Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
An ar15 is just an sporting rifle..."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
In the red county’s an ar15 is just a sporting rifle...An ar15 is just an sporting rifle..."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
That's nice. Don't get caught with one in Maryland, or anyplace else that restricts them, and you won't end up in prison, and lose all of your rights.
And since the Supreme Court isn't hearing any further cases involving Marylands law, you will not have any option to appeal your conviction.
Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.oh my fucking god.Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?
I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.
finally a reason to keep to facebook.
Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.
No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.
Bull crap. You want the truth, then read this from academia. It gets to the heart of the matter in the later page 200’s. You can start there, for referenceYou are so wrong.Actually, if you really knew American history, you would know.
It has nothing to do with history and everything to do with fantasy.
Sure, dope. It's just like the revolution. The founders would all be up in arms over the tyranny of a decision that they empowered the judiciary to make in a system they designed.
It's fantasy.
How the British Gun Control Program Precipitated the American Revolution
I never disputed that, dope.
I'm disputing the idea that the OP's example is in any way a relevant analogy to the revolution.
actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
great. now show me a military that uses the AR15.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
great. now show me a military that uses the AR15.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
the problem is the left redefines words to fit the situation, not accepts the situation and figures out how to deal with what is.
Wow. Just fucking wow.Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.
You realize it is satire, right? It is a recounting of the American Revolution using modern language.
Wow. Just fucking wow.Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.
You realize it is satire, right? It is a recounting of the American Revolution using modern language.
You must be intelligent to understand satire....just sayin...
and that's just it. you can call almost any gun "military" if you choose. what the left chooses to do is simply keep calling it whatever they have to call it in order to ban it. if they spent 1/2 the time understanding it they could spend 100% less time trying to reword it to fit their incorrect views on the topic.great. now show me a military that uses the AR15.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
the problem is the left redefines words to fit the situation, not accepts the situation and figures out how to deal with what is.
By 'military weaponry', he obviously wants to pout restrictions on Berretta M-9, Colt revolvers, M-I Garands, bayonets, K-Bars among other weapons common in civilian use.
Finally, it is. Started in straight politics.
Yep. Must have beer on the mind.You mean John Adams.Samuel Adams defended the British troops in court that killed the settlers if I remember correctly.Francis Wright
March 1 at 3:12pm ·
BREAKING NEWS: Seventy-Two Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation In Maryland.
National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.
Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement.
Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.
The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons.
Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.
One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”
Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.
During a tense standoff in the Lexington town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.
Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange.
Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.
Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops.
Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as “ringleaders” of the extremist faction, remain at large.
And this fellow Americans, is how the American Revolution began, April 20, 1775.
History. Study it, or repeat it.
*****************************
I imagine that it wouldn't go this way today. America has lost most of its backbone in the past 250 years or so.
Regardless, it is a lesson for gun grabbers to take to heart. Regardless of your deciet, even if you manage to get control of government, you'll never get the guns.
Ever.
The dope is the one that refuses to recognize the past.Bull crap. You want the truth, then read this from academia. It gets to the heart of the matter in the later page 200’s. You can start there, for referenceYou are so wrong.It has nothing to do with history and everything to do with fantasy.
Sure, dope. It's just like the revolution. The founders would all be up in arms over the tyranny of a decision that they empowered the judiciary to make in a system they designed.
It's fantasy.
How the British Gun Control Program Precipitated the American Revolution
I never disputed that, dope.
I'm disputing the idea that the OP's example is in any way a relevant analogy to the revolution.
Actually, if you read my link, the founders words directly contradict your assertion. But, you must read all the passages, not just those you wish to spread without further context of others as well.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
great. now show me a military that uses the AR15.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
the problem is the left redefines words to fit the situation, not accepts the situation and figures out how to deal with what is.
By 'military weaponry', he obviously wants to put restrictions on Berretta M-9, Colt revolvers, M-I Garands, bayonets, K-Bars among other weapons common in civilian use.
great. now show me a military that uses the AR15.actually it's a german reference."Assault rifle" is a term from the second world war, although the Thompson of WWI probably was a first.
But, why get into actual definition of words; it never achieves anything on these threads.
we get into the definition of words because, "words matter". holding the sarcasm, they do. the AR 15 by original definition is NOT an assault rifle so the left changed the definition to fit their emotional need to call it one and ban it.
when you ask what about it makes it "assault" they can't list a single trait that other guns they didn't care about previously also share. this shows serious ignorance from the left on this topic and out of frustration to not be able to define their hate, they now hate it all and want semi automatic guns banned.
but they're not coming for our guns.
Instead of meaningless quibbling over specific nomenclature, take it to mean military weaponry.
the problem is the left redefines words to fit the situation, not accepts the situation and figures out how to deal with what is. i can't have a meaningful discussion with someone who's going to change words around vs. invest time into understanding what is.
won't
ever
happen
