Dale Smith
Platinum Member
You are being very disingenous concerning what you believe to be hacking attempts and Russia isn't the suspect. The "silver-phising was traced back to a city on the west coast and one on the East coast. This spamming attempt was to get the victim to " verify" their password. You are either totally ignorant or you are lying and attempting to deceive.The Mueller explains what they looked at. The malware was taken off the servers. They had logs from ISPs to show the data traffic.The actual evidence the FBI looked at to make its claims. Of course, we both know there is no such evidence. Mueller pulled a fast one. He plain out lied.What were you looking for exactly?Nope. Mueller's unsupported claims (his report) are proof of nothing. And that's all an indictment is: proof of nothing. That's why we have trials.Show us the proof they did what you claim.You don’t know what you’re talking about and Bill Binney didn’t lay it all out. He breaks codes but he doesn’t know much about cyber security.You want to go? Because there’s not a doubt in my mind I know more about this than you.I love bitch slapping you you uneducated sheep. You download an email, theres a marker stating so. Those marks weren’t there. Amount of data and the timeframe given proved it was not possible for an outside source to do this. Period. Proven. Undeniable no matter how much you cry. USB? That would be an inside job you moron. Like a thumb drive. You truly are a grade 1 fool.
The transfer speeds you’re referring to were derived from metadata. There is no evidence to support a conclusion that the file transfer referenced in that metadata was the transfer from the DNC server to storage media. In fact, there’s evidence to the contrary.
That transfer occurred on July 5th. The last DNC email was from late May. In reality, the data transfer you’re referencing occurred well after the server was hacked.
It wasn't hacked at all. William Binney laid it out perfectly and the man has broken more code than just about any one else alive. When the owner of Crowdstrike was put under oath, he could not say with any certainty that the server was hacked, much less "pinpoint" who may have done it. They were given a limited amount of data that would not have stood up to scrutiny in a court of law. What you also lack the understanding of is that security breaches will be detected by even mediocre firewall software and the I.T guys will be alerted to shut down the server. Downloading e-mails on the other side of a firewall in mere minutes to a device.....like a thumb-drive?
The FBI forensics analyzed the malware. They checked data logs. They traced the data moving off the servers to another site. The myth of the thumb drive is no different than your myth that the FBI had Rich’s laptop. Baseless