- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,681
- 68,525
- 2,635
Which leads us to the reason they're euphemistically referred to as Twoofers....As the years have gone by, I've come to lower my expectations of getting those who strongly disagree with my views to come around to my side, and have settled for coming to agreements on smaller issues and perhaps getting them to doubt some of the beliefs they have, if only a little. I suggest you do the same, it may save you a lot of aggravation in the long run.Of course I want you to prove your case to [me]. That's the purpose of this exchange -- to determine the truth.
Faun doesn't seem to believe that just creating some doubt is either productive or intellectually honest.
Evidently you do.
There are dozens of websites dedicated to "proving" the lunar landing was a fraud. Where's the honesty in that?
As repeatedly noted in this thread, it really isn't enough to impugn the work and reputation of the professionals who investigated 9/11 and reported their findings. In fact, given that you have already admitted you know little about them, it's downright cheapshot-ish.
I never said I had any.Great, nothing but more unprovable denials. This us going nowhere because you're not posting proof.I never said it was.Casting doubt on the known evidence is not proof.
Which brings us to the crux of the biscuit!
You have no proof of pretty much anything you believe but you are dead sure you believe it!
Wow ... just wow.