Zone1 The White Affirmative Action Program

You need to stop flappin' those gums as if you've got something intelligent to say.

The work I've done to get to the point I'm at would kill someone like you. You're petrified of hard work. We know this because you're always here bitching about what you don't have.

Work for what you want. Otherwise, you'll have everything you deserve from a life rooted in laziness and jealousy...
Agree. Blaming others for one’s own failures is something a child does.

The blacks still in poverty can move from it simply by not having all these kids out of wedlock, and getting some post-high school training (which would be paid for by Pell Grants). Anything else is an excuse, and it’s getting old.
 
This thread is about WHITE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. And everything I have shown happened. The country has been helping white women who had children from deadbeat white men since 1910. Your rant attacking me personally has nothing to do with the thread topic nor does your "I have a black friend" example. Now, I don't give a damn what Mike has done and the opinion about hard work coming from someone like you is a joke. You know nothing about that, and you caught a case of booty pain when it was shown just how much whites have been given. That's your problem pod-nuh, because it's documented fact.
This isn’t 1910, you fail to show any current benefits only given to whites.
 
Weak.

America was "founded in 1776 but you still talk about returning to the intent of people who lived in 1776. Furthermore the New Deal and things that happened after WW2 created the wealth that whites have today.
So why did your OP begin with laws from 1618 before the US was created??? No Blacks working today were affected by any white affirmative action law in you posted in your OP.

Blacks given everything continue to steal wealth from everyone!
FED criminal.png
 
Last edited:
So why did your OP begin with laws from 1618 before the US was created??? No Blacks working today were affected by any white affirmative action law in you posted in your OP.

Blacks given everything continue to steal wealth from everyone!
View attachment 711738
This thread is not about blacks. It is about how long WHITES have been given what you claim AA is. That's 404 years so far.
 
So why did your OP begin with laws from 1618 before the US was created??? No Blacks working today were affected by any white affirmative action law in you posted in your OP.

Blacks given everything continue to steal wealth from everyone!
View attachment 711738
OP had to go back centuries because there is no systemic racism against blacks today. Instead, we have everything from the President of the United States announcing, beforehand, that no whites would be considered for VP or SCOTUS nominee - and look at the idiot we ended up with (for VP; SCOTUS one still undetermined) - to blacks with far inferior academics being admitted to prestigious programs over whites with far superior metrics sent packing.

In fact, the pressure to elevate blacks above whites is seen in auto-fill when Black is capitalized, giving them an honorific, and lower-casing white. The underlying message is quite obvious.
 
This thread is not about blacks. It is about how long WHITES have been given what you claim AA is. That's 404 years so far.
You blacks have been given free education, jobs, housing, food, energy & everything else since 1964 yet you continue to lie, steal, cheat, murder & cant do math. 1964 - 1618 = 346 years, not 404.

Mound Bayou, Mississippi was founded as free 100% black town in 1887. Today it's population is still 99.7% black & has a 46% poverty rate.

The USA working age population never experienced any negative black discrimination in their entire lifetime. Blacks have been carried on the backs of all US white slaves forced to support them.
 
Last edited:
White have received Affirmative Action since America has been a colony. Uneducated white peasants were given jobs and citizenship over Africans who were rulers of kingdoms. All kinds of standards have been lowered or altered for whites to get to where they are today.

In 1618, the Virginia colony passed "the Great Charter of privileges, orders, and laws." Among these laws was a provision that any person who settled in Virginia or paid for the transportation of another person to settle in Virginia would get fifty acres of land per person. “The right to receive fifty acres per person, or per head, was called a headright.” It got even better for colonists as those who “imported” slaves also got fifty acres per slave. The practice was continued by the government of Virginia, for 161 years, ending in 1779. Headrights were not only limited to Virginia. The headright system was used in all the original thirteen colonies. Headrights were the first of many government handouts of free stuff or guarantees providing whites with economic development assistance.

It continued with this:

The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

And with this:

The Naturalization Act of 1790 states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as they lived in the United States for at least two years and in the state where the application was filed for at least one year. This law allowed “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.” Please notice the first seven words. Only whites were entitled to be citizens of this country.

And with this:

One of the greatest miscarriages of justice in this nation’s history was a direct rebuttal to the claim that all men are created equal called Dred Scott v. Sandford. I am not going into all the particulars of this case. The court’s opinion says all you need to know. “A black man has no rights a white man is bound to respect.” The result of Dred Scott v. Sandford was that whites were given rights and status blacks were denied.Or- Affirmative Action.

And with this:

Anti-literacy Laws in the United States Once Prevented Blacks from Getting an Education

(NO OTHER RACE WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO READ)

Passed in 1862, the Homestead Acts gave away 246 million acres of land. To qualify for Homestead land, a person had to be a citizen of the United States, and blacks were not given citizenship until 1866.


And this:

"After the Civil War ended in 1865, some states passed black codes that severely limited the rights of Black people, many of whom had been enslaved. These codes limited what jobs African Americans could hold, and their ability to leave a job once hired. Some states also restricted the kind of property Black people could own. The Reconstruction Act of 1867 weakened the effect of the Black codes by requiring all states to uphold equal protection under the 14th Amendment, particularly by enabling Black men to vote. (U.S. law prevented women of any race from voting in federal elections until 1920.)

During Reconstruction, many Black men participated in politics by voting and by holding office. Reconstruction officially ended in 1877, and southern states then enacted more discriminatory laws. Efforts to enforce white supremacy by legislation increased, and African Americans tried to assert their rights through legal challenges. However, this effort led to a disappointing result in 1896, when the Supreme Court ruled, in Plessy v. Ferguson, that so-called “separate but equal” facilities—including public transport and schools—were constitutional. From this time until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, discrimination and segregation were legal and enforceable."

July 9, 2018 was the 150th anniversary of the 14th Amendment, which purported to grant African Americans the rights and responsibilities of full citizenship, among other things. American history shows that people who are equal on paper can be unequal in practice—especially with regards to the right to bear arms.

On April 16, 1895, the United States Supreme Court rendered another one of the sorriest decisions in American history. It is known as Plessy vs. Ferguson. From this decision came the principle of separate but equal.


And this:

The National Housing Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934.29 This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The National Housing Act is the policy that may have had the most impact on wealth accumulation in modern America.

Between 1934 and 1968, the FHA implemented and put into practice a policy that still negatively impacts communities today.30 The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess home values in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices. It was done by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA established a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions.

Redlining was the name of that grading system. My point here is the FHA was a government agency whose policies specifically provided whites with opportunities to increase wealth through homeownership. The formation of the FHA and its guaranteed loan program only worked to increase white advantage.
“Of the $120 billion worth of new housing subsidized by the government between 1934 and 1962, less than 2 percent went to nonwhite families.”

"The racial-exclusion clauses in deeds were not only recommended by the federal government, but in some cases required as a condition of Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration subsidies for the creation of all-white suburbs, like Levittown in New York state. And federal and state courts, in violation of their constitutional obligations, enforced those deed clauses by ordering the eviction of African Americans who bought homes where the deeds barred them from doing so."

And this:

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children.Today, most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law excluded occupations mainly done by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two-thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. For years, most blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

And this:

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare, folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

And this:

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things, but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congress members, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

And this:

On June 22, 1944, President Roosevelt signed the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill.38 This law provided benefits for veterans returning from World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time, southern members of Congress fought the passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks.

Over one million returning black soldiers were unable to get GI benefits. My father was one of those soldiers.



Headrights, Headrights (VA-NOTES)

What was the Headright System? Headright System History & Significance | What was the Headright System? - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

Williams, T. (2000). The Homestead Act: A major asset-building policy in American history (CSD Working Paper No. 00-9). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development. Pg.11 The Homestead Act: A Major Asset-Building Policy in American History
Freedmen's Bureau Act, Freedmen's Bureau Act, March 3, 1865 | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

talkafricana.com


Anti-literacy Laws in the United States Once Prevented Blacks from Getting an Education - TalkAfricana


talkafricana.com

talkafricana.com

education.nationalgeographic.org


The Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws | National Geographic Society

After the United States Civil War, state governments that had been part of the Confederacy tried to limit the voting rights of Black citizens and prevent contact between Black and white citizens in public places.
education.nationalgeographic.org

education.nationalgeographic.org

www.topic.com


The Unequal History of African American Gun Rights

When it comes to firearms, some Americans are more equal than others.
www.topic.com

www.topic.com

James Chen, National Housing Act, Updated Sep 3, 2019, What Is the National Housing Act?

Alexis C. Madrigal, The Racist Housing Policy That Made Your Neighborhood, The Atlantic, May 22, 2014, The Racist Housing Policy That Made Your Neighborhood

www.businessinsider.com


Segregation has been embraced, mandated, and maintained in the United States by law and policy — here's how

A conversation with author Richard Rothstein on the laws and policies that prevent Black and white Americans from living in integrated neighborhoods.
www.businessinsider.com

www.businessinsider.com

PBS, Race-The Power of An Illusion, Uncle Sam Lends A Hand, Did the Government Racialize Housing and Wealth? RACE - The Power of an Illusion . Go Deeper | PBS

The Social Security Act of 1935, Social Security History

Larry DeWitt, The Decision to Exclude Agricultural and Domestic Workers from the 1935 Social Security Act, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2010

Brad Plumer, A second look at Social Security’s racist origins, Washington Post, June 3, 2013, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...cond-look-at-social-securitys-racist-origins/

Linda Gordon and Felice Batlan, The Legal History of the Aid to Dependent Children Program, Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History

Johnathan Grossman, Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage, U.S. Department of Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage | U.S. Department of Labor

Servicemen’s Readjustment Act (G.I. Bill), Servicemen's Readjustment Act (1944) Facts - G.I. Bill for Veterans

Erin Blakemore, How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans, How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans, June 21, 2019

Brandon Weber, How African American WWII Veterans Were Scorned By the G.I. Bill, The Progressive, November 10, 2017, How African American WWII Veterans Were Scorned By the G.I. Bill
Sally Kohn, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone, Time, JUNE 17, 2013, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone.

Fact Sheet: Affirmative Action and What It Means for Women, July 1, 2000, The National Womens Law Center, https://nwlc.org/resources/affirmative-action-and-what-it-means-women/

Tim Wise, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action, September 23, 1998, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action

Victoria M. Massie, White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents, White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents
It’s 2022, not 1618
 
This thread is not about blacks. It is about how long WHITES have been given what you claim AA is. That's 404 years so far.
Since, according to you, you are more successful than whites on these threads, you are the one who must have been given shit by the government or you would not be more successful.
 
Since, according to you, you are more successful than whites on these threads, you are the one who must have been given shit by the government or you would not be more successful.
Excellent point. In general, approximately two out of three black college students attending prestigious or even 2nd-tier institutions would NOT have been accepted had they been white, and one out of three blacks WOULD still have been accepted regardless of color based on their own merits.

That means the odds are that IM2 was a beneficiary of racist, pro-black admissions policies and went to a college to which he would have been rejected if he were white.

Odds are also that a better-qualifying white, Asian, or Jewish student was rejected to make room for him. He should be appreciative of the opportunities afforded him by having been born in this country.
 
Good work.

I guess the question is, what is the value of learning, citing, and highlighting this historical information?

One reaction might be to celebrate the fact that today's Black Americans can...
  • vote in any election, provided they have the ability to get a free government ID card, and show up,
  • run for any office in the Land,
  • get as much education as their talents and ambition can bring, with no obstacles whatsoever,
  • live in virtually any community where they might want, as long as they can afford it,
  • work for any employer in any job, provided they arguably have the resume to get it,
  • eat, drink, and recreate in any public facility in the Land, with only a few meaningless exceptions,
  • inherit and leave to their heirs as much as they can, with no impediments,
  • avail themselves of any government program in existence, and many such programs that are closed to "white" people,
  • benefit from a cornucopia of "affirmative action" programs in government, private industry, non-profits, social organizations, and other institutions.
There are some damages that essentially cannot be recovered, for example, the "leg up" that having middle-class or upper-class parents can provide, but one could argue that most "white" people pretty much start with nothing anyway; "we" are not all privileged.

So do you whine about what happened essentially before you were born or celebrate how far your "race" has come?
Give us some examples of Gov't programs that black folks have access to that whites do not.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
You blacks have been given free education, jobs, housing, food, energy & everything else since 1964 yet you continue to lie, steal, cheat, murder & cant do math. 1964 - 1618 = 346 years, not 404.

Mound Bayou, Mississippi was founded as free 100% black town in 1887. Today it's population is still 99.7% black & has a 46% poverty rate.

The USA working age population never experienced any negative black discrimination in their entire lifetime. Blacks have been carried on the backs of all US white slaves forced to support them.
Whites have been given free stuff since this was a colony. I'm black and I paid for my house, fodd, energy, edufation and everything you claim was given to us for free. The poorest county in America is 99 percent white. And blacks still face discrimination now. We have supported whites not the other way around.
 
Congrats, IM, your favorite word is WHITE. You use it more than 'the', 'and,' or 'or.' You must have white on the brain.
The favorite thing for whites like you here to do is make thread after thread dissing blacks. So deal with it.
 
The favorite thing for whites like you here to do is make thread after thread dissing blacks. So deal with it.

A). What makes you think I'm white? Did I ever SAY I was white, fool?

B). Show me one post where I ever dissed black people. There are known black people here who agree with every word I say because all I'm doing is telling you the honest TRUTH. Sorry if the truth hurts sometimes.

So deal with it.
 
A). What makes you think I'm white? Did I ever SAY I was white, fool?

B). Show me one post where I ever dissed black people. There are known black people here who agree with every word I say because all I'm doing is telling you the honest TRUTH. Sorry if the truth hurts sometimes.

So deal with it.
Lol! You're joking right?

There is nobody black here that I know who agrees with your racist drivel. There is nothing true about it white........ I'm black, I don't need some white idiot to tell me the "truth."
 
Lol! You're joking right?
Expect you to back up a thing you say? Noted is your deflection from showing how you know my skin color much less producing anything racist I have ever said! That is STRIKE ONE against you again proving you a racist, lying, race-baiting bullshitter.

There is nobody black here that I know who agrees with your racist drivel.
There is nobody here who agrees with me whom you are willing to ACKNOWLEDGE is black. But then, most of us don't ever make a point of saying what our skin color is because we aren't all driven by racism like you are who make a point of saying: "LOOKEE ME! I'M BLACK!" And STILL, you can't produce anything to back up a single claim you ever make.

There is nothing true about it white........ I'm black, I don't need some white idiot to tell me the "truth."
The Racist speaks. 20 words and three of them are white, black and white again. Gee, I bet someone could have a complete conversation with you only using two words! You can't even go one sentence without bringing up race! And the grand finale? I'm an idiot BECAUSE I'm white. :auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top