Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Those agencies looked the other way. This should be compared to government data of those same dates and times. They have the same information, I bet. If the Supreme Court does not hear this it confirms that our own government is the enemy of the people. And that China owns us.Okay, I have now watched the video. If the stuff presented in the video is true, shouldn't the alphabet agencies be on top of this? Maybe they all are in the back pocket of the democrats, IDK? I personally don't see this going anywhere, and I am holding on for the ride Biden and Hair-Ass are going to take us on for 4 years.I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
It is fact. The data does not lie. You do.You're quite amusing.I see Canycorn is amused. Maybe he/she could impart some knowledge of computers and why this is not evidence?
Just let us know when the arrests start taking place...
You will do that right?
Does Mike Lindell have standing to present it to an appropriate court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
The FBI will not back it. They should. A lot of people are going to see this or hear about it. Let's hope that keeps it alive. It is actual proof. I have yet to see any rebuttal about PCAPS.Does Mike Lindell have standing to present it to an appropriate court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
Yes, if true, it needs to be presented in court.....backed by the FBI, not Mike Lindell and his anonymous expert.
Time to sign up for a Mandarin class.Those agencies looked the other way. This should be compared to government data of those same dates and times. They have the same information, I bet. If the Supreme Court does not hear this it confirms that our own government is the enemy of the people. And that China owns us.Okay, I have now watched the video. If the stuff presented in the video is true, shouldn't the alphabet agencies be on top of this? Maybe they all are in the back pocket of the democrats, IDK? I personally don't see this going anywhere, and I am holding on for the ride Biden and Hair-Ass are going to take us on for 4 years.I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
Fact...zero arrests for widespread voter fraud.It is fact. The data does not lie. You do.You're quite amusing.I see Canycorn is amused. Maybe he/she could impart some knowledge of computers and why this is not evidence?
Just let us know when the arrests start taking place...
You will do that right?
You need to ask the courts they make the decisions on what is heard. Our courts are corrupt and if they can keep this out of court, they will. The fact remains what happened in real time was captured and cannot be changed.By all means....Why isn't it being presented in a court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
fact...totally corrupt law enforcement agencies.Fact...zero arrests for widespread voter fraud.It is fact. The data does not lie. You do.You're quite amusing.I see Canycorn is amused. Maybe he/she could impart some knowledge of computers and why this is not evidence?
Just let us know when the arrests start taking place...
You will do that right?
Your move.
That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
I think your tinfoil hat may be on too tight.That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
It proves fraud. If a court hears it, it is game over.I think your tinfoil hat may be on too tight.That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
No it doesn’t. You’re just a conspiracy theory nut.It proves fraud. If a court hears it, it is game over.I think your tinfoil hat may be on too tight.That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
Yes it does.No it doesn’t. You’re just a conspiracy theory nut.It proves fraud. If a court hears it, it is game over.I think your tinfoil hat may be on too tight.That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
And yet here you are. In the conspiracy theory forum. Again.Yes it does.No it doesn’t. You’re just a conspiracy theory nut.It proves fraud. If a court hears it, it is game over.I think your tinfoil hat may be on too tight.That is hard evidence and you know it. Where are the cyber experts disputing what was said? The networks won't touch this. They will use the "it's Lindell" excuse. They will never explain what was found only talk about who found it. This could be the straw, you mentioned, that breaks the camels back.Maybe you should just stay in the conspiracy theory section.
You need to ask the courts they make the decisions on what is heard. Our courts are corrupt and if they can keep this out of court, they will. The fact remains what happened in real time was captured and cannot be changed.By all means....Why isn't it being presented in a court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
You can't even troll. Next.You need to ask the courts they make the decisions on what is heard. Our courts are corrupt and if they can keep this out of court, they will. The fact remains what happened in real time was captured and cannot be changed.By all means....Why isn't it being presented in a court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
Every court is corrupt? Really?
Well...if this guy files suit and presents it to a court....tell us why the court would throw it out unless there is some actual facts presented.You can't even troll. Next.You need to ask the courts they make the decisions on what is heard. Our courts are corrupt and if they can keep this out of court, they will. The fact remains what happened in real time was captured and cannot be changed.By all means....Why isn't it being presented in a court?Shouldn't this be presented to a court?I know that attacking the source is a logical fallacy; however, Mike Lindell should not be the face of this if it is to be taken seriously.
No, I did not take time to watch the video.
I agree. Nothing against Mike Lindell, but why does this country have no one better than a pillow maker to expose flaws in our elections? Don't we pay people to look into this stuff?
Why does the GOP only get a tongue-tied pillow seller to expose top criminal matters for the government while the DNC gets a three year 45 million dollar investigation over a few Facebook ads telling the truth about Hillary just because they were paid for by a few Russians? AFTER we find out it was a set up using lies to the FISA court in the first place?
Why do we need to rely on Russia in the first place just to hear some truth about Hillary?
Every court is corrupt? Really?
