91 Percent Drop in Muslim Refugees under Trump

If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
Trump took an oath to defend America. These Constitution applies to Americans and those that are in the country. We are not compelled by it to accept the scum of the earth.

just partisan bigots like you huh ..
Sorry boy, I was born in America of an American father, a USN Navy Captain, not some wetback. No terrorist or moochers here I'm afraid. Again, sorry.

Really --- your father gave birth huh? What a planet. Or maybe you're a seahorse.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
It's less about the religion and more about their ignorance, violence and generally poor hygiene. Stinky beheader's don't make good neighbors.

The OP named a religion though.

So did Rump.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
Trump took an oath to defend America. These Constitution applies to Americans and those that are in the country. We are not compelled by it to accept the scum of the earth.

just partisan bigots like you huh ..
Sorry boy, I was born in America of an American father, a USN Navy Captain, not some wetback. No terrorist or moochers here I'm afraid. Again, sorry.

Really --- your father gave birth huh? What a planet. Or maybe you're a seahorse.
I get that you're an airhead Pogo, but really?
 
How interesting. Perhaps you should start a thread about Obama. Opps! Forgot. Any criticism of Trump requires a criticism of Obama or Hillary as a reply.
Of course it does. Why do you think Trump is president?

I've got two laws of nature that explain that:

1- "You don't sell products, benefits or solutions --- you sell feelings"

2 - "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public"​

Add those up, there's your answer and Bob's your uncle. Or perhaps your pregnant father.
 
How interesting. Perhaps you should start a thread about Obama. Opps! Forgot. Any criticism of Trump requires a criticism of Obama or Hillary as a reply.
Of course it does. Why do you think Trump is president?

I've got two laws of nature that explain that:

1- "You don't sell products, benefits or solutions --- you sell feelings"

2 - "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public"​

Add those up, there's your answer and Bob's your uncle. Or perhaps your pregnant father.
You do get that there's a difference between being an airhead and an asshole, right? There should be a difference of being a left wing hack and an asshole too, but alas, that is not always the case. Clearly.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
..real smart there MR Smart guy--let muslim terrorists over to the US to MURDER Americans because of your interpretation
..where in there does it say the POTUS cannot defend America?
..how in the world do you come up with religious discrimination'' and banning refugees??
..they can practice ALL the religion they want !!!!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I said nothing about "letting "muslim [sic]" terrorists in. The OP didn't either. He said "Muslim refugees".

If some set of people were 'terrorists' --- then they wouldn't be 'refugees' now would they.

DUH.

Goalpost move fails.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
Prove people are being rejected for religion.
I said the same thing to righties a couple years ago when christians were getting overlooked under obama.


Muslims are assholes. They are being kept out because they are assholes. That is a good thing. the last thing we need in this country is to be importing assholes, isn't it?
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
/——/ The Constitution applies to American citizens not to refugeees in another country you idiot.

Wrong. The Constitution applies to the government.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
Prove people are being rejected for religion.
I said the same thing to righties a couple years ago when christians were getting overlooked under obama.


Muslims are assholes. They are being kept out because they are assholes. That is a good thing. the last thing we need in this country is to be importing assholes, isn't it?

How'd you get in here then?
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
/——/ The Constitution applies to American citizens not to refugeees in another country you idiot.

Wrong. The Constitution applies to the government.
/---/ Correct. I should have said the Constitution protects American citizens not foreign nationals outside the border.
 
Then why do some states NEED immigrants to fill jobs?
And why did Paul Ryan tell Americans to get out there and multiply--America needs workers?
 

MORE deflection detected.

The OP claims, "91 Percent Drop in Muslim Refugees"

Your reply: "Let's keep shooting for 100%"

Therefore the qualifier is included. Dance away from it all you like but it's following you like a puppy,

Feed it.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand crickets. Who saw that coming besides everybody.

OP has abandoned thread as well. Understandably.
 
Then why do some states NEED immigrants to fill jobs?
And why did Paul Ryan tell Americans to get out there and multiply--America needs workers?

Really? Pale Ryan, Sex Machine?

I'm having a challenging time picturing that.
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
..real smart there MR Smart guy--let muslim terrorists over to the US to MURDER Americans because of your interpretation
..where in there does it say the POTUS cannot defend America?
..how in the world do you come up with religious discrimination'' and banning refugees??
..they can practice ALL the religion they want !!!!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I said nothing about "letting "muslim [sic]" terrorists in. The OP didn't either. He said "Muslim refugees".

If some set of people were 'terrorists' --- then they wouldn't be 'refugees' now would they.

DUH.

Goalpost move fails.
the muslims/islamics/Middle Easters/ want to murder as many Americans as they can:
San Bernadino terrorists
Boston Bombers
9-11
Ft Hood
Shoe Bomber
1993 Twin Towers terrorists :
The attack was planned by a group of terrorists including Ramzi Yousef, Mahmud Abouhalima, Mohammad Salameh, Nidal A. Ayyad, Abdul Rahman Yasin, and Ahmed Ajaj. They received financing from Khaled Sheikh Mohammed,
etc etc
Boston population about 600,000 only one% is islamic--but it was islamics that were the terrorist bombers!

you do agree we want to cut down the chances of terrorists attacks--yes??
...it is STUPID to just let them---islamics/muslims/Middle Easters ---to just come on over whenever they want
STUPID---there are many of them that want to MURDER Americans!!!
 
If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
Prove people are being rejected for religion.
I said the same thing to righties a couple years ago when christians were getting overlooked under obama.


Muslims are assholes. They are being kept out because they are assholes. That is a good thing. the last thing we need in this country is to be importing assholes, isn't it?

How'd you get in here then?


Here is an example of Muslim refugees being assholes

Also an example of the stupidity of the Moon Bats that don't think they are assholes, like you.




Swedish woman who accompanied two Afghans to prove that xenophobes are wrong, is raped and abused

Northern Europe
Swedish woman who accompanied two Afghans to prove that xenophobes are wrong, is raped and abused

A middle-aged Swedish woman was raped and abused by two Afghan asylum seekers in their asylum accommodation, Fria Tider reports. The woman, who was a member of a Facebook group against migrant deportations, tried to prove that xenophobes are wrong about the fact that Afghans are dangerous.


The woman was raped and harassed on 26 December last year. She wanted to meet someone during a night out and when she was unsuccessful, decided to go with the two Afghan men, she told the police.


She met the two unaccompanied refugees from Afghanistan outside a pub and decided to accompany them to their asylum centre in Ljungby.


The woman, a member of an anti-deportation group, told police: “I have never been afraid or worried about people from other countries” and “I thought it was quite interesting to talk with them”.


When they arrived at the men’s room in the asylum accommodation, things changed rapidly. They drank alcohol and one of the men started touching her, even though she told him she didn’t want him to and against her repeated protests.


Later, one of the men, called Anwar, raped her vaginally and anally, while the other masturbated next to her. It was a very painful experience she said.


After getting away the woman called the police. The two Afghans were arrested and were convicted last week by the Växjö District Court.


Anwar is convicted of rape. His sentence was one year and three months in prison. He will also pay 134,990 SEK (13,000 euros) in damages to the woman. Fardin is sentenced for sexual abuse and he will pay 23,990 SEK (2,300 euros) in damages to the victim. The prosecutor never asked for Fardin to be expelled.


The woman was traumatised by the horrible experience and now has sleep problems.
 
The constitution applies to those who are in the United States under the jurisdiction of the United States. It does not apply to those not under the jurisdiction of the United States that in in other countries (or at least it should not).

If you're suggesting a causal link, then you're also suggesting Rump was bullshitting when he took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution, the First Amendment of which bars religious discrimination.

Not that that should be news to anybody.
/——/ The Constitution applies to American citizens not to refugeees in another country you idiot.

Wrong. The Constitution applies to the government.
/---/ Correct. I should have said the Constitution protects American citizens not foreign nationals outside the border.

It doesn't directly "protect" anybody except by restricting what the government can do. And one of those restrictions is religious discrimination.

Suppose some wackball painted himself orange and called for "the complete and total shutdown of Jews entering the United States" Or "the complete and total shutdown of Lutherans entering the United States" Take that thought wherever it goes and we'll see you on the other side.
 
Unless we have a shortage of Syrians. If we do maybe I’ll listen to an argument on letting more in.

Here in conservative Idaho but reasonably progressive Boise - We have welcomed them.

Over a thousand now and nary a problem in the past 4 years.

This U.S. city has more Syrian refugees than New York and LA combined

Your Orange God is making Syria as well as hatred of the US a more dangerous situation - Tell him to cut it the hell out.

Sure for you treasonous bastards no problem...and a very clear reason for sending them to the Midwest.

Nebraska Dems criticized by far-right outlets for giving voter-registration forms to refugees

“Nebraska, like the vast majority of states, does not require verification of citizenship during voter registration. ”

Non citizens are not allowed to vote in federal elections - And they know better than to risk fines, imprisonment and possible deportation

The right of foreigners to vote in the United States[1][2] has historically been a contentious issue. A foreigner, in this context, is an alien or a person who is not a citizen of the United States.

Since 1996, a federal law has prohibited non-citizens from voting in federal elections, punishing them by fines, imprisonment, inadmissibility, and deportation.[3][4][5] Exempt from punishment is any non-citizen who "reasonably believed at the time of voting (...) that he or she was a citizen of the United States," had a parent who is or was a citizen, and began permanently living in the United States before turning 16 years old.[3] The federal law does not prohibit non-citizens from voting in state or local elections, but no state has allowed non-citizens to vote in state elections since Arkansas became the last state to outlaw non-citizen voting in 1926.[6] 11 local governments, 10 of them in Maryland, allow non-citizens to vote in their local elections (Takoma Park, Barnesville, Martin's Additions, Somerset, Chevy Chase Sections 3 and 5, Glen Echo, Garrett Park, Hyattsville, and Mount Rainer). San Francisco allows noncitizens parents to vote in School Board elections (beginning in 2018).[7]
 
Then why do some states NEED immigrants to fill jobs?
And why did Paul Ryan tell Americans to get out there and multiply--America needs workers?
for low paying jobs--and so they can lower wages--more workers = low wages higher prices
to keep low paying jobs at low wages
 

Forum List

Back
Top