ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

[Luddly Neddite]

ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.

You better lock up your bibles too.


Yes, that's a real headline but before the nutters go all to pieces, read the article.

 

[JGalt]

Guns. Like to see him try. Guns.

 

[Obiwan]

It's a crock of shit if he does that. People are entitled to technical info on their guns just like they're entitled to have a technical manual on their cars or other items.

 

[HenryBHough]

It becomes crystal clear that starting troll threads pays better than just trolling existing ones.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.

You better lock up your bibles too.


Yes, that's a real headline but before the nutters go all to pieces, read the article.

Thought inciting a riot was illegal?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

It becomes crystal clear that starting troll threads pays better than just trolling existing ones.

So now posting actual articles is considered to be trolling?

I did say you should look at the link BEFORE going all to pieces, didn't I?

But I see that posts 2 and 3 didn't bother.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Much as I find prison/con or whatever's gun threads annoying, didn't think the President would get involved.

 

[HenryBHough]

I do hope they send you the 1099, Luddie old girl!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.

You better lock up your bibles too.


Yes, that's a real headline but before the nutters go all to pieces, read the article.

Your avatar suits you perfectly

 

[deltex1]

ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.

You better lock up your bibles too.


Yes, that's a real headline but before the nutters go all to pieces, read the article.

I hear he gags a lot when Reggie be in town, yo...

 

[Obiwan]

It becomes crystal clear that starting troll threads pays better than just trolling existing ones.

So now posting actual articles is considered to be trolling?

I did say you should look at the link BEFORE going all to pieces, didn't I?

Much as I find prison/con or whatever's gun threads annoying, didn't think the President would get involved.

But I see that posts 2 and 3 didn't bother.

I did look at it... and the information should be available to gun owners.

 

[HenryBHough]

[
I hear he gags a lot when Reggie be in town, yo...

Gotta break somebody's heart......

Reginald Jackson Obituary - Fall River MA The Herald News

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

ALERT: Obama to Issue “Gag Order” on Guns

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.

You better lock up your bibles too.


Yes, that's a real headline but before the nutters go all to pieces, read the article.

here is a clip from the article - as for locking up our Bibles? Many Christians have the Word of God memorized. Taking our Bibles will not change the fact that the Word of God is in us!

it reads:

In an unprecedented move against the First and Second Amendments, President Barack Obama will effectively issue a “gag order” on information available on the internet regarding firearms.


He plans to carry this out through the retooling of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which regulates technical data on ammo and firearms, such as design, development and production information. While ITAR hasn’t been much cause for concern in the past, Obama has become infamous for utilizing existing regulatory bodies to overstep his bounds, and that of Congress, in his bid to crush our Constitutional rights.

In their current form, the ITAR do not (as a rule) regulate technical data that are in what the regulations call the “public domain.” Essentially, this means data “which is published and which is generally accessible or available to the public” through a variety of specified means. These include “at libraries open to the public or from which the public can obtain documents.” Many have read this provision to include material that is posted on publicly available websites, since most public libraries these days make Internet access available to their patrons. The ITAR, however, were originally promulgated in the days before the Internet. Some State Department officials now insist that anything published online in a generally-accessible location has essentially been “exported,” as it would be accessible to foreign nationals both in the U.S. and overseas.

With the new proposal published on June 3, the State Department claims to be “clarifying” the rules concerning “technical data” posted online or otherwise “released” into the “public domain.” To the contrary, however, the proposal would institute a massive new prior restraint on free speech. This is because all such releases would require the “authorization” of the government before they occurred. The cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining such authorizations, moreover, would make online communication about certain technical aspects of firearms and ammunition essentially impossible.

Penalties for violations are severe and for each violation could include up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. Civil penalties can also be assessed. Each unauthorized “export,” including to subsequent countries or foreign nationals, is also treated as a separate violation.

How does this translate into real life? Gunsmiths, manufacturers, and do-it-yourselfers could all find themselves muzzled under the rule and unable to distribute or obtain the information they rely on to conduct their business via constraints on the internet.

If this sound like government control of Free Speech, that’s because that is exactly to what it amounts. Stalin and Lenin would be so proud of our Comrade-in-Chief. Sign the Tea Party petition HERE to demand that our Congressional leaders stand up to this blatant disregard for our Constitutional rights.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

It also said he is going to issue a gag order - not that he had done it. We'll see.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Notice the author makes disparaging remarks about the President being a 'comrade-in-chief' and Stalin and Lenin would be proud.

Denouncing political opposition as communists is an old tactic. I'm surprised it's still a thing. Makes the ones doing sounds like fucking idiots.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Well, if he followed through on such a gag order - people would be justified in accusing him of a communist tactic. It is what a communist would do - after all.

 

[JGalt]

Well, if he followed through on such a gag order - people would be justified in accusing him of a communist tactic. It is what a communist would do - after all.

What has he done so far that's led anyone to believe he's not a Communist?

 

[cnm]

They're still terrorised by the dust bunnies under their beds.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Notice that the OP/ED is nothing but fear mongering.

Not a fact in sight.

 

[Socialist]

Well, if he followed through on such a gag order - people would be justified in accusing him of a communist tactic. It is what a communist would do - after all.

What has he done so far that's led anyone to believe he's not a Communist?

Encouraged the private sector? Never ONCE discussed seizing the means of production and giving it to the working class? A supporter of capitalists? He's religious? (Most communists are materialists, as am I, very few communists are religious.) You can't honestly believe Obama is a communist, a "communist" can subscribe to a large number of tendencies, whether it be marxism-leninism, maoism, trotskyism, orthodox leninism, titoism.. However, all communists are marxists, marxism is a worldview based in dialectical materialism, a way to examine the way society changes and a method of looking at history, I have never seen Obama done anything even remotely close to this, of course, 99% of americans have no basic idea of what socialism/communism is anyway, much like yourself, which is pathetic.