Trump going off the rails right now outside courthouse.

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Who is "we?"

Now you can study pronouns. We understand you are still challenged by them.

 

[Meathead]

Now you can study pronouns. We understand you are still challenged by them.

To be fair, in your gay world everyone is.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

To be fair, in your gay world everyone is.

In your gay world, maybe. In our non-binary world, the people are fine.

 

[Meathead]

In your gay world, maybe. In our non-binary world, the people are fine.

So your pronoun is "we"? You get why it's confusing, right?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Says who?.... I've written checks to lawyers and listed them as a legal expense.... Its impossible to prove what you are saying...
You can't convict a man on what you think he may have done...
What kind of country do you want to live in?... people died for the justice in America we enjoy today and due to your hatred of one man you are willing to piss it all away....

Yes, prosecution has proven the case.

We live in a country of law, the which you, Donald, and I are subject to.

 

[Rambunctious]

Yes, prosecution has proven the case.

We live in a country of law, the which you, Donald, and I are subject to.

Finally..... then you can tell what what the crime is....

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

 

[playtime]

People are stupid Playtime is no exception.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Finally..... then you can tell what what the crime is....

You’ll have one more chance to get it when the jury instructions come out.
Pay attention this time.

 

[playtime]

Trump didn't falsify any records...

he sure knew about it ... & he authorized every step of that there falsifications. therefore he's part of the crime.

every Check paid to a lawyer is listed as a legal expense....

but but but - there is the formality & the legality of drawing up a contract ie ... a retainer agreement - so everything is on the up & up. that wasn't done ... because there was no retaining.

no crime in any of that...

when it was under fraudulent circumstances, you bet yer sweet bippy there was crimin' goin' on. you think the IRS will just accept 'legal expenses' as a valid reason on taxes to take a deduction?

over & over & over again? hence - a formal agreement would be needed.

you may think he was hiding something

i shirley do.

but you can't prove it or what he was trying to hide and from who or for what....

it's not up to me to decide ... but the jury that hears alllllll the evidence .... from 1st person witness' to a paper trail & lack of formal paper ... to audio.

 

[Meathead]

he sure knew about it ... & he authorized every step of that there falsifications. therefore he's part of the crime.




but but but - there is the formality & the legality of drawing up a contract ie ... a retainer agreement - so everything is on the up & up. that wasn't done ... because there was no retaining.



when it was under fraudulent circumstances, you bet yer sweet bippy there was crimin' goin' on. you think the IRS will just accept 'legal expenses' as a valid reason on taxes to take a deduction?

over & over & over again? hence - a formal agreement would be needed.




i shirley do.





it's not up to me to decide ... but the jury that hears alllllll the evidence .... from 1st person witness' to a paper trail & lack of formal paper ... to audio.

View attachment 950021

Get over it. They cannot convict. They've just paved the way for a Trump second term.

 

[playtime]

Get over it. They cannot convict. They've just paved the way for a Trump second term.

 

[Meathead]

View attachment 950028

Why do you guys keep doing this to yourselves? You wet your panties wet and then invariably get them bunched up over and over again.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

 

[Lastamender]

That does not mean you are not a dumbass, but nice try.

 

[Rambunctious]

he sure knew about it ... & he authorized every step of that there falsifications. therefore he's part of the crime.

Knew about what?... a check to a lawyer being listed as a legal expense?... what's he going to list it as Stormy pay off?... it still wouldn't be illegal....

 

[Rambunctious]

he sure knew about it ... & he authorized every step of that there falsifications. therefore he's part of the crime.




but but but - there is the formality & the legality of drawing up a contract ie ... a retainer agreement - so everything is on the up & up. that wasn't done ... because there was no retaining.



when it was under fraudulent circumstances, you bet yer sweet bippy there was crimin' goin' on. you think the IRS will just accept 'legal expenses' as a valid reason on taxes to take a deduction?

over & over & over again? hence - a formal agreement would be needed.




i shirley do.





it's not up to me to decide ... but the jury that hears alllllll the evidence .... from 1st person witness' to a paper trail & lack of formal paper ... to audio.

View attachment 950021

Oh oh your TDS is acting up again....

 

[forkintheroad7]

Even if by some chance the jury rules against Trump, and knowing human nature that can happen

in NYC

There are reversible errors galore

 

[john doe 101]

You tell me. He trolls the shit out of you.

Lol that you think that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Knew about what?... a check to a lawyer being listed as a legal expense?... what's he going to list it as Stormy pay off?... it still wouldn't be illegal....

No, not just once more. The gangster's fate is in the hands of a jury of his peers.