Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ALL RISE! Class is in Session!- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,999
- 34,200
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #22
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm
UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(b) Employment agency practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(c) Labor organization practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for a labor organization-
(1) to exclude or to expel from its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify its membership or applicants for membership, or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any individual, in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or would limit such employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee or as an applicant for employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an individual in violation of this section.
(d) Training programs
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.
(e) Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, (1) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise, and (2) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.
(f) Members of Communist Party or Communist-action or Communist-front organizations
As used in this subchapter, the phrase “unlawful employment practice” shall not be deemed to include any action or measure taken by an employer, labor organization, joint labor management committee, or employment agency with respect to an individual who is a member of the Communist Party of the United States or of any other organization required to register as a Communist-action or Communist-front organization by final order of the Subversive Activities Control Board pursuant to the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950 [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.].
(g) National security
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire and employ any individual for any position, for an employer to discharge any individual from any position, or for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer any individual for employment in any position, or for a labor organization to fail or refuse to refer any individual for employment in any position, if-
(1) the occupancy of such position, or access to the premises in or upon which any part of the duties of such position is performed or is to be performed, is subject to any requirement imposed in the interest of the national security of the United States under any security program in effect pursuant to or administered under any statute of the United States or any Executive order of the President; and
(2) such individual has not fulfilled or has ceased to fulfill that requirement.
(h) Seniority or merit system; quantity or quality of production; ability tests; compensation based on sex and authorized by minimum wage provisions
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to apply different standards of compensation, or different terms, conditions, or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority or merit system, or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production or to employees who work in different locations, provided that such differences are not the result of an intention to discriminate because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, nor shall it be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to give and to act upon the results of any professionally developed ability test provided that such test, its administration or action upon the results is not designed, intended or used to discriminate because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
These things were made necessary because everything in color was used by whites to deny people of color work, fair pay and promotions. Nothing in these provisions allows preferences to any particular race or denies another of opportunities. Therefore if you are against this you are for the racially discriminatory practices it was designed to stop as posted in color.
www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm
UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(b) Employment agency practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(c) Labor organization practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for a labor organization-
(1) to exclude or to expel from its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify its membership or applicants for membership, or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any individual, in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or would limit such employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee or as an applicant for employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an individual in violation of this section.
(d) Training programs
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.
(e) Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, (1) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise, and (2) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.
(f) Members of Communist Party or Communist-action or Communist-front organizations
As used in this subchapter, the phrase “unlawful employment practice” shall not be deemed to include any action or measure taken by an employer, labor organization, joint labor management committee, or employment agency with respect to an individual who is a member of the Communist Party of the United States or of any other organization required to register as a Communist-action or Communist-front organization by final order of the Subversive Activities Control Board pursuant to the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950 [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.].
(g) National security
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire and employ any individual for any position, for an employer to discharge any individual from any position, or for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer any individual for employment in any position, or for a labor organization to fail or refuse to refer any individual for employment in any position, if-
(1) the occupancy of such position, or access to the premises in or upon which any part of the duties of such position is performed or is to be performed, is subject to any requirement imposed in the interest of the national security of the United States under any security program in effect pursuant to or administered under any statute of the United States or any Executive order of the President; and
(2) such individual has not fulfilled or has ceased to fulfill that requirement.
(h) Seniority or merit system; quantity or quality of production; ability tests; compensation based on sex and authorized by minimum wage provisions
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to apply different standards of compensation, or different terms, conditions, or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority or merit system, or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production or to employees who work in different locations, provided that such differences are not the result of an intention to discriminate because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, nor shall it be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to give and to act upon the results of any professionally developed ability test provided that such test, its administration or action upon the results is not designed, intended or used to discriminate because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
These things were made necessary because everything in color was used by whites to deny people of color work, fair pay and promotions. Nothing in these provisions allows preferences to any particular race or denies another of opportunities. Therefore if you are against this you are for the racially discriminatory practices it was designed to stop as posted in color.
- Sep 27, 2012
- 91,976
- 53,465
- 2,605
Poor baby needs the oppressive govt to keep you from being suppressed by the citizenry.I really don't think whites can say that. But we will cling to the law.
You must one miserable sob ey?
nope,you call anything you dont like....racism....not with you....say something you dont like....you will say its racist...to you everything seems to be racist......Good grief...another racist thread
So now talking about the law pertaining to civil rights is racist. OK.
Another rightard snowflake.
No only racism seems racist. Gaslighting doesn't work.
Nope, I call racism when it's racism.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,999
- 34,200
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #25
nope,you call anything you dont like....racism....not with you....say something you dont like....you will say its racist...to you everything seems to be racist......So now talking about the law pertaining to civil rights is racist. OK.
Another rightard snowflake.
No only racism seems racist. Gaslighting doesn't work.
Nope, I call racism when it's racism.
True, I don't like racism. Now If you can't discuss the law leave.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,999
- 34,200
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #26
Poor baby needs the oppressive govt to keep you from being suppressed by the citizenry.I really don't think whites can say that. But we will cling to the law.
You must one miserable sob ey?
Less miserable than you apparently. Because your statement is stupid. Laws exist for a reason.
Yup, some of that, in part, hangs on the walls of break rooms
old, tattered news IM2
what's hot right now is all the sexual harrassment policies , ask any human resource employee
oh, did i say hot, i meant like hot as an iron.....stove.....uhm....radiator
oh dear!
~S~
Since we still have whites in here crying about being racially discriminated that's what we will discuss. Sexual harassment has always been "hot." There is no such thing as the hot discrimination of the moment.
gender discrimination by far and large, outshines anything rasict you could possibly bring to the table
the fact is, humaity has oppressed women since adam & eve got da boot outta the garden of eden , ecompassing every race on this rock
which makes you and your rascial concerns a bit player at best IM2
You don't get to minimize racism. Especially when white women are racists.
what about really short women?
~S~
- Sep 27, 2012
- 91,976
- 53,465
- 2,605
Laws exist for a reason to bedwetting statists.Poor baby needs the oppressive govt to keep you from being suppressed by the citizenry.I really don't think whites can say that. But we will cling to the law.
You must one miserable sob ey?
Less miserable than you apparently. Because your statement is stupid. Laws exist for a reason.
not what i was talking about,but then thats typical for you......and why dont you make me leave chump........nope,you call anything you dont like....racism....not with you....say something you dont like....you will say its racist...to you everything seems to be racist......
No only racism seems racist. Gaslighting doesn't work.
Nope, I call racism when it's racism.
True, I don't like racism. Now If you can't discuss the law leave.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not ‘racist.’
It has been upheld as Constitutional by the Supreme Court (Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)).
Conservatives excel at being stupid and ridiculous.
It has been upheld as Constitutional by the Supreme Court (Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)).
Conservatives excel at being stupid and ridiculous.
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,075
- 25,132
- 2,445
Titles II and VII of the Civil Rights Act need to be ditched. Those two, irrelevant of whatever good intention they served at the time, really trampled all over property rights. The right to property, no matter how much one hates the ideology of a property owner, must be respected if we're going to maintain a free society. Property rights are the very foundation for the Individual's rights to Life and Liberty themselves.
Last edited:
Intolerant
Diamond Member
- Sep 18, 2012
- 4,947
- 1,856
- 2,085
Too dense to comprehend.Yo! IM2 , I'll race you. Bwahahaha... get it?Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(j) Preferential treatment not to be granted on account of existing number or percentage imbalance
(in short - no quotas)
www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm
- Businesses with more than 15 employees are bound by this law.
- AA plans are required only if you have 50 or more employees or;
- 50,000 in government contracts.
It's time to learn the truth. Please understand that the word unlawful comes before much of what you are about to read. So most of what you guys have cried about has always been unlawful therefore it was never done. But you were told they were because you were race pimped.
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 36,057
- 46,056
- 2,915
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not ‘racist.’
It has been upheld as Constitutional by the Supreme Court (Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)).
Conservatives excel at being stupid and ridiculous.
It's 2018 and the Liberals still do not accept that everyone has equal Civil Rights.
They demand racial discrimination in employment and education
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,075
- 25,132
- 2,445
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not ‘racist.’
It has been upheld as Constitutional by the Supreme Court (Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)).
Conservatives excel at being stupid and ridiculous.
Just because some people on the Supreme Court declare something constitutional doesn't make it so. In fact, the SC has a dismal record with regard to protecting civil liberties against the unconstitutional excesses of Congress.
You're in dire need of reeducation. Respectfully. And I, for one, am offended that you have the stones to put the Bill of Rights next to your name on here. Your posting history demonstrates you to be a very, very, poor and incapable, unqualified, representative for it. Disgraceful, even.
Last edited:
- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,999
- 34,200
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #36
Titles II and VII of the Civil Rights Act need to be ditched. Those two, irrelevant of whatever good intention they served at the time, really trampled all over property rights. The right to property, no matter how much one hates the ideology of a property owner, must be respected if we're going to maintain a free society. Property rights are the very foundation for the Individual's rights to Life and Liberty themselves.
Untrue. Property rights were not trampled by these laws.
- Aug 8, 2016
- 26,075
- 25,132
- 2,445
Untrue. Property rights were not trampled by these laws.
Sure, they were.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,999
- 34,200
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #38
Untrue. Property rights were not trampled by these laws.
Sure, they were.
Present evidence. Because before these laws were made some of us had little or no property rights.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 423
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 295
- Views
- 7K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 60
- Views
- 551
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 39
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-