Asclepias
Diamond Member
There is no assumption monkey. Tank long proved his racism before you even signed up for the site. You and he are from the same monkey tribe. Practically everyone knows this.White boys need to focus on Blacks even as their culture crumbles before their eyes yet once again.
Moronic racist nonsense.
Tank insulted the murderer, and you two rushed forward to defend him.
You morons wonder why people identify black criminals with the black community.
Here is your answer. Because the black community identifies with black criminals.
As you are doing right now.
You qre playing srmantics. And doing a piss poor job at it. If Tank was "insulting the killer" as you insist, WHY would he call him a "typical ni@@er"....in case you don't realize it, that statement invalidates any logic claiming that he was "just insulting the killer"
Suppose it was a white child that was killed and a black poster identified the killer as a "TYPICAL cracker", "peckerwood".....or even a "cave monkey"? Suppose it was an Asian killer and he was referred to as TYPICAL "Gook" or if it was a Jewish killer and he was labeled a TYPICAL "KiK@"?
Would that be considered offensive to you or your buddy Tank?
No one is defending the killer here, but by the same token it is easy to see your agenda if "your kind" which is to use the tragic death of this child to criminalize and insult an entire race of people.
Why is it necessary to use a thinly veiled racial slur that is an insult to the dead child, the dead childs parents, and the black population in general?
Why not call him a murderous, criminal who deserves to be convicted for the crime?
"People" like you and Tank gleefully look for ways even in the face of an utter tragedy to justify your racial slurs and will use the most horrendous crime to defend your thinly veiled racist actions. You NOR "Tank" have a shred of compassion for that dead child. In fact, knowing the mindset of some of you here, you are probably rejoicing quietly.
You're both disgusting.
To the extent that the word "typical" implied that ALL, or MOST blacks were like the shooter, then yes, that was inappropriate.
But anger often leads to inappropriate words or actions, and Tank was obviously angry.
Al and Caption were not. They were more upset with Tank's harsh language than the death of a black child.
They did defend the shooter in a number of ways, attacking the one insulting the shooter, and defecting to other issues, and in Al's case pretending that the shooter was someone else, ie a "white Oathkeeper".
You can deflect and try to justify Tanks statement however you wish. For one who is so "outraged" by the killer, he missed the opportunity to be critical of him soley, instead referring to him as "typical".
Him labeling the thug as a "typical ni@@er, speaks volumes.
And your insistence in defending him does as well.
He nor you care about the dead child. Your thinly veiled agendas are obvious.
This thread is nothing but a soapbox for racist dreck to use a dead child as racial "bait".
SMGDH
It only "speak volumes" if you want it to and you assume the worst of your fellow man.
This assumption of your allows you to smear your ideological opponents and to dismiss points of view and arguments that you do not want to address or even acknowledge.