Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What happened yesterday was extreme weather.
To the contrary, what happened yesterday was typical weather for OK. Tornadoes happen all the time in tornado alley.
Ergo the name "Tornado Alley". Warmers just don't think. They feel, they fear, they often decend into hysterics but rarely, if ever do they think.
So what if the NASA are based on their earlier models, how does that address my statement?Well for one thing it renders false your claim that all the GCM's don't included a spherical rotating Earth.
LOL, How? Because you say so? ROFL, your rambling nonsense again poopie pants. Explained all of that already numerous times and your continued pretense is amusing as well as pathetic.
What happens to climate models that do not show they are within the accepted energy budget of the planet??
Accepted how?
ROFL, you are now going to try and claim that trenberth isn't the most widely used and accepted energy budget??? Really????
Okay poopie, keep on dancing..
Translation, don't pick on my friend!
Well for one thing it renders false your claim that all the GCM's don't included a spherical rotating Earth.
So what if the NASA are based on their earlier models, how does that address my statement?
LOL, How? Because you say so?
Used for what?ROFL, you are now going to try and claim that trenberth isn't the most widely used and accepted energy budget??? Really????
LOL, How? Because you say so?
No. Because the computer code itself clearly has spherical geometry terms and Coriolis terms. I posted the actual literal code and the source from which it came, would you like me to re-post it?
Used for what?ROFL, you are now going to try and claim that trenberth isn't the most widely used and accepted energy budget??? Really????
The Sun provides heat to our planet. However, only about half of the sunlight heats the surface of the Earth. A third of the sunlight is reflected back into space by the surface and atmosphere, while one sixth is absorbed in the atmosphere and then re-emitted. This energy budget of "heat in" versus "heat out" directly influences the Earth's short-term and long-term climate trends.
An accurate description of Earth's energy budget is important for scientists in order to anticipate future changes to our climate. Shifts in the global climate and the associated weather patterns impact human life by altering landscapes and changing the availability of natural resources. Scientists are actively working to better understand exactly how and why this energy budget changes. The NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Glory mission will provide significant contributions toward this critical endeavor.
I got it from right here:
No. Because the computer code itself clearly has spherical geometry terms and Coriolis terms. I posted the actual literal code and the source from which it came, would you like me to re-post it?
Used for what?
Poopie pants, you posted a googled bit of code you got from I don't know where.
I got it from right here:No. Because the computer code itself clearly has spherical geometry terms and Coriolis terms. I posted the actual literal code and the source from which it came, would you like me to re-post it?
Used for what?
Poopie pants, you posted a googled bit of code you got from I don't know where.
EdGCM - Model II
Do you need me to repost the part where the Coriolis and spherical geometry terms are computed?
I got it from right here:Poopie pants, you posted a googled bit of code you got from I don't know where.
EdGCM - Model II
Do you need me to repost the part where the Coriolis and spherical geometry terms are computed?
And it matters how?
I got it from right here:
EdGCM - Model II
Do you need me to repost the part where the Coriolis and spherical geometry terms are computed?
And it matters how?
You said GCM's don't have rotation and a spherical Earth. The code I presented clearly has those terms. You were wrong.
And it matters how?
You said GCM's don't have rotation and a spherical Earth. The code I presented clearly has those terms. You were wrong.
That's what you keep claiming isn't it. Even though I explained it several times and in two threads now.. That's right, keep repeating the same BS and people will believe it.. LOL No socko, you were wrong. Wrong about your claim, wrong about your attack, wrong about your equation, wrong about trenberth, wrong about just about everything on this so far.
Nice work Astroturf technician.. ROFL..
I didn't make a claim. You did. You claimed no GCM's include spherical earth with rotation, did you not? Did I not prove this claim false by showing that at least one GCM does?
I didn't make a claim. You did. You claimed no GCM's include spherical earth with rotation, did you not? Did I not prove this claim false by showing that at least one GCM does?
I made the claim. And I ask again, what is the point in modeling a spinning sphere if it is still going to be receiving weak twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day with no day/night separation?
We modify the solar radiation treatment of Lacis and Hansen (1974) to obtain accurate results at all zenith angles and all layer optical thicknesses.
I didn't make a claim. You did. You claimed no GCM's include spherical earth with rotation, did you not? Did I not prove this claim false by showing that at least one GCM does?
I made the claim. And I ask again, what is the point in modeling a spinning sphere if it is still going to be receiving weak twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day with no day/night separation?
I didn't make a claim. You did. You claimed no GCM's include spherical earth with rotation, did you not? Did I not prove this claim false by showing that at least one GCM does?
I made the claim. And I ask again, what is the point in modeling a spinning sphere if it is still going to be receiving weak twilight across its entire surface 24 hours a day with no day/night separation?
How many of articles of skeptics were accepted for review?
