All Threads That Are Based Off of Certain Sites...

Anyone remember "Prop or Not?"

Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story
Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story

". . . . As journalist Robert Parry wrote in October 2016, the propaganda campaign in favor of military confrontation with Russia was driven by “a consensus among the major think tanks of Official Washington, where there is near universal support for Hillary Clinton, not because they all particularly like her, but because she has signaled a return to neocon/liberal-hawk strategies.”


The people who were lining up to take senior positions in a Clinton White House believed that President Obama had been too timid in stressing the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the Middle East, and it was time for a more hawkish approach, as embodied by Clinton.


Parry goes on to say that at the forefront of this propaganda campaign was the Atlantic Council, a think tank associated with NATO. Their main goal was “a major confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia,” Parry warned.


So, to make sense of all this, most of the people listed would have held cabinet positions in a Hillary Clinton presidency. If the Interpreter is a project of RFE/RL then the decision to go ahead with PropOrNot would have to go across their desk. That would include, possibly, then Secretary of State, John Kerry.


The unasked question of why would a U.S. Government Agency do this needs to be addressed. All the people listed above were actively working for Clinton to get her elected and throw Donald Trump’s campaign off the rails.


After the election, they were going to take care of Clinton’s “deplorables” by dissecting alternative media. I wrote about this before the election and I warned several major new sites what they could expect. I was right on the money. After she lost, it was already in motion. The deplorable media didn’t fall into a particular political pattern other than they did not promote Hillary Clinton.


The purpose of PropOrNot has been to trick people into demanding that freedom of speech be rolled back. This was/is to be done by destroying fact-based media. If you read further, the entire plan is laid out starting from 2015 when it started coming together.


These people want reality shaped on what the perceived majority (louder) group believes to be true, regardless of what the facts are. Perception based reality is only a Facebook like away from killing one person or elevating another to hero status regardless of what they have done. . . . "



IOW, the need to censor alternative narratives from those other than the one approved by ruling class journalists, is a campaign to control thoughts and minds to push forward the agenda of Washington think tanks and the Federal bureaucracy, AKA, the welfare/warfare Deep State.

Heaven forbid Americans actually choose what is best for them instead of the corporate interests and monied interests that enslave them.

The only conspiracy that Lewdog would have pushed forward is the conspiracy to keep folks from having the ability to be free thinkers.
 
Bless your heart. I know you mean well.

I know more than you.......like by a factor of a thousand....but that really isn't saying much since you know so little, bless your heart. (snicker)


You're just a peach! Your momma must be proud.


That's against the rules ..report

Bless your little heart too.


Running out of ammo in your pathetic little world?

Nope. It's pretty simple. Steve McRacist post nothing but fake news from the same sites every day in the Politics forum. That's not the proper place for them.

I have to keep reminding you of this because you have such a shitty memory.
 
Bless your heart. I know you mean well.

I know more than you.......like by a factor of a thousand....but that really isn't saying much since you know so little, bless your heart. (snicker)


You're just a peach! Your momma must be proud.


That's against the rules ..report

Bless your little heart too.


Running out of ammo in your pathetic little world?

Lewd-dog is a joke in search of a punchline. He has a double digit IQ in the high 80's to low 90's. Hell, I am impressed that he figured out how to navigate this website....it had to be taxing to him.
 
Bless your little heart. If only the mods actually did enforce moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists posts to the correct section of the forum, you still wouldn't leave. Just like the goodbye thread you started only to never leave. You mean well, I'm sure you do.

:safetocomeoutff:

moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...


You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?
 
Anyone remember "Prop or Not?"

Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story
Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story

". . . . As journalist Robert Parry wrote in October 2016, the propaganda campaign in favor of military confrontation with Russia was driven by “a consensus among the major think tanks of Official Washington, where there is near universal support for Hillary Clinton, not because they all particularly like her, but because she has signaled a return to neocon/liberal-hawk strategies.”


The people who were lining up to take senior positions in a Clinton White House believed that President Obama had been too timid in stressing the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the Middle East, and it was time for a more hawkish approach, as embodied by Clinton.


Parry goes on to say that at the forefront of this propaganda campaign was the Atlantic Council, a think tank associated with NATO. Their main goal was “a major confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia,” Parry warned.


So, to make sense of all this, most of the people listed would have held cabinet positions in a Hillary Clinton presidency. If the Interpreter is a project of RFE/RL then the decision to go ahead with PropOrNot would have to go across their desk. That would include, possibly, then Secretary of State, John Kerry.


The unasked question of why would a U.S. Government Agency do this needs to be addressed. All the people listed above were actively working for Clinton to get her elected and throw Donald Trump’s campaign off the rails.


After the election, they were going to take care of Clinton’s “deplorables” by dissecting alternative media. I wrote about this before the election and I warned several major new sites what they could expect. I was right on the money. After she lost, it was already in motion. The deplorable media didn’t fall into a particular political pattern other than they did not promote Hillary Clinton.


The purpose of PropOrNot has been to trick people into demanding that freedom of speech be rolled back. This was/is to be done by destroying fact-based media. If you read further, the entire plan is laid out starting from 2015 when it started coming together.


These people want reality shaped on what the perceived majority (louder) group believes to be true, regardless of what the facts are. Perception based reality is only a Facebook like away from killing one person or elevating another to hero status regardless of what they have done. . . . "



IOW, the need to censor alternative narratives from those other than the one approved by ruling class journalists, is a campaign to control thoughts and minds to push forward the agenda of Washington think tanks and the Federal bureaucracy, AKA, the welfare/warfare Deep State.

Heaven forbid Americans actually choose what is best for them instead of the corporate interests and monied interests that enslave them.

The only conspiracy that Lewdog would have pushed forward is the conspiracy to keep folks from having the ability to be free thinkers.


I cannot add a thing to this, MisterBeale.........relevant and "dead on" as all your posts are.
 
The day that the moderators of this forum takes seriously the suggestions of someone with such a limited intellect (such as yourself) with no critical thinking skills? Well, that's the day that I vacate this site. Shall I regale you with the examples of CNN being busted for staging news events using blue screens as if they were on site?

Bless your little heart. If only the mods actually did enforce moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists posts to the correct section of the forum, you still wouldn't leave. Just like the goodbye thread you started only to never leave. You mean well, I'm sure you do.

:safetocomeoutff:

moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...

Steve McRacist only posts from 2-3 sites.

So are you going to pick up the bet or not? Or just admit you are wrong?

So the fuck what? No one is twisting your flabby arm and making you read what he posts..........or are they? You might need to use your (snicker) "connections" within the law enforcement community and file charges, ya dumb, fat fuck.


Bless your heart. I know you mean well.


^^^
Lewdog



hqdefault.jpg
 
moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...


You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...
 
You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..
 
You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...

So?????? What news sources do YOU believe should only be allowed to be posted on "Zone 2 Politics"???????
 
Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...
 
Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..


Only a libtard like you would attack some ones mom and then claim a victim..
 
Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


Yes it is.

That's personal
 
Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


I told you I pay attention.
 
Anyone remember "Prop or Not?"

Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story
Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story

". . . . As journalist Robert Parry wrote in October 2016, the propaganda campaign in favor of military confrontation with Russia was driven by “a consensus among the major think tanks of Official Washington, where there is near universal support for Hillary Clinton, not because they all particularly like her, but because she has signaled a return to neocon/liberal-hawk strategies.”


The people who were lining up to take senior positions in a Clinton White House believed that President Obama had been too timid in stressing the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the Middle East, and it was time for a more hawkish approach, as embodied by Clinton.


Parry goes on to say that at the forefront of this propaganda campaign was the Atlantic Council, a think tank associated with NATO. Their main goal was “a major confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia,” Parry warned.


So, to make sense of all this, most of the people listed would have held cabinet positions in a Hillary Clinton presidency. If the Interpreter is a project of RFE/RL then the decision to go ahead with PropOrNot would have to go across their desk. That would include, possibly, then Secretary of State, John Kerry.


The unasked question of why would a U.S. Government Agency do this needs to be addressed. All the people listed above were actively working for Clinton to get her elected and throw Donald Trump’s campaign off the rails.


After the election, they were going to take care of Clinton’s “deplorables” by dissecting alternative media. I wrote about this before the election and I warned several major new sites what they could expect. I was right on the money. After she lost, it was already in motion. The deplorable media didn’t fall into a particular political pattern other than they did not promote Hillary Clinton.


The purpose of PropOrNot has been to trick people into demanding that freedom of speech be rolled back. This was/is to be done by destroying fact-based media. If you read further, the entire plan is laid out starting from 2015 when it started coming together.


These people want reality shaped on what the perceived majority (louder) group believes to be true, regardless of what the facts are. Perception based reality is only a Facebook like away from killing one person or elevating another to hero status regardless of what they have done. . . . "



IOW, the need to censor alternative narratives from those other than the one approved by ruling class journalists, is a campaign to control thoughts and minds to push forward the agenda of Washington think tanks and the Federal bureaucracy, AKA, the welfare/warfare Deep State.

Heaven forbid Americans actually choose what is best for them instead of the corporate interests and monied interests that enslave them.

The only conspiracy that Lewdog would have pushed forward is the conspiracy to keep folks from having the ability to be free thinkers.


I cannot add a thing to this, MisterBeale.........relevant and "dead on" as all your posts are.
And the thing is, Robert Perry was a LIBERAL, and these folks sometimes won't even listen to him.

Unfortunately, he just died.

I wonder if "they" did him in for his tireless crusade. lol :tinfoil:

Seriously though, great man, tragic loss.
 
Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


Yes it is.

That's personal

No, it is called a Colloquialism. Just like Bless your heart.
 
You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...
Yes, I know.

Cite for me EXACTLY, which zone two rule is broken by using these sources.
 
Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


I told you I pay attention.


No, you don't, otherwise you wouldn't have gotten me confused with Odium. He's the one that got hurt at work and let's wife be the bread winner.

:abgg2q.jpg:

I go to grad school full-time and work at the college part-time.
 
What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


Yes it is.

That's personal

No, it is called a Colloquialism. Just like Bless your heart.


Back tracking now are we?

You just did a major major rule violation in zone 2...
 
Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.


Your having a hissy fit over nonsense .


Why?

Hissy fit? Asking for the rules to be enforced is a hissy fit?

What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...
Yes, I know.

Cite for me EXACTLY, which zone two rule is broken by using these sources.

flacaltenn had posted at one point that threads started in Zone 2 Politics must meet a requirement of having a proper source.
 
What rule exactly?

Zone 2 Politics have requirements for threads there...


You already blew it out of the water by attacking a posters mom..

Saying someone's mom must be proud of them is not attacking their mom...


I told you I pay attention.


No, you don't, otherwise you wouldn't have gotten me confused with Odium. He's the one that got hurt at work and let's wife be the bread winner.

:abgg2q.jpg:

I go to grad school full-time and work at the college part-time.

Say what?,?????


What?,,,?,?


What?,????


What???
 

Forum List

Back
Top