLL 'EM.



ROLL 'EM AGAIN



RUMP is the one who LIED, fucking moron. Neither Kovaleski, nor ANYBODY ELSE, *EVER* claimed there were "thousands and thousands", **NOR** was there any such TV footage.

He MADE THAT SHIT UP. Don't you GET that? And you bought it hook, line and stinker.

Go ahead and prove that wrong. Show the class this footage of "thousands and thousands dancing on rooftops". FIND the class a contemporary story from anywhere claiming that. Kovaleski said "I certainly don't remember 'thousands' or even hundreds'.

See the words "a number of" in your own quote? How many people is "a number of"? Whatever you want to make it?

Got your 'number' right here pal ---- it is... drum roll please..... THREE.

>> ...She grabbed her binoculars and watched the destruction unfolding in lower Manhattan. But as she watched the disaster, something else caught her eye.

Maria says she saw three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. "They seemed to be taking a movie," Maria said.

The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck Maria were the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange," she said.

She found the behavior so suspicious that she wrote down the license plate number of the van and called the police. Before long, the FBI was also on the scene, and a statewide bulletin was issued on the van.

The plate number was traced to a van owned by a company called Urban Moving. Around 4 p.m. on Sept. 11, the van was spotted on a service road off Route 3, near New Jersey's Giants Stadium. A police officer pulled the van over, finding five men, between 22 and 27 years old, in the vehicle. The men were taken out of the van at gunpoint and handcuffed by police.

The arresting officers said they saw a lot that aroused their suspicion about the men. One of the passengers had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock. Another was carrying two foreign passports. A box cutter was found in the van. But perhaps the biggest surprise for the officers came when the five men identified themselves as Israeli citizens.

‘We Are Not Your Problem’

According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan "during the incident" — referring to the World Trade Center attack. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem." The other passengers were his brother Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. <<​

****ALL**** of which comports with Kovaleski's story, AND his recollection, and NONE of which supports Rump and his Rumpoid fantasies he makes up as red meat because he doesn't have Rump Steaks any more.

Got that, stupid? THREE Israelis on the roof of a van got magically transmogrified into "thousands and thousands" and somehow made into something Rump could have "watched on TV" even though no such video was ever made. Brian Williams never even got close to this level.

THREE was the number of people on the van, and the number on the van was THREE. FIVE total were in the van. "THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS" IS RIGHT OUT. It's fucking BULLSHIT. It's FAKE NEWS.

Matter of fact you can see these very THREE (3, being the third number) people in this video at the end, being interviewed on Israeli TV:



Go find that evidence to white-knight for your Agent Orange con artist and then when you can't do it be sure to waddle back in and ADMIT you were taken in by a fucking CON ARTIST. ***THAT*** is why he stood in front of an audience and mocked a congenital disability --- because his target WOULDN'T LIE for him.

And why the fuck should he? What, is dishonesty a virtue with you jackals now?

Holy SHIT you're fucking dense.

You know, if you crazies would let the man do his job instead of steady crying about all the entrapments that you all have set for him to trip on, then the working class people could get back to the business of growing this nation, securing this nation, and growing the nations economy for the betterment of all in this nation.

What you crazies are doing isn't working, and it will never work... It is delaying the good that can come to all, but you all with your crazy ace ways don't give a crapola about that, so keep hammering away as you get less and less popular with your bullcrap.
 
Kovaleski was attacked because he refused to support Trumps lie about seeing thousands of Muslims dancing in NJ on 9-11
FALSE! HA HA. The word "thousands" is perhaps the most commonly used metaphor in the English language. "Oh, I got thousands of phone calls this morning." or "Oh they've got thousands of guitars in that store" (when actually they have about 80)

BULLSHIT. He repeatedly emphasized not just "thousands" but "thousands and thousands" and clearly he was not joking. PLUS he claimed to have watched it on TV, which absolutely DID NOT HAPPEN, since no such "thousands" happened. 9/11 was the most video-documented event in world history. There is *ZERO* footage of any such thing.

YOU son are wallowing in self-delusion. On what fucking planet does "three" --- and even that's being generous, allowing a report that was *NEVER* on anybody's TV ---- become "thousands and thousands" and get magically mushroomed into TV footage that had never in the history of earth existed?

More disturbingly, exactly how mentally ill do you have to be to be CONFRONTED with these realities yet STILL refuse to accept them? That's total and complete shutdown of reality.

THAT's some fucked-up shit.
This is exactly the craziness and blind zeal that I referred to in my new thread >> Liberals Don't Realize How Crazy They Are

As for the people cheering on rooftops, of course there were, and there's a list of clearly credible confirmations, but once again, liberals will say anything to blindly push their agenda, and it is this nuttiness, that prevents the American people from supporting them, despite the fact that they do have some good ideas that do deserve support.

And then these good ideas get swept aside, which shouldn't be the case.
 
Kovaleski was attacked because he refused to support Trumps lie about seeing thousands of Muslims dancing in NJ on 9-11
FALSE! HA HA. The word "thousands" is perhaps the most commonly used metaphor in the English language. "Oh, I got thousands of phone calls this morning." or "Oh they've got thousands of guitars in that store" (when actually they have about 80)

BULLSHIT. He repeatedly emphasized not just "thousands" but "thousands and thousands" and clearly he was not joking. PLUS he claimed to have watched it on TV, which absolutely DID NOT HAPPEN, since no such "thousands" happened. 9/11 was the most video-documented event in world history. There is *ZERO* footage of any such thing.

YOU son are wallowing in self-delusion. On what fucking planet does "three" --- and even that's being generous, allowing a report that was *NEVER* on anybody's TV ---- become "thousands and thousands" and get magically mushroomed into TV footage that had never in the history of earth existed?

More disturbingly, exactly how mentally ill do you have to be to be CONFRONTED with these realities yet STILL refuse to accept them? That's total and complete shutdown of reality.

THAT's some fucked-up shit.
This is exactly the craziness and blind zeal that I referred to in my new thread >> Liberals Don't Realize How Crazy They Are

As for the people cheering on rooftops, of course there were, and there's a list of clearly credible confirmations, but once again, liberals will say anything to blindly push their agenda, and it is this nuttiness, that prevents the American people from supporting them, despite the fact that they do have some good ideas that do deserve support.

And then these good ideas get swept aside, which shouldn't be the case.

I've just been there. That thread is supposed to be about self-delusion and denying reality?

Question goes double then.
 
Why would anyone select someone for an important position whose only qualification was being on a reality TV show


Wait........we elected Trump
 

Forum List

Back
Top