Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?
This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.
Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?
This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.
Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.Democrats making a mountain out of a mole hill for the 10,000th time. Or in some cases, as in "Russian Collusion" just completely fabricate the mountain.
Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.
....and, the guy was a Russian Plant the whole time.
Again, you guys claimed this fellow was so credible, so sterling of a reputation, that we needed to immediately impeach Biden on his claim that Bursima bribed him.
....and, the guy was a Russian Plant the whole time.
Utter rubbish. How does a guy with no online presence peddle anything to impact anything?
This is just a rerun of the lies of 2016 in a new package for the gullible.
Gym Jordan finds out about it and continues being a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda.
Was this a serious question? The repub s case was built off this propaganda, they passed it down to your ilk, then you spread it.
They told Gym the info was unverified. Gym blabbed it anyway.Stop posting BS.
Smirnov was the FBI's guy since c.2010. They represented him as reliable to Congress. Though Congress never spoke with him, etc., as posted above.
Errr. It was the FBI who said Smirnov was credible, and had since c.2010 while paying the guy hundreds of thousands of dollars for his info.
We can clear this up for you.
1) We never knew the informant's name
2) We never talked to the informant
3) The FBI never gave us his name and redacted the FD-1023 because they said he was so important to an ongoing investigation
4) The FBI told the committee, including Democrats, the informant was highly credible
That sounds like some serious backpeddling. If you didn't know the guys names, never talked to him, and saw that most of the FD1023 was redacted, that should have been good enough reason not to go out on a limb.
Especially when the FBI said that they couldn't verify any of the Biden-related information. And especially knowing Russian disinformation campaigns are rampant.
FFS. You're spinning and no one is buying it. The FBI confirmed the guy was reliable and that is why they kept paying him quite handsomely.