50 potential jurors in Trump porn case already dismissed saying they COULD NOT be impartial

[Rambunctious]

Trump didn't attend the graduations of his other four kids

I would sure like to see you find the proof of that statement... because I've never heard that before... but it doesn't matter... he wants to see Barron graduate and the Judge would make a huge mistake if he locked Trump up for going....

 

[justoffal]

This trial will be a sham. Trump will not be treated fairly, nor will he be treated impartially.
They'll go through the motions, likely weeks will go by, but in the end the verdict will be guilty.

Possible questions for Jury Selection:

1.) Do you think Stormy Daniels breasts are real?
2.) How guilty is Donald Trump?
3.) Which Republican scum do you hate the most?
4.) Have you ever paid for sex?
5.) When Joe Biden is re-elected should he continue to prosecute Donald Trump?
6.) If you find Trump innocent would you be willing to stand trial for being a stealth juror?
......

 

[Rambunctious]

This board is getting weird and its getting weird fast....

 

[Concerned American]

I wish the judge had as much integrity as those potential jurors who
admitted they couldn't be fair or impartial.
Yup, a full blown sham in the making.

I haven't seen a teaspoon of integrity shown by the state in ANY of these legal proceedings re: Trump.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I would sure like to see you find the proof of that statement... because I've never heard that before... but it doesn't matter... he wants to see Barron graduate and the Judge would make a huge mistake if he locked Trump up for going....

.

As usual, the left would be hanging itself by the balls they only wish they had.

.

 

[justoffal]

I haven't seen a teaspoon of integrity shown by the state in ANY of these legal proceedings re: Trump.

Foul! I measured it and it's nearly a teaspoon!

 

[d0gbreath]

Getting out of jury duty, especially for a long trial, is a favorite American pastime. The questionnaire is making it real easy for them.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's all tiresome. Just tiresome.

Way too many real issues going on to be focused on some crap like this

 

[BackAgain]

This could take months to select a jury... guess Biden's henchmen didn't think that over....

Seriously? I’d say the longer a jury selection takes, the happier the Brandon henchthugs are. The goal is election interference. A prolonged trial is right up their alley.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

Is there anyone here who can honestly say that they would be impartial?

I can honestly say if I was part of this jury pool I would be doing everything possible to get kicked off. A long drawn out trial that is going to have national coverage and the know outright hatred the extremes on both sides have for each other makes sitting on this jury a nightmare. Anyone who is looking to be on the jury should raise a huge red flag.

 

[JoeB131]

Is there anyone here who can honestly say that they would be impartial?

I can honestly say if I was part of this jury pool I would be doing everything possible to get kicked off. A long drawn out trial that is going to have national coverage and the know outright hatred the extremes on both sides have for each other makes sitting on this jury a nightmare. Anyone who is looking to be on the jury should raise a huge red flag.

I guess. Not sure how else you can do it, though.

But given 85% of your jury pool voted against Trump, it doesn't bode well for him.

The real problem Trump has is that he totally did what he's accused of.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I guess. Not sure how else you can do it, though.

But given 85% of your jury pool voted against Trump, it doesn't bode well for him.

The real problem Trump has is that he totally did what he's accused of.

See? You'd never be seated on the jury

Nincompoop Joe wonders why

 

[BackAgain]

Is there anyone here who can honestly say that they would be impartial?

I can honestly say if I was part of this jury pool I would be doing everything possible to get kicked off. A long drawn out trial that is going to have national coverage and the know outright hatred the extremes on both sides have for each other makes sitting on this jury a nightmare. Anyone who is looking to be on the jury should raise a huge red flag.

If one happens to be truly objective about Trump, that fact alone is likely to get the persecution to kick you off.

If one hates Trump, two choices ensue:

(1) Admit the hate and get removed or (2) conceal the hate in the hope that you can be selected (so that you can convict him regardless of the lack of actual evidence and contrary to law).

 

[Lord-Humungus]

If one happens to be truly objective about Trump, that fact alone is likely to get the persecution to kick you off.

If one hates Trump, two choices ensue:

(1) Admit the hate and get removed or (2) conceal the hate in the hope that you can be selected (so that you can convict him regardless of the lack of actual evidence and contrary to law).

The same can be said for the defense. They don’t want to seat someone who is objective they are looking for someone who will not convict no matter what evidence is presented

 

[Rawley]

I think this is huge. Of course they can't find an impartial jury for Trump. People hate him. That's why these charges are all bullshit.

Over 50 potential jurors dismissed in Trump’s hush-money trial

Majority of those called admitted they could not be fair and impartial

www.telegraph.co.uk

And the other 46 are lying.

 

[Concerned American]

If one happens to be truly objective about Trump, that fact alone is likely to get the persecution to kick you off.

If one hates Trump, two choices ensue:

(1) Admit the hate and get removed or (2) conceal the hate in the hope that you can be selected (so that you can convict him regardless of the lack of actual evidence and contrary to law).

I read the questions to be asked of potential jurors and I never saw such a bunch of loaded questions. I doubt anyone will be selected. No one could be that answered honestly to all of those questions.

 

[Blaster]

I think this is huge. Of course they can't find an impartial jury for Trump. People hate him. That's why these charges are all bullshit.

Over 50 potential jurors dismissed in Trump’s hush-money trial

Majority of those called admitted they could not be fair and impartial

www.telegraph.co.uk

This case should be dropped.

 

[Rawley]

The real problem Trump has is that he totally did what he's accused of.

What business record did he falsify? What's the underlying crime?

 

[BackAgain]

The same can be said for the defense. They don’t want to seat someone who is objective they are looking for someone who will not convict no matter what evidence is presented

Obviously, if a properly zealous criminal defense attorney sees a sign that a prospective juror is all but certainly going to be a “not guilty” vote on the ultimate jury, it incumbent on that lawyer to seek to seat that prospective juror.

But that’s not the discussion.

The discussion is more about whether it is possible in a deep joke lib cesspool like Manhattan to filter a prospective jury panel properly and adequately to weed out the ones who would convict outbid hate rather than based on the law.

 

[struth]

Good luck with that. As you have decided he is not guilty, I have decided he probably is guilty, but neither of us on the jury or likely interacting with the jury, that is fine.

Well yeah....see that's the difference. I've decided he is not guilty until proven otherwise....you have already determined he's guilty before one witness was sworn in at trial.

That's why this is a kangaroo court, and a political hit job by demafascist